And it was long enough that he fired his 5 shots slowly, there was a pause, and the guy in the car can be heard returning fire. It's pretty clear that if the person had their pistol out and were threatening people, he sure as heck wouldn't have gotten off 5 shots and then a pause before return fire.
Indicates that as the driver was hearing the shots go off, they took cover and reached for their pistol wherever they kept it in the car. In any case, it's pretty clear that there was no justification for Garrett shooting first. Even when they tried to say the driver was threatening people with his car, the driver was actually surrounded and stopped. Meaning there was no justification there either for firing the AK first.
I know that they will try to burn the driver, but there's just too much evidence in the scenario that says Garrett had no cause to fire first. Even if it was just bad trigger discipline and he accidentally fired the AK, the driver would still be justified.
I think the most likely scenario is Garrett was power tripping from walking around open carrying. He felt like Mr. Badass with his open carry and black girlfriend next to him in a wheelchair. Him pushing her, showed the others that he was on their side, and I bet he got a lot of circle jerking from others for it, which stroked his ego to an extreme degree. A white man in a BLM "protest", pushing a legless armless black woman, while open carrying?! That's like the holy leftist/communist/SJW trifecta of ego tripping, virtue signaling, and circle jerking. The guy was probably soo high off of it, he might as well have been on cocaine.
He thought he was all that was right and good, which warped his brain, so when he approached the driver threatening them, something happened to where Garrett shot first. People there say they "think" it's because the driver pointed a gun at his quadriplegic girlfriend (if you have to say "you think" when you were there, you weren't a witness), which is an absolutely ridiculous claim that clearly deserves scrutiny, because why the hell would a driver point a gun at a woman in a wheelchair with no arms and legs, with a guy standing next to her with an AK? Sounds wholesale made up.
It's actually pretty clear from just the timing of the shots alone, that the driver did not have a gun in their hand when the AK shots were fired, otherwise it wouldn't have taken soo long for them to return fire, and they would have most likely started shooting first as he was raising the gun up, so that's clearly not what happened.
no doubt - they are trying to describe this as some shoot-out when the data clearly was the result of a retaliation event. otherwise we'd likely hear overlapping shots even.
All i know for sure is this makes me very happy after watching days and days of rioting looting and attacking police. I want to see more of this. Also, who the fuck is gonna wipe his wife's ass now? I'm laughing at her too, I see the reason she is in a wheel chair, karma bitch.
You can hear someone yell "everybody back up!" Just before the shots go off... I was wondering if that was him "taking charge" and letting everyone know he was going to shoot out the tires.
And it was long enough that he fired his 5 shots slowly, there was a pause, and the guy in the car can be heard returning fire. It's pretty clear that if the person had their pistol out and were threatening people, he sure as heck wouldn't have gotten off 5 shots and then a pause before return fire.
Indicates that as the driver was hearing the shots go off, they took cover and reached for their pistol wherever they kept it in the car. In any case, it's pretty clear that there was no justification for Garrett shooting first. Even when they tried to say the driver was threatening people with his car, the driver was actually surrounded and stopped. Meaning there was no justification there either for firing the AK first.
I know that they will try to burn the driver, but there's just too much evidence in the scenario that says Garrett had no cause to fire first. Even if it was just bad trigger discipline and he accidentally fired the AK, the driver would still be justified.
I think the most likely scenario is Garrett was power tripping from walking around open carrying. He felt like Mr. Badass with his open carry and black girlfriend next to him in a wheelchair. Him pushing her, showed the others that he was on their side, and I bet he got a lot of circle jerking from others for it, which stroked his ego to an extreme degree. A white man in a BLM "protest", pushing a legless armless black woman, while open carrying?! That's like the holy leftist/communist/SJW trifecta of ego tripping, virtue signaling, and circle jerking. The guy was probably soo high off of it, he might as well have been on cocaine.
He thought he was all that was right and good, which warped his brain, so when he approached the driver threatening them, something happened to where Garrett shot first. People there say they "think" it's because the driver pointed a gun at his quadriplegic girlfriend (if you have to say "you think" when you were there, you weren't a witness), which is an absolutely ridiculous claim that clearly deserves scrutiny, because why the hell would a driver point a gun at a woman in a wheelchair with no arms and legs, with a guy standing next to her with an AK? Sounds wholesale made up.
It's actually pretty clear from just the timing of the shots alone, that the driver did not have a gun in their hand when the AK shots were fired, otherwise it wouldn't have taken soo long for them to return fire, and they would have most likely started shooting first as he was raising the gun up, so that's clearly not what happened.
no doubt - they are trying to describe this as some shoot-out when the data clearly was the result of a retaliation event. otherwise we'd likely hear overlapping shots even.
Well the guy in the car may have saved many lives. It could have turned into a mass shooting event
Every witness who lied to the police should be sued by the driver.
Put these basement-dwellers and their enabling parents into the poorhouse.
The latest video going around cuts off after the first five shots are fired so you are left to believe that the shooting ended after that.
They never learn; they shoot their traps off and look like idiots after the truth comes out.
All i know for sure is this makes me very happy after watching days and days of rioting looting and attacking police. I want to see more of this. Also, who the fuck is gonna wipe his wife's ass now? I'm laughing at her too, I see the reason she is in a wheel chair, karma bitch.
You can hear someone yell "everybody back up!" Just before the shots go off... I was wondering if that was him "taking charge" and letting everyone know he was going to shoot out the tires.
Nah, Even if this wasn't Texas, I couldn't see the driver being convicted of anything for this.