16
Comments (27)
sorted by:
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
-4
eyerighteye -4 points ago +2 / -6

Let's hope the other side never wins, they may well hold you to that same standard.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
-1
eyerighteye -1 points ago +1 / -2

Nice edits dip shit. Wait until I respond and then change your post? No class move.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
eyerighteye 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, those edits changed everything, and you know it. For now we are on the same side, let's play nice.

Trump wins it's a moot point anyway, and I don't see him loosing. Have a nice day.

-4
eyerighteye -4 points ago +1 / -5

Sure did.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
eyerighteye 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dude expanded his comments via an edit. I agree that now it isn't exactly hitting the right tone. I'm going to leave it though, as a example to others that people can and will edit things to make comments you make appear to support things you don't.

Rand is not supporting these terrorists and neither am I, in context of the original comment I was responding to, I stand by my statement. After the edit, I can see why folks would think my response stupid.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
eyerighteye 0 points ago +1 / -1

If I did, wouldn't I just delete?

0
eyerighteye 0 points ago +1 / -1

I am a big fan and supporter of Rand Paul. Don't much care what you think about it.

8
PewPew_ThaDuK 8 points ago +10 / -2

This is why he won't ever be president

6
Jabblemonkey1 6 points ago +7 / -1

Fuck off, Rand.

5
Averon 5 points ago +5 / -0

If they are damaging federal property or attacking federal employees, of course federal police will get involved.

5
keepwinning 5 points ago +5 / -0

he's right. Fortunately his position/concern doesn't match the facts on the ground.

these are federal LEO's protecting FEDERAL buildings which they have every right to do. they are also rounding up ANTIFA agitators/leaders/terrorrists which have been designated as a domestic terror organization, which changes the rules of engagement significantly.

5
DeafMute 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are no libertarians in war.

3
Mikeyy5000 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keyword is "should " Rand, but they are not. Nobody cut in line to deal with this.

2
Morgoth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literally posting a hotair article? He thinks he is appealing to his libertarian base but we aren't on board with this shit.

1
sustainable_saltmine 1 point ago +3 / -2

Rand the cuck makes a comeback.

Secret police are what's needed to nab these fuckers. If the local cops won't do it and the Guard won't the Feds SHOULD. I'm sick of hearing how half these rioters have American Citizenship. FUCK THEIR CITIZENSHIP. They are advocating and participating in an armed insurrection to overthrow the government. it MUST be dealt with and put down

1
eyerighteye 1 point ago +2 / -1

Secret police? How about Trump just declairs an open insurection and deals with it?

The Constitution provides remedy. Nothing Rand said was improper.

1
TrumpVoter1 1 point ago +2 / -1

He's right but what do you do when those places refuse to act?

I support libertarians but in no way do i want them in charge. They go too far and most of their beliefs cannot work well in the real world

1
eyerighteye 1 point ago +1 / -0

Declair an open insurection and deal with it. Arresting those who prevent police from acting is well within POTUS's purview.

1
TrumpVoter1 1 point ago +1 / -0

The insurrection act being called in an election year is a potentially dangerous thing, especially if it gets bloody which you know the leftists would attempt to do to hurt POTUS

1
eyerighteye 1 point ago +1 / -0

November cannot get here quick enough.

1
TrumpVoter1 1 point ago +1 / -0

agreed

1
27Sandino 1 point ago +1 / -0

aT wiLL