2452
Comments (209)
sorted by:
155
Baryonic 155 points ago +158 / -3

That's an AK47 variant. I am really sick and tired of people that know nothing at all about guns even talking about guns

61
YaBoiJacob 61 points ago +62 / -1

AKM right

59
Nadlers_Belt 59 points ago +59 / -0

This exact model.

PSAK-47 GF3 FORGED NUTMEG WOOD TRIANGLE SIDE FOLDING RIFLE WITH CHEESE GRATER UPPER HANDGUARD https://palmettostatearmory.com/psak-47-gf3-forged-nutmeg-wood-triangle-side-folding-rifle-with-cheese-grater-upper-handguard.html

72
NNEPUSMC 72 points ago +72 / -0

The first question on the ad: “ Can I use this in Austin, TX?” Hahahaha

29
deleted 29 points ago +30 / -1
17
rootGoose 17 points ago +17 / -0

Not to be outdone:

Best Answer: only 5 rounds in austin...

12
20KAG20 12 points ago +13 / -1

Decent AK47 if you want American Made. Can’t hate him on the choice of gun.

That being said, the best AKs are Russian. If you go AK, go authentic.

8
AFandAM 8 points ago +8 / -0

Mr Kalashnikov himself said Bulgarian are best.

2
556x45mm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bulgarian Sam-7R for the win

2
AFandAM 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sam-7 carbine :)

7
FergieJR 7 points ago +7 / -0

What about cheap knock off Yugoslavian?

I mean it works and it cost about $300 hah

7
Farage_massage 7 points ago +7 / -0

$300 is considerably more than it costs to get a “real” AK in most of the world. What’s the main differences?

11
KyleRules 11 points ago +11 / -0

Importation bans, embargoes, Bill Clinton.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because in the real world, that AK is beat to whit because it belonged to a Somali warlord's foot soldier and was never cleaned, and before that it belonged to an Afghan goatherder, and before that it....

2
20KAG20 2 points ago +3 / -1

I’d love to see a $300 AK again. They are all $600 starting now.

1
SpaceForceMilitia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mil surp isnt as prevelant as it used to be, and terrorist cells will pay more.

The US market cant take over, or makes poor versions, because a well made US AK cant cost 300 and be well made. Cast bolts are one of the work arounds. No thanks.

Part kits dont even come with barrels anymore. Making an older source of bargin price complete AKs not worth it. The source for cheap isnt stable. Gotta wait for some old Warsaw spots to empty some more warehouses.

1
Nonredneck4 1 point ago +1 / -0

in the mid eighties in brooklyn, $125 got you a type 56 chinese (AK47) in the case with grease. not legally of course

3
Lockdown106 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was just a cheese maker. Had to cash in my cheese grater to afford my weapon to bash the dash.

2
RolandDelacroix 2 points ago +2 / -0

PSA Gen3 AKs still shit, get this to AK Operators Union 4774 ASAP.

1
spezisapedo 1 point ago +1 / -0

damn OOS

29
Gulleyfoyleismyname 29 points ago +29 / -0

Bless you my Pede for knowing the difference between AKM and AK47.

5
NotProgCensored 5 points ago +5 / -0

Slanted cut muzzle.

2
AFandAM 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nope. There are zero semiautomatic AK-47s. The AKM variant is a revision to the 1947 model. The slant muzzle brake is designed to fight either rifle's tendency to rise to the left (iirc, might be right) when fired.

Somewhere there is a brief guide on the differences, but I don't recall slant brake being one of them.

1
spezisapedo 1 point ago +1 / -0

but for all practical purposes if you you're talking about an actual ak47 you will say, a full auto ak47. If someone says ak47 in general, it is almost always assumed to be the semi-auto ak variant.

1
AFandAM 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think this is a magazine/ clip thing. There is a right answer, but nobody cares. The AK world is a fascinating thing to learn about if you are so inclined.

12
Dialectic 12 points ago +12 / -0

Thought I was the only pedantic one. It’s an ak sporting rifle if we want to be dicks about it. ;)

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
BoughtByBloomberg2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Birth defect? If you tell me she's one of those transabled nutjobs this table is getting flipped.

