The BLM nutjobs on the street is one thing. But the real danger is the politicians who give cover to them like Pelosi and Rand, the executives who brainwash the impressionable like Druckmann and the "sportsball" players like Watson. But you don't attack these people head on. You will never change thier minds. But those who support them, the cowards like Richard Petty, are able to be dissuaded.
Rand is an ideologue like Shapiro. Very eloquent in presenting their positions but sometimes very foolish looking when reality hits them in the ideological balls. This is why my support is behind Pragmatists. They care more about the goal (America Greatness) rather than the means (Conservatives! Libertarians!)
Exactly. I like Rand, and like that he never compromises on his core ideology. Unfortunately, his core ideology is not going to win the war against Leftism, Globalism and Islam.
Rand is principled to a fault, which is why he has never had my full support. I do admire his unwavering commitment to libertarian principles, but I wouldn't want to live under the repercussions.
Rand's fatal mistake in this saga is that he refuses to acknowledge that the constitution is only as good as the extent to which it is exercised by the people.
You may protest, but if you're protesting to take someone else's rights away, your protest is 100% irrelevant.
You may exercise your 2A right, but if you're doing it to overthrow the government in the hopes to establish a more tyrannical government you've illegitimatemized your own cause.
The constitution is was written in a "spirit" and it's that "spirit" which we seek to protect and extend into the future for our children.
The enumeration of the rights contained therein is merely a flawed attempt to materialize the spirit of liberty and justice we seek to pursue.
Yep. Rand bought into the fake news that "federal agents were rounding up people at will." It was two people and the District Court just BTFO the suit the Oregon AG brought forth. Federal agents rounding up rioters who are setting fires is somehow controversial to Rand.
Rand thinks that there is no place for federal agents in protecting federal courthouses. I'm not sure what underlying Rand Principle he is trying to adhere to. Big government always bad, "protestors" always good?
I'm still trying to get the Rand boys to explain this one to me.
exactly this. all these terrorists and rioters are pawns. if you want the queen, go after nancy pelosi. want the king? go after george soros. and if you want the chessmaster himself, you're looking at China.
The BLM nutjobs on the street is one thing. But the real danger is the politicians who give cover to them like Pelosi and Rand, the executives who brainwash the impressionable like Druckmann and the "sportsball" players like Watson. But you don't attack these people head on. You will never change thier minds. But those who support them, the cowards like Richard Petty, are able to be dissuaded.
Rand is an ideologue like Shapiro. Very eloquent in presenting their positions but sometimes very foolish looking when reality hits them in the ideological balls. This is why my support is behind Pragmatists. They care more about the goal (America Greatness) rather than the means (Conservatives! Libertarians!)
Well said and agreed. Dogmatism has it limits.
Exactly. I like Rand, and like that he never compromises on his core ideology. Unfortunately, his core ideology is not going to win the war against Leftism, Globalism and Islam.
Rand is principled to a fault, which is why he has never had my full support. I do admire his unwavering commitment to libertarian principles, but I wouldn't want to live under the repercussions.
Rand's fatal mistake in this saga is that he refuses to acknowledge that the constitution is only as good as the extent to which it is exercised by the people.
You may protest, but if you're protesting to take someone else's rights away, your protest is 100% irrelevant.
You may exercise your 2A right, but if you're doing it to overthrow the government in the hopes to establish a more tyrannical government you've illegitimatemized your own cause.
The constitution is was written in a "spirit" and it's that "spirit" which we seek to protect and extend into the future for our children.
The enumeration of the rights contained therein is merely a flawed attempt to materialize the spirit of liberty and justice we seek to pursue.
When principle meets reality without common sense you are doomed.
Some things are worth dying for. Not all by a Longshot.
Rands principles leave him optionless. He could never run our nation.
I like Rand and would support him for president, buy maybe that's being too sentimental.
Politicians like Rand is why we keep losing. They conserve nothing.
Yep. Rand bought into the fake news that "federal agents were rounding up people at will." It was two people and the District Court just BTFO the suit the Oregon AG brought forth. Federal agents rounding up rioters who are setting fires is somehow controversial to Rand.
Rand thinks that there is no place for federal agents in protecting federal courthouses. I'm not sure what underlying Rand Principle he is trying to adhere to. Big government always bad, "protestors" always good?
I'm still trying to get the Rand boys to explain this one to me.
Mfw thedonald.win knows the real news better than politicians.
Sometimes. Sometimes we just aren't cucked.
and all major league sports
you left out the "mainstream" media
exactly this. all these terrorists and rioters are pawns. if you want the queen, go after nancy pelosi. want the king? go after george soros. and if you want the chessmaster himself, you're looking at China.
the corruption runs deep