16
Comments (26)
sorted by:
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
peixeazul 2 points ago +3 / -1

I’m with you fren, there are much worse things than the modern Mormon. 😂

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
OrangeManOffical 1 point ago +1 / -0

you mean polygyny (multiple wives) not polyandry (multiple husbands) and I haven't seen any proof of pedophilia, the FLDS on the other hand definitely need to be raided again.

1
peixeazul 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weeeeelll, there was definitely some polyandry going on in the early days too. Church founder Joseph Smith sent several men to England on a mission overseas and propositioned their wives who stayed home...”marrying” them while allowing them to co-habitate with the original husband when they returned. So there’s that...

1
OrangeManOffical 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have a source? Here is the most detailed I can find: https://www.fairmormon.org/answers/Polygamy_book/Polyandry I wouldn't really consider non sexual polyandry to be polyandry unlike the polygyny which was blatantly sexual in nature. This is information I was unaware of however and an interesting note on the oddities of early mormon/lds behavior (not that's not odd now just less odd). Also I don't seen any indication there is any connection to people being on missions to England that seems to be entirely inaccurate.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
OrangeManOffical 1 point ago +1 / -0

not source. no argument. just accusations and emotion you sound like a leftist.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OrangeManOffical 1 point ago +1 / -0

block for being a retard.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
OrangeManOffical 1 point ago +1 / -0

Marriage in your mid teens was legal and common practice at the time because of the shorter life spans (Same source you sighted and the one i sighted in my other comment below).

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
OrangeManOffical 1 point ago +1 / -0

no but I believe it was large, I'm not disagree with it being creepy and an abuse of authority but pedophilia it is not. I'll look and see one of the sites has enough detail to figure out the age. I'll edit this comment with it. Never mind based on your other comment (below) you aren't worth talking too. It's pathetic of you to attack me by calling me an apologist, instead of providing counter sources you just claim mine are bad with no proof. I don't argue with people that argue in bad faith believe what you want don't bother to seek the real answer go dwell in your hate like a leftist.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OrangeManOffical 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now your making wild assumptions I'm not moron fuck face. I told you you were to stupid to be worth talking to.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2