1
commies0ride0free 1 point ago +2 / -1

No she got sick with an “unknown illness” and had sepsis/lack of blood flow to her limbs. Pretty shitty. If I was in her position and he was my main source of help I would tell him everyday “DO SHOOT AT PEOPLE IN TEXAS”

2
BoughtByBloomberg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't you mean DON'T?

2
commies0ride0free 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lmao yes but now I’m leaving it

1
FragrantDude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unknown illness, where did you read that? Everything I've read said UTI from toxic shock syndrome.

1
commies0ride0free 1 point ago +1 / -0

USA Today, I could’ve sworn it said unknown, now it just says “medical condition that led to sepsis”

4
BunnyPicnic 4 points ago +4 / -0

IT'S AN ASSAULT RIFLE. REEEEEEE

4
MaxineWaters4Prez 4 points ago +4 / -0

But it has fully semi automatic bump stocks with silencer and white supremacy.

92
whiskey_shitz 92 points ago +92 / -0

Open carry is fine. Pointing your weapon is not.

Glad the Austin police understand this.

It's ironic that these BLM folks expect the police to side with them isnt it?

17
jaubrey 17 points ago +17 / -0

Don't be so judgemental. That giant gut of his prevented him from pointing it at the ground.

4
20KAG20 4 points ago +5 / -1

Haha niccccce. You got me laughing.

2
grndmrshlgando 2 points ago +2 / -0

get shot dead get made fun of for being fat after so much well deserved pwnage

2
jaubrey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Covid claims yet another victim 😢

2
spicy_deluxe 2 points ago +2 / -0

On the West Coast the police side with BLM even when they're throwing explosives and pointing lasers at the police so it's no surprise they expect to get away with everything.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

BUT HES GOT MUH GREAT TRIGGER DISCIPLINE!

70
mastayoda420 70 points ago +71 / -1

He didn't get shot for having a gun he was shot for USING his gun.

9
20KAG20 9 points ago +12 / -3

Has it been confirmed he fired the weapon?

12
JonahND 12 points ago +13 / -1

yes

6
Farage_massage 6 points ago +8 / -2

Source? Trying to wade through all the “he was pushing his disabled wife!!!!1!” Articles...

9
rootGoose 9 points ago +9 / -0

That primary twitter video. The timeline is roughly as follows:

Crowd walks past car. Car honks. Crowd turns back onto the car. 5 Large caliber rapports are heard. The camera person runs for cover. 3 (maybe 4) Smaller caliber rapports are heard.

Here's the video: https://twitter.com/Spid3rNS/status/1287222916661346310?s=20

5
Magus_Strife 5 points ago +5 / -0

The replies to that video are some examples of real and serious ignorance and stupidity. You can HEAR the difference in the first set of shots and the second set, but the narrative is "This is Trump's America. The man just innocently approached a vehicle and was shot 3 times."

Even if you know nothing about firearms, you can fucking count. 8 =/= 3

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Ballind 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't have it on my clipboard for you but there's a pic of the muzzle flash if the clear audio and witnesses aren't enough.

3
Farage_massage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reason I ask is because I can find no video of muzzle flash and Austin PD, who have since released the driver said he shot first per the drivers account and that the second shots were another protestor.

1
Ballind 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have the police statement? Last I saw was that local news said the police said that, however that's arguably less credible than our speculation here.

A cropped picture is linked below, couldn't find the source I saw this morning. Lot going on with the light so it's possible it wasn't him but the first shots in the audio going around were from a rifle and I believe the police did state that the driver only had a handgun.

https://www.usasupre.me/releaseddriver.html

3
spezisapedo 3 points ago +3 / -0

That has NOT been confirmed.

3
dldeuce 3 points ago +3 / -0

Having it while committing a crime is the same as using it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Five times

53
fazzman23 53 points ago +53 / -0
6
undepressor 6 points ago +6 / -0

That gif is infectious.

4
Mrwrn2010 4 points ago +4 / -0

One of the few gifs that genuinely makes me smirk/laugh every time I see it.

