I didn't say "stating Kungflu as cause of death for a gunshot victim isn't technically fraudulent". I said 90% of the records weren't fraudulent. Even though there are laws against medical records fraud, those laws would not apply to the majority of cases examined. Those laws would apply to only a few, such as the gunshot victim, if it could be proved that there was intent to defraud the state.
And as I told you when you DM'ed me, I'm not referencing the records that aren't fraudulent. LMAO, so after sending me TEN increasingly weird DM's like a freak and getting shut down, now you come back here for an ELEVENTH response. Dude/lady, you've got some screws loose.
Read Rule 5. Read Rule 8. Rule 1 is still in effect as well. Not that you need my permission but you have it to share the DMs with anyone including mods.
I didn't say "stating Kungflu as cause of death for a gunshot victim isn't technically fraudulent". I said 90% of the records weren't fraudulent. Even though there are laws against medical records fraud, those laws would not apply to the majority of cases examined. Those laws would apply to only a few, such as the gunshot victim, if it could be proved that there was intent to defraud the state.
And as I told you when you DM'ed me, I'm not referencing the records that aren't fraudulent. LMAO, so after sending me TEN increasingly weird DM's like a freak and getting shut down, now you come back here for an ELEVENTH response. Dude/lady, you've got some screws loose.
Read Rule 5. Read Rule 8. Rule 1 is still in effect as well. Not that you need my permission but you have it to share the DMs with anyone including mods.
Fuck you, you pathetic oddball little douche.