Some say it would set a dangerous precedent, but I still like the internet blackout idea. Riot starts, when it gets going suddenly cell signal and all internet goes out in that area. Law enforcement comes in, rounds everybody up, confiscates phones and recording devices as evidence. Charges are pressed, and people are locked up without playing into the propaganda. Embed reporters to cover the roundup if you want, but charge ALL the rioters. Lock them up, no bail. They are after all dangerous.
The problem is that it certainly does set a dangerous precedent, one that would immediately be used on Trump supporters following a Democrat victory. Remember your Covid protests? Yeah nah, they'd lock you up.
If you think they're going to wait until we do it first, you're mistaken.
I'm not giving up on the future. I'm protecting the future.
We can do 2 things at once. One, solve the currently problem of riots destroying other people's property
Two, fix the system.
I'm not sure what your argument is here. Would you expand on how I would be giving up the future? I truly believe the other side does not have morals and are bad actors. They will do it to us. It doesn't matter if we do it first.
The only good commie is an ex commie? Well ok, I'll give them a chance to do an about face, but we shouldn't allow very many in any one area when the time comes
Some say it would set a dangerous precedent, but I still like the internet blackout idea. Riot starts, when it gets going suddenly cell signal and all internet goes out in that area. Law enforcement comes in, rounds everybody up, confiscates phones and recording devices as evidence. Charges are pressed, and people are locked up without playing into the propaganda. Embed reporters to cover the roundup if you want, but charge ALL the rioters. Lock them up, no bail. They are after all dangerous.
The problem is that it certainly does set a dangerous precedent, one that would immediately be used on Trump supporters following a Democrat victory. Remember your Covid protests? Yeah nah, they'd lock you up.
I agree with the other guy. The Democrats don't need precedent. They'll do it anyway.
Obama set a dangerous precedent spying on Trump.
Who tf cares about precedent anymore. The communists are not honest players and all tactics need to be explored.
So you're giving up on the future?
Why do liberals need a 2A? Or any other rights for that matter?
Think about the finality of what you're saying.
You're NOT going to stop Marxists by taking down the internet - you need to start with stopping the funding that goes to your schools/colleges etc.
...always these "brave" solutions that affect ordinary people, but none to remove the actual cause of these problems.
If you think they're going to wait until we do it first, you're mistaken.
I'm not giving up on the future. I'm protecting the future.
We can do 2 things at once. One, solve the currently problem of riots destroying other people's property
Two, fix the system.
I'm not sure what your argument is here. Would you expand on how I would be giving up the future? I truly believe the other side does not have morals and are bad actors. They will do it to us. It doesn't matter if we do it first.
The only good commie is a dead commie. Never forget that!
Well, I'd like to see some people become ex-commies first. If that's possible.
The only good commie is an ex commie? Well ok, I'll give them a chance to do an about face, but we shouldn't allow very many in any one area when the time comes