5
christianknight 5 points ago +5 / -0

They always support using your freedoms against you. Just like libtards were pro freedom of speech when the church ladies were trying to get rock music and Doom banned.

46
Harambe2k 46 points ago +46 / -0

Ain’t no need for that high capacity clip that can shoot like ten thousands magazines a second.

17
Pilotmtb 17 points ago +17 / -0

It’s ten thousands ‘clips’ a second.

43
Nadlers_Belt 43 points ago +43 / -0

Now we know how she lost her limbs.

27
jaubrey 27 points ago +27 / -0

Well at least she wasn't armed.

3
DarkBerry 3 points ago +3 / -0

This post is SAVAGE.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
36
solarsavior 36 points ago +37 / -1

As a libertarian, I am offended. This is all on the left.

15
FreedomCrayon 15 points ago +16 / -1

Right? The libertarian ideology is being infiltrated by a bunch of leftists and communists trying to bastardize it. Not sure if they call themselves that just because they don't want to be called leftists/democrats or if this is a deliberate attempt to take over.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
7
spezisapedo 7 points ago +7 / -0

yup. Open borders infringes on your right to property. Any actual libertarian would get that. Most libertarians today are just leftists pretending to be anarchists.

1
FreedomCrayon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Fair enough. Though it seems to have very much ramped up in the last three years (or maybe I'm just noticing it more).

And yeah, I don't know how they figured open borders is even remotely a good idea. That not only infringes on job and property availability (not to mention general safety) for Americans, but would also make Americans pay for that shit--like now but even worse. They lost me on that one. Shit, I want walls on the southern AND northern borders.

I guess I'm just a weird one (by their standards these days anyway), because I view myself as a Constitutional libertarian. America first, adhere to what the founding fathers intended, and stay the hell out of my home.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
FreedomCrayon 3 points ago +3 / -0

What the actual fuck....

5
rootGoose 5 points ago +5 / -0

The first two Libertarians I knew have since gone completely Socialist.

They had both moved out to Commifornia and, I'm guessing, they got the drugs that were driving their Libertarian motivations.

4
FreedomCrayon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, that's what I'm noticing a lot of. They call themselves libertarian, but they're actually socialists. I don't know how they found their way to the ideology that was supposed to promote small government and strong personal responsibility/liberties when they actually want to have authoritarian rule over everyone else to include thought-policing.

It's a tough place politically these days when the demorats and leftists are actively seeking to destroy our country, most GOP reps seem to be more than happy to let it happen, and the LP seems to be getting more cucked by the day (hell no to open borders). I really hope a lot of these RINOs and uniparty assholes get the boot during these upcoming elections.

0
MelonLabia 0 points ago +3 / -3

A question for libertarians:

If a 12 year old wants to enter into a contractual relationship with a 40 year old to provide sex is that ok?

7
solarsavior 7 points ago +8 / -1

12 year old not old enough to enter a contract.

Libertarian isn't the same as anarchy. It means limited government, not no government.

0
MelonLabia 0 points ago +2 / -2

Can a 12 year old get a part time job mowing lawns, or delivering papers?

4
solarsavior 4 points ago +5 / -1

I've answered your question.

1
MelonLabia 1 point ago +2 / -1

So no? How old does one need to be to exchange goods for services?

4
TrumpTrain_MAGA2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes but they cannot be contractually obligated to do so. Nor can they legally enter any contracts without an adult representative.

4
spezisapedo 4 points ago +4 / -0

no. 12 year old cant consent to that. If they want to just a part time job or mow lawns that is fine given they follow the youth labor guidelines. Working does not carry the lifetime trauma that underage sex can.

-1
MelonLabia -1 points ago +2 / -3

I agree, but why are they allowed to exchange some services for payment, but not others.

Hard drugs can cause serious lifelong trauma. Should we regulate those?

Letting anyone who isn't a criminal into the US (per current libertarian party policy) can very traumatic to natives wages and quality of life. Should we limit open borders?

2
spezisapedo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why are you trying to justify adults diddling children? .... And yes, hard drugs that cause serious lifelong trauma are regulated. Even some that dont.

