1381
Comments (78)
sorted by:
60
AmericanPatriot2020 60 points ago +60 / -0

I also think it offers a pretty compelling reason why I think capital punishment should be extended to sex crimes against children.

30
BetsyFreedom85 [S] 30 points ago +30 / -0

I agree 100%

14
FreeBased1 14 points ago +14 / -0

I agree 9000%, but we get to torture them first. Start with cutting off their balls, then their dick.

Then just go to town and have fun.

6
LoneStarDangler 6 points ago +6 / -0

Relatives to the victim get 1 hour to do what they want with the perp.

3
Jackhererer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same with shooting victims when innocents are murdered by gang bangers.

2
Fourtyandfourtyfive 2 points ago +2 / -0

FreeBased

After removal, cauterize the wound. Old west style, Bowie knife heated in a fire.

Wouldn’t want the sonovabitch bleeding out before I’m finished.

Personally I would keep IV fluids on hand to keep them hydrated and make up for blood loss. Smelling salts to awaken from pass outs. Etc etc.

He’s destroyed that innocent child for life.

I want this to drag out for the same amount of time or at least seem like it for Muhammad...

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
1
BecauseYoudBeInJail 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Got to do something about these missing children grabbed by the perverts. Too many incidents - fast trial, death penalty." - VSGEOTUS, 10/8/2012

48
BetsyFreedom85 [S] 48 points ago +48 / -0

This was his second offense of rape in Sweden, a country that stupidly gave him citizenship in 2014

https://freewestmedia.com/2020/07/23/somali-rapist-a-repeat-offender-sentenced-for-rape-of-9-year-old-swedish-girl/

23
svartchimpans 23 points ago +23 / -0

Oh so he was sentenced to just a little over 1 year for his previous rape of a 12 year old. Then he got out and raped a 9 year old. And he doesn't speak Swedish. Yet they won't deport him "because Muh he has citizenship". Fuck Sweden's politicians.

8
BeefChucker 8 points ago +8 / -0

Poor children.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
35
ForwardObserver 35 points ago +36 / -1

No you are wrong. Even if Somalians were the nicest,most polite and unselfish people in the world we dont need them coming in with a foreign culture and mindset. We do not need an excuse to protect OUR culture and people and our country.

22
BetsyFreedom85 [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

It’s an example of why we should protect our country at all costs, it’s not an excuse.

5
ForwardObserver 5 points ago +11 / -6

and I am saying we dont need to point out the worst of these individuals and say that this is why we dont want them. We dont want any immigrants that are not from the racial stock that built the USA. We descendants of the original pioneer stock that settled this county dont want anyone who is not our kind here. Can you wrap your head around that concept.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
2
BeefChucker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Implemented correctly, immigration is a valuable asset that built most everything you encounter today. Western civilization did not just appear. There is plenty of room in America, we just have to step up emigration.

4
ProfessorRomendev 4 points ago +5 / -1

'racial stock'

ah.

-2
ForwardObserver -2 points ago +2 / -4

Caught that part huh?

27
redpillthenormies 27 points ago +28 / -1

We need ZERO immigration from Somalia.

2
ikbork 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree, Ilhan Omar needs more relatives to fuck

2
jubyeonin 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's how you end up with slightly more inbred Ilhan Omars.

14
Cjsmith87 14 points ago +14 / -0

Where in the fuck were the parents?

10
freefolk 10 points ago +10 / -0

At the BLM protests.

12
Pikes985 12 points ago +13 / -1

No Vikings left in Sweden or he would never have seen trial. In some things the Old Ways were better.

4
deleted 4 points ago +9 / -5
4
LoneStarDangler 4 points ago +4 / -0

Butthurt raid victim spotted.

3
LostViking1985 3 points ago +3 / -0

cope

2
Pedeville 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats simply untrue. We conquered land in England, France, America, Russia etc. We were just too lowpop to keep it

3
Pedeville 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, because Americans always rise up when you're getting fucked by government. Or actually, only American leftists, considering the conservatives are sitting on their ass watching commies destroy all the property their taxes paid for. People with viking spirit dont live in cities where this guy probably spends his time

11
Debutante 11 points ago +14 / -3

This light sentence does not surprise me. Europeans have a very different attitude toward sex. To them, (especially the men) it's no big deal. If they thought European women would let them get away with it -- they'd have let him go altogether. I don't know why European women put up with as much piggy behavior as they do -- but the men call it "progress".

Just look a the English legal system turning a blind eye to all the grooming gangs while thousands of little British girls are repeatedly raped. They claim its because they dont want to seem racist. But its also because European men attach as much importance to sex as they do to a trip to the water closet.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
3
Debutante 3 points ago +3 / -0

Got me. I think European women are brainwashed. The men have their wives and feel entitled to their mistresses. But I suppose it doesn't matter because everybody cheats on everybody else anyway. They've got their topless beaches and whatnot. And they just can't wait to bring their attitudes over here. So when stuff like this happens they shrug their shoulders and say, "they'll (meaning the victims) get over it."

