Agreed! I wasn’t trying to imply that any or all swing voters are single-issue or “litmus test” driven, only that on the issue of civil unrest people want sanity and not chaos.
I don't think a lot of people buy the narrative that peaceful protesters are being kidnapped by secret police. Only the hardcore tds leftists I know actually believe it. Everyone else I know is saying "what the fuck did they expect?"
Yes, strength and security, not killing people in the streets extrajudiciously.
I think it's a much better tactic to show that the democrat run cities are doing NOTHING to stop this, and the feds are trying but being publicly pushed back from helping these cities. Let the city burn, protect the federal buildings as needed. If you intervene, then people won't see how horrible the democrats are.
Live rounds should be an absolute LAST resort and only if things get way out of hand.
It's like Tim Pool said, if you keep stepping in and fixing the mess your child makes, they'll learn that they can get away with anything and will never become responsible or accountable for their actions.
The theoretical swing voters are looking for strength and security; ending this crap will win them.
Swing voters do not believe or want one thing. That's a trap that the left fell into. We should not.
I would start at the top of this food chain: The people funding it, the senators endorsing it, and the mainstream media pushing it.
Drone strike on Soros, Gitmo for politicians that support this shit......all the way up to Pelosi and Schumer.
Hillary and Obongo get the noose.
Biden gets prison for corruption and bribery.
Agreed! I wasn’t trying to imply that any or all swing voters are single-issue or “litmus test” driven, only that on the issue of civil unrest people want sanity and not chaos.
I don't think a lot of people buy the narrative that peaceful protesters are being kidnapped by secret police. Only the hardcore tds leftists I know actually believe it. Everyone else I know is saying "what the fuck did they expect?"
Yes, strength and security, not killing people in the streets extrajudiciously.
I think it's a much better tactic to show that the democrat run cities are doing NOTHING to stop this, and the feds are trying but being publicly pushed back from helping these cities. Let the city burn, protect the federal buildings as needed. If you intervene, then people won't see how horrible the democrats are.
Live rounds should be an absolute LAST resort and only if things get way out of hand.
It's like Tim Pool said, if you keep stepping in and fixing the mess your child makes, they'll learn that they can get away with anything and will never become responsible or accountable for their actions.