And yes - open borders is the most retarded thing. BUILD THE WALL.

30
AngelMark 30 points ago +30 / -0

Why is his disabled wife at a riot? She cant be too bright!

27
Skogin 27 points ago +27 / -0

He brought her there, she didn’t have a choice.

4
undefined 4 points ago +4 / -0

feels on wheels

12
Chickenbaconpoutine 12 points ago +12 / -0

Gotta score them woke points!

5
rootGoose 5 points ago +5 / -0

She's not just disabled, she's also...

black

9
incogneato 9 points ago +9 / -0

something something human shield something pity points something

5
CousinEddie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Found an awesome news link on pol earlier, i didn’t save the link so I’ll paraphrase the good stuff.

  1. He just bought that gun recently citing it was to protect protestors.
  2. his half retarded and fully disabled wife wanted to go, bc she wanted to “do more”.
  3. they go together, he gets shot and dies.
  4. according to her mom, the spud is basically inconsolable now and speaks just a few words before breaking down completely.
  5. the dead guys mom says he would never point a gun at someone

It’s like a real life Always Sunny episode, it’s just so insanely stupid from every angle. Really great read, hopefully someone else has it

2
TrumpTrain_MAGA2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

The dead guy's mom is wrong. Dead wrong. Her kid wrong.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

The dead guy's mom always says her boy was such a good boy etc. Anybody here happy that their mom doesn't know most of the stupid shit you did in your life?

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
8
jive-ass-turkey 8 points ago +10 / -2

Yep, didn't think shooting a car's tires would be considered deadly force I guess. Watched too many movies.

4
dldeuce 4 points ago +4 / -0

It might very well be called aggravated kidnapping in Texas, and like he found out, you can get shot for that.

7
thekindlyman555 7 points ago +7 / -0

Current story being told by the police is that the first 5 shots were from the driver and the second set were from another protester firing at the car as it fled. They've apparently recovered 3 guns from the scenes, because both shooters apparently turned themselves in.

5
MuadDon 5 points ago +6 / -1

Two rounds, 3 different weapons. The rifle rounds he shot at the car, the response fire from the driver's handgun, and then another protester shot at the car as it fled.

The second round of shots was fired by protesters who witnessed the shooting, Manley said. The shooter fired at the car while it drove away. That person was also taken into custody but later released, Manley said.

9
thekindlyman555 9 points ago +9 / -0

According to the police recounting of events, and as told by the driver, he fired first and Garrett didn't fire, merely pointed the gun at the driver.

That's the most recent information.

We'll have to wait and see if we get the driver to speak out publicly, or if they release information on whether Garrett's gun was discharged, and what the caliber of the driver's gun was.

7
commies0ride0free 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah, if you point a gun at me you might as well be firing at me- I will shoot you

6
thekindlyman555 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not disagreeing with you, just trying to put the most up to date information out there.

3
commies0ride0free 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh sorry, also not disagreeing with you! Guess just qualifying that shots or not driver was justified- wasn’t reading that they weren’t from your comment, just adding to it

7
thekindlyman555 7 points ago +7 / -0

What is this civility? I haven't experienced civility online since at least 2012.... xD

3
20KAG20 3 points ago +4 / -1

Is this confirmed?

2
TakeTheOil 2 points ago +2 / -0

No he did not. The Austin police said the victim didn't fire his weapon.

20
tonightm07 20 points ago +20 / -0

He blew out the tires of the car without much thought and continued to point his weapon at the car window.

It was far game on his ass as the car driver had to defend himself. He was unlawful and the car driver was lawful in discharging of their firearms. Nothing to do with either of them carrying said weapons.

Sadly he gave an interview (before he died) and it was clear he and his commie mates were doing these for days. As in stopping traffic whenever they felt like it. And so he is dead because he thought he was a hardman (in front of his commie fellow commie scum) and thought he was the law.

These people are very dangerous to themselves and others around them. In my mind an utter failure of law enforcement.

9
jive-ass-turkey 9 points ago +9 / -0

Didn't even need to point it at the driver.

