It's not. That one has its own inaccuracies though. Fortunately, Trump decided which company to go with for the PCR testing (or live virus) and he decided to go with 'Abbott'. There are plenty of broadcasts talking about the accuracy of Abbott's devices but nothing compared to the Antibody testing.
The Antibody testing appears to be where the numbers are most manipulated. After sifting through thousands of news segments, it's clear that there is a correlation between the testing of antibodies and the spike in cases (for a particular State). These tests are often given out for free before a spike occurs.
States are also combining the data between the PCR tests and the Antibody tests. All the while saying that the case numbers are what determines the reopening of local economies.
The CDC is also combining these numbers but 'are actively working to separate them'. The numbers they publish are also not real-time numbers. When they report deaths on a particular day, it doesn't mean they occurred in the last 24 hours. It's all about how fast they input the data. The reporting of deaths could be the accumulation of a week's worth of deaths but only reported that day.
So they are using antibody test positives as new case positives...? retarded. Also, if that is how they are reporting death numbers; it is also super retarded that there is ever a "largest deaths on a single day ever" article published.
I would take any one of these anchors over the current MSM... i learned more in a handful of 60 second clips than i have in months from the cable networks.
Honestly, the local reporting is the best. They genuinely care about reporting the truth to their communities. I have a ton of stuff on false positives, not reporting positives, combining numbers, confusion on where the numbers come from, hundreds of faulty kits.. When I started looking into this I didn't think it would be so blatant.
False positives have a greater impact on the stats overall but we can't dismiss false negatives. If an organization is indeed manipulating the numbers, they would want to control both increases and decreases. Antibody test approvals by the FDA were fast tracked so test can come from anywhere. He who provides the kits controls the numbers.
Here's a clip where they announce one of 11 antibody kits approved under emergency measures (no clinical trial): https://streamable.com/2w0mt5
In Canada they blocked their own product from hitting the market because it failed specifically in the clinical trial (@38sec): https://streamable.com/99pgtk
It's not. That one has its own inaccuracies though. Fortunately, Trump decided which company to go with for the PCR testing (or live virus) and he decided to go with 'Abbott'. There are plenty of broadcasts talking about the accuracy of Abbott's devices but nothing compared to the Antibody testing.
The Antibody testing appears to be where the numbers are most manipulated. After sifting through thousands of news segments, it's clear that there is a correlation between the testing of antibodies and the spike in cases (for a particular State). These tests are often given out for free before a spike occurs.
States are also combining the data between the PCR tests and the Antibody tests. All the while saying that the case numbers are what determines the reopening of local economies.
The CDC is also combining these numbers but 'are actively working to separate them'. The numbers they publish are also not real-time numbers. When they report deaths on a particular day, it doesn't mean they occurred in the last 24 hours. It's all about how fast they input the data. The reporting of deaths could be the accumulation of a week's worth of deaths but only reported that day.
Any idea where they're using Antibody vs PCR tests?
You'll have to ask or research the test beforehand. They are different tests.
Here is one of the best clips explaining why we don't know what we're testing for: https://streamable.com/z9t0r1
Here's Trump showcasing Abbott's 5 Minute test: https://streamable.com/7msrs8
and for those still reading this far down.. here's Trump snapping back at a reporter about testing at the White House: https://streamable.com/j3704z
So they are using antibody test positives as new case positives...? retarded. Also, if that is how they are reporting death numbers; it is also super retarded that there is ever a "largest deaths on a single day ever" article published.
Here's where they've been caught combining the numbers:
Georgia: https://streamable.com/khcvsb
Arizona: https://streamable.com/947rz4
Texas: https://streamable.com/3s71ww
Texas: https://streamable.com/zpfrzh
Missouri: https://streamable.com/7ampv6
Here's how they are (sometimes?) reporting deaths:
Florida: https://streamable.com/w89ib2
I would take any one of these anchors over the current MSM... i learned more in a handful of 60 second clips than i have in months from the cable networks.
Honestly, the local reporting is the best. They genuinely care about reporting the truth to their communities. I have a ton of stuff on false positives, not reporting positives, combining numbers, confusion on where the numbers come from, hundreds of faulty kits.. When I started looking into this I didn't think it would be so blatant.
False positives have a greater impact on the stats overall but we can't dismiss false negatives. If an organization is indeed manipulating the numbers, they would want to control both increases and decreases. Antibody test approvals by the FDA were fast tracked so test can come from anywhere. He who provides the kits controls the numbers.
Here's a clip where they announce one of 11 antibody kits approved under emergency measures (no clinical trial): https://streamable.com/2w0mt5
In Canada they blocked their own product from hitting the market because it failed specifically in the clinical trial (@38sec): https://streamable.com/99pgtk
And that Canadian device appears to be used in the United States: https://streamable.com/4glinv
Here are a couple of the FREE Antibody test reports:
New York: https://streamable.com/dlul9m
Texas: https://streamable.com/4izdbz