5706
Comments (372)
sorted by:
398
Tryhardneckbeard 398 points ago +401 / -3

FUCKIN YUUUUUUGGGGGEEEEEE

Whats sad thought is that this shit is gonna go all the way to the Supreme Court...

349
McFatty7 [S] 349 points ago +351 / -2

Hawaii Judge has entered the chat.

165
deleted 165 points ago +165 / -0
74
deleted 74 points ago +75 / -1
58
williammcfadden 58 points ago +59 / -1

Trump immediately commented after his Supreme Court "loss" that now he has tremendous power given to him. Good thing he's prez and not Hilldog.

21
Wtf_socialismreally 21 points ago +21 / -0

Maybe they're playing the long game by instilling the presidency with larger power and reach, biding their time until they can get another Democrat in office (via cheating).

15
scarletpaladin 15 points ago +15 / -0

that thought is gonna give me nightmares tonight

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sorry. I have so little faith in the left and anyone they decide to put into office (because obviously their primaries are a sham)

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
Rothbard 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is certainly the plan. It was the plan before Trump he is just a road block. Once he is removed they can get back to their old tricks. The Rinos will help.

13
tooeasy4lyfe 13 points ago +13 / -0

For anyone out of the loop. The supreme court ruled the administration pretty much went out about in the wrong way. Which is why they're refilling for it. Setting a precedent for future immigration cases to come I think, correct me if I'm wrong.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
8
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think Trump could sign an EO reversing DACA but prefacing it with "This will leave DACA in place, as is, but' then go on to describe the reverse of the DACA EO. These are the kinds of word games our useless SC has us playing.

3
byteplumber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could an EO be used for something like firearm confiscation? Ammo registration?

4
Ben45 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yea but who'll be prez after him? Too much power for one person.

116
OGpsywar 116 points ago +119 / -3

Lefties are lining up, even as we speak, to get suckered by Geotus into arguing for counting illegal aliens, LMAO

Like there wasn't Already a DNC-Ending 60 point Swing of Black AND Hispanic voters since the 2016, .. which Trump won Without them.

They're sure to love hearing about even moar illegals firehosing in and being given equal / preferential status by the collapsing Blue cities. 😆

The Dems should probably slander Jesus Christ some more while they're at it .. 😄🤣

37
MegoThor 37 points ago +37 / -0

Lefties are lining up, even as we speak, to get suckered by Geotus into arguing for counting illegal aliens,

Again! They already fell all over themselves when he correctly stated that illegals shouldn’t be counted in the Census at all.

16
GreyGooseDown 16 points ago +16 / -0

Anyone got them Portland Vans?

13
Savage2000 13 points ago +13 / -0

We need RVs for this haul

12
Hangemhigh64 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just use a dump truck. You can call it a Trump truck.

6
chahn1138 6 points ago +6 / -0

SCOOPS!

Dear Lord, can I see some Scoops in action once before I pass?!?

Amen!

14
TentElephant 14 points ago +14 / -0

They don't want to divide people by forcing then to self-identify as their racial category, instead of uniting of them through citizenship and assimilation. The racial queastions need to be removed from all government forms and replaced with immigration status.

23
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yup. On twitter they're already going on and on about how "racist" this is.

Because there's nothing racist about assuming all illegal (criminal) aliens are non-white. These are the same morons who espouse I'm a racist for refusing to agree that non-whites are a lesser-class because I have "white privilege."

5
Sumsuch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why won't you white supremacists just accept the fact that white people are fundamentally advantaged?

5
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're so brave for speaking up for these POC who need our voice now more than ever. After all, they're far too stupid to even get a state ID.

10
EpicPede 10 points ago +12 / -2

What exactly are you saying? Are you trying to claim that illegals will vote for Trump?

31
SneakyWino 31 points ago +34 / -3

No, he's saying that minorities here legally are sick of the illegals getting all the freebies and that the legals will vote for Trump.

13
EpicPede 13 points ago +28 / -15

oh well thats also ridiculous. Whites are the only group that vote majority conservative and its not even close.

27
unicornpoop 27 points ago +30 / -3

I lived in Dallas for 5 years. Hispanics are so politically retarded they have NO idea how anything works or what's going on. They vote D because they are told that they will get more free stuff, which is true. They are not "sick of illegals." They want more of their kind over here by any means, and want the working middle class to pay for it. Don't kid yourself. Hispanics are not voting for Trump, regardless of how much of an ass the D party makes of itself.