Once lead is hitting your only means of escape, let it fly.

8
dldeuce 8 points ago +8 / -0

Didn't even need to fire it. At a minimum it's unlawful restraint. By threatening deadly force, it becomes abduction which becomes kidnapping and by merely exhibiting a deadly weapon, it becomes aggravated kidnapping. Like the guy found out, you can get shot for that.

19
togger 19 points ago +19 / -0

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

18
StJustinMartyr 18 points ago +18 / -0

Pretty sure that’s an AK Operators Union, Local 47-74 hat. I don’t think Rob Ski would appreciate him repping it to a BLM riot.

13
Dialectic 13 points ago +13 / -0

Everyone gets to use the 2A, even dipshit commies. Just the way it is

17
ParticleCannon 17 points ago +17 / -0

2020, the year where "dumbass shaming" is "problematic"

14
GeauxTrump20 14 points ago +14 / -0

It’s a good thing that such a stupid liberal left-wing idiot got killed so that he could not in fact kill any of his comrades or innocent people

11
LaughlinPrepper 11 points ago +11 / -0

Is the wife a quadriplegic ?

22
ChickNorris 22 points ago +22 / -0

I read somewhere that she's missing hands and feet but she's not paralyzed so not quadriplegic. A quadruple amputee? I'm trying to figure out what could have lead to this condition.

18
Trump2024 18 points ago +18 / -0

trying to figure out what could have lead to this condition

Having a husband that has no situational awareness? He doesn't have a clue that he's pointing the owie side of his weapon directly at his wife. Looks to me like he's had negligent discharge issues at least 4 times around her in the past.

14
jive-ass-turkey 14 points ago +14 / -0

She had complications from a urinary tract infection that eventually resulted in sepsis, killing her limbs which resulted in amputation.

Forget where I read that but it sounded definitive at the time.

6
Trump2024 6 points ago +8 / -2

Ah, so a heroin addict. That makes sense.

2
Magamom2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

His pupils are dilated to the max in his interview moments before his death

1
Trump2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you wanna ride

ride the white horse

If you wanna ride

Don't ride the white pony

2
Magamom2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cocaine?

2
commies0ride0free 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read the same, Except they called the initial infection an “unknown illness”

16
Southern_Belle 16 points ago +16 / -0

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2011/04/01/quadruple-amputee-teen-from-garland-focuses-on-new-life/

Septic shock and they don't know how she got the infection, according to the article.

13
ChickNorris 13 points ago +13 / -0

That is incredibly sad.

14
undepressor 14 points ago +14 / -0

She suffered a systemic bacterial infection and had her limbs amputated as a life saving measure.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
9
ChickNorris 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just read the article. It is really incredibly sad.

7
residue69 7 points ago +7 / -0

Another post this morning said sepsis from lack of blood flow.

Edit: Strike that, reverse it.

7
MaxineWaters4Prez 7 points ago +7 / -0

You've got that backwards. Sepsis causes the blood vessels to dilate (get larger), causing a drop in blood pressure. We put people on IV drip medications to restore blood pressure but it works by constricting all of your vessels.

Long term, high dose and your capillaries and small veins slam shut, causing loss of circulation to the furthest, smallest parts of your body.

Fingers, toes, ears, male genitals...

3
residue69 3 points ago +3 / -0

What if the male has a front hole Dr. Smartypants!? /s

7
mastayoda420 7 points ago +8 / -1

Quad amputee, no hands no feet.

7
TrumpLovesPussy 7 points ago +7 / -0

some people act like they deserve a prize for not keeping their finger on the trigger, it's common sense.

7
deleted 7 points ago +11 / -4
6
incogneato 6 points ago +6 / -0

and to live off of her disability payments like deadguy was undoubtedly doing

7
Kanime1224 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not to mention he was ready to use it without a proper defense reason to do so. Unlike the person in car who defended themselves.