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Debutante 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have to disagree here.

A very long time ago, I met a European young man in college. We had a whirlwind romance that ended abruptly when my American values regarding the necessity of marriage did not mesh with his European attitudes toward sex.

At the time, he walked away from the relationship with the remark that he would return when he felt he'd experienced enough of what the world has to offer. Loosely translated, he meant sampling other women -- but not to worry -- I was given permisson to do as I pleased until his return.

I was properly horrified any young American girl who has grown up reading romance novels would be. This was unlike any plot of any book I'd ever read. My broken heart took years to heal. I finally met a young American man whose values were identical to mine, and we planned our wedding.

As a soon to be bride, I had deposits down on everything and my wedding gown (which I was sewing myself) already in progress --when the phone rang eight months prior to my wedding day.

I was in complete shock to discover the European young man on the other end back, as per what he considered our "agreement". He had sampled enough of what the world had to offer to the tune of 31 (rather like Bressler's ice cream flavors I thought, when he told me this) and now he felt ready to settle down and procreate. I was the lucky lady chosen for the job.

I told him I was getting married to someone else. I never told him that the thought of 31 previous partners revolted me and that if he were literally the last man on earth -- I would choose to die a virgin rather than be with him. And also, that his offer was insulting years ago and even more insulting when I realized he thought i had agreed to it.

So I know more about European men than I care to know, both from him, and others I've come across in my life. They are very immoral when it comes to sex. They are so different that any American girl who takes up with one will probably end up with a broken heart.

As I've often advised young girls -- the charming accents are not worth the trouble of having a man that can't be loyal to you. American men are far more likely to have fidelity in their heart.

It has nothing to do with Marxism. It has to do with a piggish attitude and a genuine belief that wives are for breeding and the rest of the women in the world are there for their personal fun and games.

Furthermore -- please don't tell me (of my experience) "it's just one person" -- I've lived long enough to help glue together the pieces of many girls who fell for the accents. Some don't get out of the relationship until it's too late and suffer though tremendous infidelity for the sake of their children.

Marry AMERICAN.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Debutante 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am older than you. The young European man I spoke of passed away a few months ago of disease related to age -- I shudder to imagine what the grand total of his collected "experience" was by the time he shuffled off this mortal coil.

Things like that change women in unpleasant ways. I remember years of being suspicious of all men until I realized it as the European students and a few of those who would have been considered liberal back then who had to be avoided.

I changed my habits and only dated conservative American men. But even then -- everything becomes confusing when you've had a relationship with someone who placed no value on the purity you were preserving for your future husband. I wondered if love was just a lie and relationships for men were only about sex after all. It wasn't supposed to be that way -- my books had promised me my very own "prince" and happily ever after. I was depressed and disappointed for a very long time.

I never (thank God) became angry and vindictive because of the experience -- just very suspicious of men's motives in relationships. Quite truthfully, my poor husband went through far more than he should have to gain my trust. But in all our years together, I have never doubted his love and loyalty. I got my "prince" after all -- he was just in another castle.

I sometimes wonder if these rabid feminists of today are just a different version of the depressed and disappointed girl I was all those years ago. Is their haterd of and vindictive attitude toward men a result of broken dreams and promises that were the result of some man in search of "experiences"?

I don't know. I'm just glad I'm not young in these times.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Debutante 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's pretty awful, isnt it? Romance is pretty well dead --books and tv promote revolving door affairs. I don' t think they even look at one another as people with feelings. When someone is hurt they're just told told to "move on" as if it should be easy to detach your emotions from one person and transfer them to another at the drop of a hat.

If it makes you feel any better -- some women feel the same. My daughter (who is about the same age as you) often wonders why her friends can move from relationship to relationship without taking time out to assess what went wrong and work on whatever aspects of themselves contributed to the problem.

She doesn't understand how they can claim to be "in love" with a constant parade of men, one after another.

But I'll admit I sort of cheated when parenting her. When she was getting old enough to date I made her watch a film called "Looking for Mr. Goodbar".It's one of those things that can strongly discourage any woman from getting involved in a lifestyle of casual sex. Unfortunately, it's seldom run anymore. If it was -- you wouldn't see women acting the way they do now.

Once my daughter saw it -- she decided being "old -fashioned" was much safer.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Debutante 1 point ago +1 / -0

That article is sort of misleading. The cops interview the victim first but she's usually seen by medical personnel who supply her with the needed psychological support.

With this guy's plan the rapist would never be pursued or brought to justice.

I am still a little hesitant to ascribe it to Marxism. Unless, it could be said that these people don't realize the atitude is coming from Maxism. In my day it was Hugh Hefner's influence and also James Bond movies. I can honestly say I never heard any guy talk about women in regard to Marx. But Hefner and James Bond? You betcha.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Debutante 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would agree with some of that -- but not all.