27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
3
suckmycorona 3 points ago +4 / -1

So let them go about their lives and live in a shithole. People who are educated and want a better life will rise to the challenge. There will always be people in society that just want free stuff. And those are the crumbs that gets sprinkled around for political power. Just look where the politicians live version the people they so called represent.

1
EpicPede 1 point ago +4 / -3

Amen

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
17
EpicPede 17 points ago +17 / -0

I can definitely see that happening

1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tactical misstep. Should've gone all in on the conservative middle class white voter. IdcsvT

12
OGpsywar 12 points ago +13 / -1

Secondary factions don't have to vote 'majority' for Trump .. in order to make a Massive shift.

GoP usually has (in year-over-year 'normal' Dem votefraud numbers) 5% Black voters. Hispanics are all over the place. To pick an average out of the mix I'd call it 11% Hispanic support.

But in Active voters, any 1% switch in support is taken from One side and Added to the Other side.

A 1% switch makes a 2% difference (in that demographic)

A 5% switch makes a 10% difference (in that demographic)

It adds up quickly.

Trump won in 2016 with the usual 5% Black support. The Dems were reported to Homeland Security for trying to hack the vote count of 16 states, they did their usual wait-till-Red-counties-are-final before finding "uncounted" Blue ballots routine, they ran every classic cheat, .. and Trump won Anyway.

Since Then -- Trump's Black support has skyrocketed from 5% to 37%. Some polls went as high as 41%. Hispanic increases were similar.

Every point of switch weights Twice.

Mathematically, the Democrats are over as a national party. They're incapable of winning an Honest election .. even with their normal fraud methods.

This is why: cities were on fire, .. anyone who's not a seditionist is being deplatformed, .. coronahoaxus (plummeting in virulence every week for over 3 months until it's barely 1/3rd as dangerous as normal-flu) is going to "kill us all" unless we wear cloth masks and accept tracking-bracelets to leave our homes, .. the Globos are holding secret continuity of government meetings, .. and Pelosi is speaking openly about removing Trump from office ("fumigating him out" - like vermin) using Military Force.

Anway, SneakyWino's on it .. legal minorities, better-known as Americans 🇺🇸, are sick of the Dem's shit and it's primed to landslide for Trump, bigly.

So, anything will be on the table for August: riots, assassinations, false flags, nukes, 🤷‍♂️ as Dems / Globos claw to keep power.

3
bill_in_texas 3 points ago +4 / -1

Numbers are waaay off. If you think Trump will get 37% of the black vote, well, that's just not realistic, even as much as we think it should be that or more, based on his results.

The Dem. plantation system is VERY entrenched, and the overseers know what the fuck they are doing. Remember how Biden won the nomination? It was the black overseer in one state, Clyburn, that made that happen for Joe. Look at John Lewis. He held his people in lock step, right up until he died.

That kind of system isn't going to be undone in 8 years. If Trump gets over 12%, I will see it as a victory. If he got 20%, I'd tell you the Republicans finally got in the game and just cheated with mail in ballots or something. .

2
EpicPede 2 points ago +10 / -8

The voting trends won't change in 2020. Message me if im wrong. Only whites vote for conservatives. Legal immigrants don't care about the stuff you mentioned. They will vote for biden and hope to bring more of their kind here to ruin the country.

Honestly your thinking is a decade old. Time to catch up.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +15 / -3
7
EpicPede 7 points ago +7 / -0

ok based. lol

8
sagebrushfire 8 points ago +11 / -3

This. Some narratives never seem to die. Been hearing this same claptrap since the_donald. Hispanics legal or otherwise, will vote hand in hand with their democratic handlers. Same for blacks.

5
2016TrumpMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

True, but if we can get over 40% of the Hispanic vote, and over 25% of the black vote, the D party is DEAD.

2
EpicPede 2 points ago +6 / -4

Absolutely. The brainwashing has been extremely effective even here. we have to just keep reminding people of these simple facts, don't let up

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
OGpsywar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interestingly, I doubted this would be doable because the Lefties had mass-published nonsense (cloaking) articles more recently .. so that anyone trying to access those parametrics would only find their spam.

That's what I ran into the last time I tried to find this.

But .. turns out a second round of polls have been repeated even More recently than the spam .. so here are 2 from this June, and even an older original one from last October.

