The uniparty voted 196-0 in the House against impeachment?
The uniparty voted 52-1 in the Senate against removal from office?
The uniparty in the Senate confirmed both Neil Gorsuch and Bret Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, amid the deafening demonic shrieks of the underworld from the left-wing nutjobs?
The uniparty in the Senate confirmed nearly 300 federal judges deliberately handpicked by Trump to uphold the Constitution rather than legislate from the bench?
How easy would it have been in the case of the judges to flex those uniparty muscles?
User name checks out? :)
Look I'm just saying, parroting the word uniparty when it doesn't fit the facts and is actually embarrassing to the facts gets us nowhere IMHO
Why it matters
Besides the obvious, the only thing that matters is retaking the House and holding the Senate. If we don't get the House it's another four years of obstruction, impeachment, gridlock. God help us if we don't hold the Senate too: Trump will be removed from office illicitly as part of the ongoing coup d'état. A Constitutional crisis awaits if we don't get this right. So:
What's more likely to get Republicans instead of dems elected to the House and Senate in Nov.?
(a) Fostering the idea in the mind of the voters that it doesn't really matter if they vote Republican, or at all, because uniparty, so why bother? Or
(b) drawing a clear and unmistakable distinction in voters' minds between republicans and democrats (hardcore Marxist socialists)—plus creating a sense of urgency to get out and vote for the former in all congressional races?
The uniparty voted 196-0 in the House against impeachment?
The uniparty voted 52-1 in the Senate against removal from office?
The uniparty in the Senate confirmed both Neil Gorsuch and Bret Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, amid the deafening demonic shrieks of the underworld from the left-wing nutjobs?
The uniparty in the Senate confirmed nearly 300 federal judges deliberately handpicked by Trump to uphold the Constitution rather than legislate from the bench?
How easy would it have been in the case of the judges to flex those uniparty muscles?
User name checks out? :)
Look I'm just saying, parroting the word uniparty when it doesn't fit the facts and is actually embarrassing to the facts gets us nowhere IMHO
Why it matters
Besides the obvious, the only thing that matters is retaking the House and holding the Senate. If we don't get the House it's another four years of obstruction, impeachment, gridlock. God help us if we don't hold the Senate too: Trump will be removed from office illicitly as part of the ongoing coup d'état. A Constitutional crisis awaits if we don't get this right. So:
What's more likely to get Republicans instead of dems elected to the House and Senate in Nov.?
(a) Fostering the idea in the mind of the voters that it doesn't really matter if they vote Republican, or at all, because uniparty, so why bother? Or
(b) drawing a clear and unmistakable distinction in voters' minds between republicans and democrats (hardcore Marxist socialists)—plus creating a sense of urgency to get out and vote for the former in all congressional races?
We are the news now
Thank you. The anti black pill. I needed a dose.
Cheers!
Lots more where that came from :)
Thanks, Mr. Meatbag!
YESSSSS!