Pedes, I just had a stroke of genius while laying in bed this morning next to my wife and our newborn son.

Memorize the below, then watch the snowflakes MELT.

FALLACY OF THE INVERSE

If P, then Q. Therefore, if not P, then not Q.

Arguments of this form are INVALID.

Example:

If you are a ski instructor, then you have a job.

You are not a ski instructor Therefore, you have no job.

Clearly, you can still have a job without being a ski instructor.

How does this apply to BLM?

If you support BLM, then you care about black people.

You do not support BLM. Therefore, you do not care about black people.

THIS ARGUMENT IS INVALID.

In conclusion, I do not support BLM. But I do support black people.

GET FUCKED, YOU ILLOGICAL SNOWFLAKE CRETINS!

Sincerely, MAGA NERD