I'm glad you asked👍

https://www.wnd.com/2020/06/rasmussen-black-approval-trump-surges-40/
. . . . . . .
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/winning-trump-approval-rate-41-among-likely-black-voters/
. . . . . . .
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/boom-trump-approval-up-to-42-with-black-males-makes-2020-election-impossible-for-democrats/

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Dilligaf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yesyesyes

12
RedDon 12 points ago +12 / -0

Aloha judge, aloha justice.

9
NomadicKrow 9 points ago +9 / -0

Aw man, he could have his own TV show called Aloha Justice. He spends the entire episode completely divorced from the mainland and any understanding of the situation, then rules in whatever favor helps democrats. Every episode!

3
rooftoptendie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whenever an injunction is needed, HE'LL BE THERE!

3
MudDog 3 points ago +3 / -0

9th Circus has already ruled that illegal votes count for 5 votes

1
lank23 1 point ago +1 / -0

lmao.....

78
Afrikaner_Vrystaat 78 points ago +78 / -0

What's sad is the uncertainty surrounding what should be a clear supreme court verdict.

What's the point of conservative justices if they are like Roberts? Fuck him.

64
FliesTheFlag 64 points ago +64 / -0

Roberts is a piece of shit, closet homosexual who illegally adopted his kids from Ireland through Brazil.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
5
ralphw 5 points ago +5 / -0

...or worse

35
Tryhardneckbeard 35 points ago +35 / -0

Roberts was a "Moderate" from when Bush "Reached across the aisle" and got fucked in the ass.

29
Afrikaner_Vrystaat 29 points ago +29 / -0

Everything GW touches glows. I'm not one bit surprised.

4
Commiesarenotpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think Thomas is the only one that hasn't recently fucked us over.

3
rooftoptendie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's clone him. Eleven times.

40
ciaramella_is_gay 40 points ago +40 / -0

RGB won't make it to the end of the year, hopefully she holds it together until the election to keep the libs from coming out in force to try and sway it, but once she's out of the way cucky ass roberts will be less important.

But this shouldn't even be an issue, they're fucking illegal.

49
deleted 49 points ago +49 / -0
28
ciaramella_is_gay 28 points ago +28 / -0

that's why we need to keep the senate and win the house, push our SCOTUS pick through and fix the shit out of this country

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

The left is silly. So what if someone ridicules you? If someone is a dick, they're a dick. Dicks are everywhere. If you're trans and someone doesn't like it, the solution isn't to cancel their life or attack them, it's to either stand up for yourself and have a dick response or remove yourself from the situation entirely.

As long as you aren't being denied jobs for strictly your sexuality or race or gender, then you have the same rights as any of us. I hate that the left has twisted this.

3
IntrepidBurger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hopefully it happens really soon. Trump having time to replace her would completely kill Democrat morale for November

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
8
WhiskeyAndCoffee 8 points ago +8 / -0

And if it actually passes then that would be a YUGE win

129
KeepTheFaith 129 points ago +130 / -1

"HOW DO YOU KNOW IF THERE ARE ILLEGALS!?"

"Youre right, lets count :)"

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
119
deleted 119 points ago +121 / -2
114
Art-Vandelay41 114 points ago +114 / -0

I don’t understand why there are people out there in Trump’s base saying “well I’ll sit my ass at home on Election Day cause Trump banned the bump stock he isn’t pro 2-A or Trump is allowing DACA amnesty.”

Trump is still Trump. We gotta show up November 3

72
BananaWizard 72 points ago +72 / -0

Trump said he would follow the nra to the T. Nra said ban it so he did. He literally did what he said he was going to do.

92
TankedCommandeerer 92 points ago +92 / -0

Which is why you should support the Gun Owners of America instead of the NRA. The NRA has been corrupted and gives too much ground.

35
ComradeSanders 35 points ago +35 / -0

☝🏻Yep

14
BetoForPrez 14 points ago +14 / -0

I agree. Infringement is infringement.

4
rooftoptendie 4 points ago +4 / -0

The NRA has not really done much this past 4 years to stand up for our rights. What's the point of being a member if theyre just going to waste your money for you?

3
aClue 3 points ago +4 / -1

WHO GIVES A FUCK. YOU ARE THROWING THE BABY OUT WITH THE BATHWATER IF YOU DONT VOTE TRUMP

2
anon1011101 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every sane individual has to vote for Trump at all costs. There is no more "good faith debate" between the Left and Right. The Left hates the founding principles of the US and wants to destroy it. They have to be completely removed from public discourse and the Democratic party has to be destroyed, by force if necessary.

