469 () posted 256 days ago by Incindir 256 days ago by Incindir +469 / -0 4 comments share 4 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (4) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 7 ▼ – slangin_paint 7 points 256 days ago +7 / -0 are you seriously trying to cite a law to trump a royal decree? permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Drew 3 points 256 days ago +3 / -0 They will just amend it. Just don’t wear a mask because you don’t want to and find a store that is cool permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – crash7863 2 points 256 days ago +2 / -0 The republicans recently seemed to rediscovered their balls here in MN. First attempt to get the state to pay for riots was shot down. So, I don't think an amendment would go through. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – RedWhiteBoom 1 point 256 days ago +1 / -0 They'll easily say it falls under the medical treatment clause in the law. permalink save report block reply
are you seriously trying to cite a law to trump a royal decree?
They will just amend it. Just don’t wear a mask because you don’t want to and find a store that is cool
The republicans recently seemed to rediscovered their balls here in MN. First attempt to get the state to pay for riots was shot down. So, I don't think an amendment would go through.
They'll easily say it falls under the medical treatment clause in the law.