Talking about past history being an indicator of future possibility.
Although i guess thats just foolish, cause instead i should assume that after x amount of years they must be a better person.
If there is risk, and your good with it, then great for you. I take my own risk assesment seriously. And believe it to be a risky bet. My opinion. Dont like, don't care.
Literally no problem with that. I'm just worried that while we're all looking for the 100% solution and passing on the 90%, Tyrone, Jose, and Mohammed are making themselves an even bigger majority.
The risk then, is that if you gamble badly, the state will ensure the mother can make them Antifa, or hand them to Mohammed etc. Blindly breeding may simply hand your efforts to your enimies, this is also something i think must be added to the risk. Mothers who have tasted the guardianship of the state also incure added risk as they may find the taste addicting when hardshops arise. This should all be part of every individual assessment. If your life, seed and resulting children are of such value as to consider them a privilage, or as i do, a responsibility beyond all calling, then i see it as my duty to consider the risk.
Id retort that a 10% spread in your reply seems very generous, but thats where our opinions must differ. If there is risk in any relationship, then there is no 100%.
While i may disagree a bit on the details, i do think we are coming from a common desire to see all our children free of evil and giving a fertile ground to grow in. Much love, pede.
So there is no risk? I said its a big risk. I didnt say impossible.
So is there no risk?
There's risk in any relationship, what the fuck are you talking about?
Talking about past history being an indicator of future possibility.
Although i guess thats just foolish, cause instead i should assume that after x amount of years they must be a better person.
If there is risk, and your good with it, then great for you. I take my own risk assesment seriously. And believe it to be a risky bet. My opinion. Dont like, don't care.
Good say, sir.
Literally no problem with that. I'm just worried that while we're all looking for the 100% solution and passing on the 90%, Tyrone, Jose, and Mohammed are making themselves an even bigger majority.
The risk then, is that if you gamble badly, the state will ensure the mother can make them Antifa, or hand them to Mohammed etc. Blindly breeding may simply hand your efforts to your enimies, this is also something i think must be added to the risk. Mothers who have tasted the guardianship of the state also incure added risk as they may find the taste addicting when hardshops arise. This should all be part of every individual assessment. If your life, seed and resulting children are of such value as to consider them a privilage, or as i do, a responsibility beyond all calling, then i see it as my duty to consider the risk.
Id retort that a 10% spread in your reply seems very generous, but thats where our opinions must differ. If there is risk in any relationship, then there is no 100%.
While i may disagree a bit on the details, i do think we are coming from a common desire to see all our children free of evil and giving a fertile ground to grow in. Much love, pede.
Thank you kindly for the conversation.