1
TankedCommandeerer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can vote Trump and still donate to the GOA.

16
OnlySlightlyNaughty 16 points ago +21 / -5

I don’t disagree with the bump stock ban in spirit. It is designed to do one thing. I do take an issue with anyone who says that shit is effective in combat. Sure, if you trained with it a lot, but the mass shooting nonsense is already by crazies who usually shouldn’t have had a firearm in the first place. If you are going to do that much planning there are better more illegal ways to go full auto.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
Lurkmoar347 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can replicate the effect of a bump stock with a shoelace if you know what you’re doing.

2
OnlySlightlyNaughty 2 points ago +3 / -1

I can also modify or build a lower for full auto. It really isn’t worth the risk and if I want to get into that club I could buy my way in.

Remember the full auto trigger inserts? Those are just as easy to build. I have no intention too. I can barely get on paper as it is ;)

3
Commiesarenotpeople 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can buy your way in if you want to go through the trouble of starting and running a related business in addition to all the other hoops you will have to jump through.

That sounds like an infringement to me.

1
OnlySlightlyNaughty 1 point ago +2 / -1

You go fight the good fight with the ATF.

I’ve seen what people go through to recover a serial. It’s ridiculously expensive.

Again legit or otherwise it’s not something I’ll waste time or money on. It might be a worth while cause if we can a few generations of republican control. Bigger problems today.

10
Art-Vandelay41 10 points ago +10 / -0

“When a President goes through those White House doors and does what he says he’ll do, we’ll all be drinkin that free bubble up, and eating that Rainbow Stew.”

We’re gettin our rainbow stew boys

30
maga_machinist 30 points ago +30 / -0

While he has made some decisions I don't agree with, that is no reason to throw away my support of the man. No one is perfect and nobody can please everybody in America 100% of the time. Some people seem to forget that. A small difference in opinion is no reason to give the degeneracy of the left a chance and controlling the USA once again because if they do get that power, I have a feeling America will be forever changed and not for the good.

20
OnlySlightlyNaughty 20 points ago +20 / -0

100%

We are going to disagree. We are people.

I think for a lot of us we find some common ground in POTUS doing another run.

13
DaLaohu 13 points ago +13 / -0

The Leftists ally with Islam, for crying out loud. How is it that Rightists have such a problem with making allies and purity spiraling?

7
Chiliad5 7 points ago +7 / -0

Absolutely. I disagree with my own wife 10% of the time. That doesn't mean I'm going to divorce her and marry Rashida Tlaib.

3
rooftoptendie 3 points ago +3 / -0

good freakin argument!

18
Modus_Pwninz 18 points ago +18 / -0

Bumpstocks are amateur hour anyway. It's all about coat hanger auto-sears now.

9
TankedCommandeerer 9 points ago +10 / -1

Those have always been an option but you'll get 10 years in prison for even making one. When shit hits the fan and the ATF have better things to worry about though it would be wise of everyone to know what one of those looks like.

8
NomadicKrow 8 points ago +8 / -0

Why can the GayTF make laws anyway? How can they say "this is this" and it's law?

1
anon1011101 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gun laws don't phase me. I used to live in a gun-friendly state and purchased a lot of firearms that are forbidden in the faggot cuck state I moved to. They stay locked in a separate room under the bed. Literally nobody is going to bother me about them, until it's time to actually use them for realsies.

4
3
TankedCommandeerer 3 points ago +3 / -0

^ This is the way to go. A good binary trigger is now faster than a standard full auto https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgxTiMp0P5I

1
4
Modus_Pwninz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't worry, my doggo knows not to go to the door, which is protected by Ivan, a mannequin filled with tannerite and ball bearings in full tacticool gear, holding an airsoft rifle.

Ivan will not drop the gun. Please don't shoot Ivan.

2
anon1011101 2 points ago +2 / -0

A hilarious and also effective idea. My house has a large front porch under which I could probably pack a dozen 55 gallon drums full of tannerite. Do the fedbois really wanna play that game?

16
2SmoothGQ 16 points ago +16 / -0

Ya I whole heartedly disagree with the smoking age 21 thing. If you’re an adult at 18 you’re an adult. If you aren’t then you aren’t. Choose an age for everything and stick to it. That being said he has done way more good than bad and I salute him for what he deals with on a daily basis.