You can't raise a daughter to be totally dependent on men. What happens if she marries, has three children, and her husband dies without life insurance? Or if she marries a man who beats her, or is a womanizer-- should she remain stuck in the marriage because she can't afford to support herself?

I am against the welfare state. I am also against women feeling pressured to marry as soon as they can, to the best provider they can get, purely for economic reasons. The best way to stop that craziness is to make sure women are well educated and able to care for themselves, if need be.

That doesn't necessarily lead to rabid feminism and leftism. A woman can be 100% a girly girl and still have a STEM career or a head for business.

I was extremely lucky to have hit the marital jackpot. I really only had my looks and a second rate education to fall back on. I didn't come from wealth or social background and learned quickly exactly what I was worth on the marriage market. I often wonder what would have happened to me had I not met my husband because women in my day were raised to be homemakers.

I don't think you can adequately appreciate the anxiety a woman feels when every date is a life and death situation because her future survival depends on getting a husband. That is no way to live.

That was the main reason I made sure my own daughter received the education my parents felt a woman didn't "need". No matter what happens, she will always be able to find a job, and support herself. And the horrible anxiety of worrying about the future isn't a problem for her, as it was for me.

Someday when you have a daughter of your own -- you'll want her to have a say in her own future. You might not think so now -- but you will when the time comes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Debutante 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are very idealistic when it comes to the subject of families aren't you?

Unfortunately, the reality of the situation is that most people are pretty selfish. If you don't believe me, just ask anyone who has relatives in their 80's and 90's. You'll find that the elderly become the sole responsibility of one sibling, while the rest of them go merrily about their business living their lives. They have no time, you see. They are busy. But they will find time to show up when the will is read to see what they were left. And none of them seem to be bothered by the fact that they shoved the total responsibility for elder care off on their brother or sister.

So if you think that the "family" of an unmarried woman would be willing to support her for the rest of her life because she didn't catch a husband -- you are sadly mistaken. I have seen women become resentful when their husband slips a few dollars to their widowed mother. They are not going to let their husband support his sister until the day she dies. It isn't going to happen in the real world. And you're forgetting parents don't live forever.

Insofar as the dual personality of woman at work -- does it matter? Unless you are working side by side in the same environment -- how exactly does it affect you? Unless she brings it home, which, she probably won't if she's in STEM -- it's only a problem if you make it one.

Insofar as business -- well, look at Trump's daughter Ivanka. She's certainly very feminine and from all appearances, content to be a wife and mother in addition to her business role.

Insofar as voting -- you're putting me on now aren't you? That's almost "Archie Bunker" and he was a parody. A lot of women vote for foolish things. A lot of men vote for foolish things too.

I could personally introduce you to this liberal fellow I've known for 45 years who hasn't voted sensibiy in the entire time I've known him. You'd like my voting record better I assure you.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
Kaarous 10 points ago +11 / -1

Less immigration

I disagree. We need negative immigration from Somalia. We need to send them all back, that's what we need.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
thelastlast 6 points ago +6 / -0

why do they all have the same name

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
K-Harbour 5 points ago +5 / -0

.....AND SWEDEN.

4
Usernameicanrecall 4 points ago +4 / -0

The term is Shithole.

4
Staatssicherheit 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, this is why we need strong leaders in all levels and branches of government and the death penalty.

4
Winter_huntress 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dolph lundgren posted about this on his Instagram and the comments were based AF, people are waking up it seems

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
physicscat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Repeat offender.

If you're not born in a country and apply for citizenship, you should lose it if you commit a felony offense. Period.

2
WHYsoMAD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy fuck why isn't this fucker dead?

2
RedFoxOnFire 2 points ago +2 / -0

He looks Swedish to me.

2
TheHolyMonk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuckin' Sweden. Put down the vodka and wake the fuck up. Stop letting the women run and ruin your country. Are there any real men left in Sweden?

2
RabidZoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Twist his head until it pops off.

2
AGuyFromAus 2 points ago +2 / -0

No ... this is why we need firing squads.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Oh_Reddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

castrate then publicly behead them

1
cpjustice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those prisons in Sweden are more like hotels anyways.

1
ThurtineFiddyToo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe China knows what they're doing with those boxcars of muzzy filth. Pretty funny that after commies take control they instantly lose patience with all the subversive societal elements that they rode to power on the backs of. Wonder how quick antifa would pull the rug out beneath trannies here.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
IdahoMan87 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Swedish CONSERVATIVE newspaper Nya Tider published pictures...”

In other words, the MSM covered it up.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dudemanfoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why dads should own guns...

1
1776take2 1 point ago +1 / -0

If she has a real father he won’t walk free again.

1
koshersquid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Am I the only one who reads 11 years in that headline?

1
BetsyFreedom85 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s sentenced to 11 but in the article it states he will only serve 7 years

1
MidwestNorsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolute FILTH.

1
Pedeville 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now he can get out of jail before she's legal and rape her again. Will probably only sit 2 years and get released, its the usual business in Scandinavian countries. InNorway rapists and pedophiles gets as low as 9 months jail time