The way they did UBI was shit. They had in mind that everyone can have social benefits and eat their cake too. There is no incentive.
My idea of UBI would remove funding from schools, social securities, welfare, medicare, etc. All those government agencies which handle that crap would be gone and would overall save the country money. Not to mention since there is a lot of redundancy in government, giving it to the people would be more efficient. Now that everyone is entitled to this money, you can either spend it on your own welfare, or you can use it to buy food or a place to stay. You have to choose which benefits you think are more important, and then spend it accordingly.
Now you say, "how come I can't get all the benefits?"
You can, you just get a job. lol.
It's probably a bad approach and I would need to see what other problems it would come across against, but it would separate the stupid people from the smart people on how they would invest their UBI. But hey, only the strong/smart would survive, and the stupid who haven't invested in their own health probably won't make it.
Go try it in a county in wyoming or something, once you've destroyed the productivity of the community, hopefully you'll wake up.
The idiots (you) who go all in on UBI have absolutely no standing to completely redo our system with something that has only failed each and every time they've tried it on a small scale.
get rid of the other social programs for this one...won't stop people from quitting their jobs to live for free... Companies will lose employee
These "neets" never would have never contribute to society in the first place. At least this way the funds that were meant to education, medicare, and other social safety nets would not be given to them since they are using their UBI for just food and housing. If they happen to get a life threatening disease, it's not the government's fault that they die from it. I'm talking about people who are obese and all they do is sit around in their house all day eating. Education should be allocated to those who are productive, not to those who would sit in their house all day.
same thing happened in canada
No it hasn't lol. Those people got a social safety net. With the UBI I proposed, they have to choose paid education, medicare, etc, or a place to sleep and some food. In canada, they had it all.
These neets are a drain on society, and a drain on tax payer dollars. This will remove them from the tax payer's dollars since everyone gets UBI, unlike how it is now where the rich and middle class pays for these neets to sit around.
The way they did UBI was shit. They had in mind that everyone can have social benefits and eat their cake too. There is no incentive.
My idea of UBI would remove funding from schools, social securities, welfare, medicare, etc. All those government agencies which handle that crap would be gone and would overall save the country money. Not to mention since there is a lot of redundancy in government, giving it to the people would be more efficient. Now that everyone is entitled to this money, you can either spend it on your own welfare, or you can use it to buy food or a place to stay. You have to choose which benefits you think are more important, and then spend it accordingly.
Now you say, "how come I can't get all the benefits?"
You can, you just get a job. lol.
It's probably a bad approach and I would need to see what other problems it would come across against, but it would separate the stupid people from the smart people on how they would invest their UBI. But hey, only the strong/smart would survive, and the stupid who haven't invested in their own health probably won't make it.
Go try it in a county in wyoming or something, once you've destroyed the productivity of the community, hopefully you'll wake up.
The idiots (you) who go all in on UBI have absolutely no standing to completely redo our system with something that has only failed each and every time they've tried it on a small scale.
Go back to reddit fag
Basically this method would remove those that aren't productive out of the community.
Touchy touchy. They hated my idea there as well since there is no social security net for the worthless.
These "neets" never would have never contribute to society in the first place. At least this way the funds that were meant to education, medicare, and other social safety nets would not be given to them since they are using their UBI for just food and housing. If they happen to get a life threatening disease, it's not the government's fault that they die from it. I'm talking about people who are obese and all they do is sit around in their house all day eating. Education should be allocated to those who are productive, not to those who would sit in their house all day.
No it hasn't lol. Those people got a social safety net. With the UBI I proposed, they have to choose paid education, medicare, etc, or a place to sleep and some food. In canada, they had it all.
These neets are a drain on society, and a drain on tax payer dollars. This will remove them from the tax payer's dollars since everyone gets UBI, unlike how it is now where the rich and middle class pays for these neets to sit around.