11
HeavenlyTrumpets 11 points ago +11 / -0

21 should be age to be legally an adult imo....

kids younger than that shouldn't be signing longterm contracts on anything, shouldn't be voting (tbh) and shouldn't be ingesting alcohol or smoking.

My only caveat would be, if you are in the military, you get to vote.

11
AngryWriter 11 points ago +11 / -0

Service Guarantees Citizenship.

3
Truthdose 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like it guarantees America first(like Crenshaw)

9
2SmoothGQ 9 points ago +9 / -0

See you wouldn’t need a caveat then. No military until age 21. If an 18 year old isn’t responsible enough to vote they aren’t responsible enough to sign on the dotted line. Now that being said. 21 for everything works for me.

5
Lysah 5 points ago +5 / -0

I would agree with 21 for everything, but the problem comes with kids who have deadbeat parents, or parents who have deadbeat kids and want to separate on the kid's 18th birthday. Now they have to wait 3 more years for no particular reason? If the kid isn't going to college, that's 3 years of just wasting time and sitting around at home because they're a "minor" still.

And that's not to mention kids who are mature at 18 and ready to go live on their own. Kids who are more than happy to learn a trade and start working before they're 21 and don't need college. But if we make the legal age 21, those kids run into unnecessary road blocks.

Personally I think the good outweighs the bad, for the most part, but I don't think it's such an obvious answer.

3
HeavenlyTrumpets 3 points ago +3 / -0

how bout they can train in military at 18... but not see battle til 21. 21 seems too late to start military training to me.

1
rooftoptendie 1 point ago +1 / -0

That sounds awesome. They could sign up and train and get more schooling, and at 21 be eligible for combat misssions.

13
Dr0neRec0very 13 points ago +15 / -2

Very strongly suspect conservatives who are extreme enough to refuse voting due to the bump-stock thing (that doesn't even ban a firearm, as far as I know), while facing a MARXIST Congress and possible MARXIST president are dangerously stupid and unknowingly directed by opposition. On youtube, for example, when that was a hot issue, I would occasionally catch one of those well-recognized, everyday marxist trolls shouting 'Trump banned bump-stocks! He lost my vote!'

2
Amaroq64 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've seen a lot of that shit about Ted Cruz. It must be a troll.

They always post on Cruz's stuff going "what kind of a man lets donald trump insult his wife? He lost my vote!"

0
Dr0neRec0very 0 points ago +2 / -2

I guess we'd better get some twitter/facebook accounts set up and just make "lost my vote" comments to Marxist bureaucrats. :)

7
Toughsky_Shitsky 7 points ago +13 / -6

If you think the lefties are gonna just give up after this EO then you haven't been paying attention.

The left has sold out our country. Letting pliant illegals play a significant roll in our political process, at every level and in every way, is the left's main weapon.

This will be challenged within a week .. in front of an 0bama appointed judge, who has already been shopped.

The left wants to destroy America .. and they have a plan, they are relentless, and they play to win.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
94
Scottdelia 94 points ago +96 / -2

Why does this even need to exist? Shouldn't this be self-evident?!

36
Seruna_Kanus 36 points ago +37 / -1

3/5th Compromise. It should be self-evident, but it wasn't even when the constitution was drawn up.

8
Mexicola1976 8 points ago +9 / -1

It was self evident that slaves should have been counted towards population/representation?

17
ADAM_SCHITT 17 points ago +17 / -0

They should not have been counted at all if they considered them "property."

10
Seruna_Kanus 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm speaking in the context of the above poster's comment. Slaves shouldn't have been counted as they were not actually being represented, and were, by definition, property. We don't base representation on number of houses or cars, or livestock owned. Likewise most laws enacted under the Constitution wouldn't have much impact on a slave as they were governed by state laws and by their owners whims. The only federal law that could really affect a slave was gaining the right to vote and emancipation. The later better offered before the former.

4
williammcfadden 4 points ago +4 / -0

Illegals actually are citizens, of another country not the US.

Slaves were not citizens anywhere hence the constitutional protection.

3
Amaroq64 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was just diplomacy. They didn't want the south to be able to just buy political power by buying more slaves, but they still needed the south onboard.

23
irspow 23 points ago +23 / -0

Poor wording in Constitution is the problem here. Census was to count ‘all persons’. It does not specify ‘citizens’. Though there may be a way to justify not counting illegals. Indians were excluded because they didn’t pay taxes. The same argument may include illegals if it applied to indians. I am definitely not a lawyer though. 😀

29
JonahND 29 points ago +29 / -0

It says "all persons" because our founding fathers assumed that illegals would be thrown out in the first place....

