3515
Comments (358)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
purple_nitrile 0 points ago +1 / -1

you've destroyed the productivity of the community

Basically this method would remove those that aren't productive out of the community.

Go back to reddit fag

Touchy touchy. They hated my idea there as well since there is no social security net for the worthless.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
purple_nitrile 1 point ago +1 / -0

get rid of the other social programs for this one...won't stop people from quitting their jobs to live for free... Companies will lose employee

These "neets" never would have never contribute to society in the first place. At least this way the funds that were meant to education, medicare, and other social safety nets would not be given to them since they are using their UBI for just food and housing. If they happen to get a life threatening disease, it's not the government's fault that they die from it. I'm talking about people who are obese and all they do is sit around in their house all day eating. Education should be allocated to those who are productive, not to those who would sit in their house all day.

same thing happened in canada

No it hasn't lol. Those people got a social safety net. With the UBI I proposed, they have to choose paid education, medicare, etc, or a place to sleep and some food. In canada, they had it all.

These neets are a drain on society, and a drain on tax payer dollars. This will remove them from the tax payer's dollars since everyone gets UBI, unlike how it is now where the rich and middle class pays for these neets to sit around.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
purple_nitrile 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you want to get rid of social programs, people need jobs first.

LOL. Lemme guess, you're on social welfare cheques, and my tax paying dollars are going to people like you? I never needed social welfare, and people who I live with would rather die than take social welfare.

StillVotingTrump

As am I. He is the only one that is actually reducing the redundancy of government jobs, and was the reason why I voted for him.