15
irspow 15 points ago +15 / -0

I would agree with that premise. The idea is to distribute representatives and non-citizens have no right to representation.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +4 / -8
7
DuplexFields 7 points ago +8 / -1

They can get counted in the census; they just won't get counted for making voting districts. Come in illegally, you're a squatter and a guest of wherever you're squatting, which has a vote proportional to its citizens and other legal residents.

0
deleted 0 points ago +5 / -5
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
ladypatriot_games 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is really interesting that it says “adding to the whole number of free persons” and not citizens. It does seem to put it at odds with the subsequent constitutional amendments addressing voting rights, which did use “citizens”.

3
DuplexFields 3 points ago +3 / -0

There was a period of time where not every person was free, not every free person was a citizen, and not every citizen could vote.

1
irspow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to get all tin foil hat but free persons are different than citizens. People have rights, citizens are ‘subjects’ with privileges.

2
roberteats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Feather or dot?

2
TD_WIN2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Heads up here, the amendment sent to the senate that concerns this statement originally had “citizen” in it instead of “whole persons”. It was changed to “whole persons” because they wanted to include noncitizens who were in the process of becoming citizens, with illegal alien numbers being thrown out and not counted.

http://www.federalistblog.us/2006/03/do_aliens_really_count_towards__apportionment/

9
MuadDon 9 points ago +9 / -0

Have you seen Congress? 90% of our federal legislative body are crooks who think themselves quasi aristocrats in a medieval court, all paid for by our tax dollars.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
66
South_Florida_Guy 66 points ago +66 / -0

CA should lose about 10% or more of their electoral votes and House reps if we actually ONLY counted legal residents.

28
deleted 28 points ago +30 / -2
28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
9
jennyfrutex 9 points ago +9 / -0

Honestly, let's hold out and see if CA's worth annexing again.

7
Cray_cray_ 7 points ago +7 / -0

Let's bring that wall up and around first.

5
Lurkmoar347 5 points ago +5 / -0

CA secedes, runs out of water within a month, and starts begging for gibs.

Unfortunately it won’t happen.

13
white_redoubt 13 points ago +13 / -0

Texas would lose just as many.

9
MakeAmericaLegendary 9 points ago +9 / -0

Take them. I have no problem with losing our illegal representatives so long as the other states do too.

8
Tallsie 8 points ago +8 / -0

Can we get tax paying citizen listed as the metric for voting and representation? No taxation without representation, should also mean the inverse

6
South_Florida_Guy 6 points ago +6 / -0

If that were the case, I'd be getting hella represented up my ass every quarter and year!

6
edxzxz 6 points ago +6 / -0

And they'll lose federal funding for schools etc., which will end the fed (and all taxpayers) from continuing to subsidize the leftarded giveaways to illegal aliens. Only when the dumbass taxpayers of dumbass liberal states are forced to pay the full brunt of the expense of their dumbass giveaway programs will they finally realize it has to end.

54
Wrexxis780 54 points ago +55 / -1

Hawaii judge incoming...

16
ADAM_SCHITT 16 points ago +16 / -0

Followed by John Roberts...

50
Loc12 50 points ago +50 / -0

The fact that this isn't just the default position is mind blowing to me

12
Psilocybik 12 points ago +12 / -0

When you understand that liberals hate this country and want our way of life destroyed, it all makes sense.

39
ParticleCannon 39 points ago +39 / -0

The end of Josemandering

8
Wheredidiputit 8 points ago +8 / -0

KEK

6
BetsyRossRocks 6 points ago +6 / -0

R. I. P. Trader Jose

29
deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
23
RivalPipe 23 points ago +23 / -0

You cannot reward law breakers.

This should be straight-forward, but Dems and soft dick RINOs will moan.

15
Seruna_Kanus 15 points ago +15 / -0

it's the 3/5th Compromise situation all over again, and just like back when the Framers were debating the rules of the constitution, the slaveholders wanted to to count the slaves for representation.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
12
lifeisahologram 12 points ago +12 / -0

I think Reagan would have if we knew recognized the true extent of the communist infiltration of America.

McCarthy warmed us and very few believed him. Reagan even accepted amnesty before the wall was built because he had a good heart and didn’t realize the threat we were facing.

But if Reagan understood what we know now, he would have been just like Trump.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
21
Pelosi_Halitosis 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is great news until some leftist twit judge runs an injunction.

20
thunder_wasp 20 points ago +20 / -0

I suspect he's getting closer to "let him enforce it" territory. District judges have been unconstitutionally abusing their power for years by way of nationwide injunctions and should not have authority to issue injunctions outside of their districts.

7
Pelosi_Halitosis 7 points ago +7 / -0

Judicial activism has no place in our society. A counterclaim should not warrant emergency injunctions without first having direct proof of, malicious harm or ongoing loss of life.

17
global_cafeous 17 points ago +17 / -0

He did say it was going to be an exciting 8 weeks on Friday.

1
Donnybiceps 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think Trump is back on the offensive and is gonna stop being on the defensive especially in regards to the Chinese virus. It's go time.

3
Seruna_Kanus 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's gonna happen, sure, but then Trump's lawyers can fight it all the way to the Supreme Court. It's beautiful that the President can declare that he will enforce existing laws. It's beautiful that someone can take an existing law to court. It's beautiful that said law can be argued.

Not that I'm against Trumps Executive Orders, I'm just glad that in our country, all of this process remains available. Trump knows it, and likely has his team ready before he officially puts out the EO cause he expects opposition in the courts.

18
iouybiy 18 points ago +18 / -0

Hopefully he called it the John Roberts Census Question Executive Order

15
TexasPiper 15 points ago +15 / -0

Won’t matter in a couple years cause there ain’t gonna be any! Mass deportations coming second term!

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
5
ProfessorRomendev 5 points ago +5 / -0

Step juan: build the wall.

Step dos: deport juan

4
jennyfrutex 4 points ago +4 / -0

Step tres: import CHYNA IS ASSHOE guy

2
CaliPede24601 2 points ago +2 / -0

Step cuatro: Make Hong Kong a US territory

12
Imransgarage 12 points ago +12 / -0

Let’s prevent them from breaking the law.

11
Ligersrule1 11 points ago +11 / -0

How many house seats will this cost CA and NY?

8
iVote 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not enough.

5
edxzxz 5 points ago +5 / -0

EO doesn't specifically name California, but it does say that 'one state' has 2.2 million illegal aliens which is over 6% of its population and would lose 2 or 3 house seats.

2
CaliPede24601 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a Californian, hopefully double digits

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
10
Formerlurker92 10 points ago +10 / -0

This shouldn't make me as excited as it does. It's amazing how many basic things he has done to improve the situation

10
SpaceTiger 10 points ago +10 / -0

THANK YOU!!!

10
RedDon 10 points ago +10 / -0

Anyone noticing these EOs are for things that should totally not NEED them? Like the statues one and the 1A one for colleges or whatever. Why the hell would you ever count illegal aliens for a census? Damn libs.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
Seruna_Kanus 6 points ago +6 / -0

3/5th Compromise because: Your only value to us is the power you give us, and nothing more.

Funny thing, I wonder how many BLM understand the message exists the same in their movement. They only have support from the left because of the power that BLM could bring them.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
runonce 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Trump later signed an executive order to get an accurate count of citizens and non-citizens present in the country"

8
MythArcana 8 points ago +8 / -0

Now you know why California would not surrender their voter rolls.

8
ImportantPerson 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wonder which lower court is going to rule against this. No chance of if lasting even a week even though it's clearly a rational order to uphold.

8
Seruna_Kanus 8 points ago +8 / -0

This shoulda been obvious from the 3/5th Compromise. The left cannot use their slaves to buffer their representation.

7
CheckorHold 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why does that even require an EO?

6
mikejones 6 points ago +6 / -0

America has been invaded when you see the top democrats pushing a lot of this Anti-American crap have been in politics for 40+ years.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Seruna_Kanus 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of EOs reinforce existing laws. It's the Executive Branch's duty to oversee the execution of laws. An EO is at the least a declaration that the branch will focus enforce a law. If the law doesn't exist but should and Congress isn't doing anything about it, the Executive Office can declare the law. The law can in turn be quickly fought in court to provide the Check and Balance.

As for why this particular EO is required, well the left wants to count its imported number to fluff up it's power in its populated areas. Likewise the left is spreading their imported numbers out to try and enforce their ideologies in the less centralized locations. This EO will gut most of that.

6
Flak 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's important to frame this as FOREIGN NATIONALS being given voting representation. Illegal immigrants are viewed by the left as second class US residents, it's important to drive home the point that they are ALSO citizens of a foreign country, not just "nationless" transients.

6
BarackObongo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Que in the "XENOPHOBIC!!!" REEEEES NOW!!!

6
Seruna_Kanus 6 points ago +6 / -0

What's xenophobic about it? We can have illegals from the UK, from France, from Germany. We could have illegals from Canada. It affects all illegal aliens equally. Legal aliens who register to vote and can show their immigration papers, visa, naturalization, etc. are not negatively affected by this.

3
BarackObongo 3 points ago +3 / -0

The left will scream "xenophobia". Again. It was sarcasm.

2
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 2 points ago +2 / -0

How dare you. This nation will always be racist until white people all agree that criminal illegals are POC and that POC are a lesser-class because white people have special privilege.

6
CaptRied 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just what in the hell have the republican (they don't deserve a capital R) lawmakers been doing these past decades?!? Why was this every allowed?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
NotoriousCIC 5 points ago +5 / -0

Birthright citizenship should have been tackled within the first year of his presidency and nothing happened. That’s one of the biggest problems. Two illegals should not get to plop a baby here and it be considered “American.” Eff that. I’m against any immigration any more. We are full. Eff off back to your third world.

2
YuriBezmenov 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. Country is already lost anyway dude, demographics are beyond repair.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's far worse than that, my friend. There are countless foreign travel agencies all over the world that specialize in flying pregnant women to the US (during the end of their pregnancy) so they have their baby here and the baby gets duel citizenship. The numbers are staggering.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Other than the "chosen people" are there any other duel citizens that vote in our election as well as their "birthright" nation? I can't think of any...

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
EntilZha 5 points ago +5 / -0

Paging Hawaiian Judge, Hawaiian Judge please pick up a DNC curtesy phone.

5
Bedminster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here señor I have a drivers license I'm leeeeeegal..

5
mateus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good. Someone, please tell Ann Coulter.

sigh

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's too busy screaming into her pillow that Trump isn't building the wall fast enough.

5
eddieblasphemy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Get fucked u globalist schills. No representation without taxation

4
Samuel311fan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Liberal tears incoming

4
Nibba 4 points ago +4 / -0

It makes me so mad that they know who these illegal aliens are and where they are but will not deport them. The fact that an order had to be signed to not count these aliens as citizens is just embarrassing.

4
Deplorable_in_PA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Am I understanding this correctly? States like California with lots of illegals want them included as "citizens" so they can get more congressional districts or more reps. Kind of like the 3/5's bit with the south and slaves? But Trump shut them down on it?

2
residue69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget electoral college votes!

4
Joe_Yuma 4 points ago +4 / -0

This guy tiene los cojones bien puesto!

4
mikejones 4 points ago +4 / -0

Reading Twitter I'm thinking either way this turns out it's going to be a war. The side that loses will say it was a cheated and rigged election.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
BigFree 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is MASSIVE and it took balls of steel. Round of applause.

4
edxzxz 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's already SCOTUS precedent for the proposition that since illegal aliens are allowed by most (all?) states to be enrolled in public schools, and since the feds kick money to the states to fund schools based on the number of students enrolled, and because congresspeople represent all the people in their districts - legal or illegal - then illegals must be included in determining how many legislative districts and the parameters of those districts. This is why Maxine Waters and Ilhan Omar can get elected - their districts have a tiny handful of legal voters plus loads and loads of illegals / non citizens. Mad Maxine's district is loaded with Haitians who are here legally due to being allowed 'temporary' refuge from the Haitian earthquakes long long ago, but they aren't citizens, so Maxine can get elected in a district with only a very small number of actual legal voters. This EO will fail at the SCOTUS. I assume POTUS Trump knows that and is merely using this to rope-a-dope the dems into screeching about it and bringing the issue out into the open so normal people can see what's going on.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
global_cafeous 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagine the REEEEEEs from the left when they realize how many illegals are here.

3
ValleyForge 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fact that he has to sign an order for this is absolutely pathetic and shameful to our once great nation. Our founders are rolling in their graves.

3
BarneyFranksNipples 3 points ago +3 / -0

The idea that this is even remotely controversial to anyone is sincerely mind blowing.

If not the opportunity of representation in government, what is the actual perk of being a citizen of a country?

3
here2red 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alright!!! Did Dems head explode yet?