7
Kolob 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe in gun control and he has no control at all. Never point at anything you don't intend to obliterate. I will be spending more time at the range for more control. Also they should be used for self defense, not for attacking random people. This guy is an idiot

7
IlxTheGreat 7 points ago +7 / -0

Call me an idiot, but, I think this joker realized this woman is going to be dead from the disease that's killing her (a microorganism that caused the blood flow to her limbs to shut down.) They had to amputate her limbs last month, she lives in Plano (by the Medical Center,) her mother and this guy were taking her back and forth, till last week, the Amputee decided to participate in the protests AMA, her mother's, and her fiance's will. I think he wanted to be killed. Could be wrong, but that would be my 2 cents.

8
incogneato 8 points ago +8 / -0

five bucks says he had himself named as her caretaker and was living off her disability payments and his caretaker payments

that's why he's had plenty of free time to terrorize the community like this

6
residue69 6 points ago +6 / -0

I was thinking the same. Now he's a martyr with a six figure gofraudme.

13
bill_in_texas 13 points ago +13 / -0

The driver who was forced to shoot this asshole should sue to try and get that Gofundme cash. I'd say, with the trauma he endured, he's earned it.

6
MAGA_4EVER 6 points ago +6 / -0

Since when do leftists believe in open carry? All of them were crying when Beto lost.

Also, people who take their responsibility of gun ownership seriously don't just point it at other people unless they are in danger.

Because if you point it at someone, they are in danger and will react accordingly.

And who tf takes a disabled woman out to a riot anyway?

This dude was retarded and mislead and he paid for it with his life.

5
Dialectic 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tiny head mafia

5
KAG4Life2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fiance, they aren't married of course....

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
5
spez69 5 points ago +5 / -0

I guess his fiancée should invest in a self-propelled powered wheelchair at this point.

5
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 5 points ago +5 / -0

All I see is a former communist larper, now reformed.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
NotProgCensored 3 points ago +3 / -0

He has a nice and quiet safe space though, forever.

5
Skankblunt42 5 points ago +5 / -0

How about when he was on camera he couldn't formulate a coherent answer as to why he was open carrying, putting on full display for everyone that he was LARPing.

4
PurestEvil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, calling for the support of Libertarians is a long shot WHEN YOU ARE ACTUAL FUCKING COMMUNISTS TRYING TO TAKE THE REST OF OUR LIBERTIES. How about you go fuck yourselves you Marxist trash?

And leftists are the opposite of Libertarians, even some Libertarians are spineless cucks licking your boot for not getting called Nazis, which makes them a mix of traitors and actually-not-Libertarians-but-rather-Liberals.

4
ScottyGunn 4 points ago +4 / -0

"What I see is a radical terrorist with such shit discipline that he's pointing a rifle at his disabled <s>wife</s> widow."

4
panic_scam 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everything’s an AR to a lefty.

“This AR says Glock on the side of it!” “This AR says Whirlpool!”

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
xBigCoffinHunter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don’t care that he had carried his gun. Care that he pointed it at the driver of a car for no reason.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
KripterKidd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Open carry in Texas still requires a LTC (license to carry) not sure if this dumbfuck had LTC, my money is on him not.

3
BoughtByBloomberg2 3 points ago +3 / -0

When the anime avatars are the voice of reason... society is lost!

2
HumbleMemeFarmer 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Hands Up, Don’t Shoot”

Not you.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Seruna_Kanus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like how the barrel is almost aimed at her leg.

1
CnnWillBlackmailYou [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If she had a leg, it would've been.

2
jcd_007 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Victim blaming”? Bullshit. From what I’ve seen it appears he pointed a rifle at someone who was legally armed and he suffered the consequences. He’s not a victim.

2
bbq1 2 points ago +2 / -0

***disabled widow

2
Destineed369 2 points ago +2 / -0

How come last week is the literal first time ive ever heard libertarians associated with leftists?

I used to vote libertarian. Never will again.

0
CnnWillBlackmailYou [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're TRYING to use their label game to pretend there's more people on their side than there are. Nothing more.

2
Destineed369 2 points ago +2 / -0

So instead of pandering to the middle they try and include like the 5th smallest politcal group in the states ? fucking lol

0
CnnWillBlackmailYou [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why would that surprise you? It's literally what Chick-Fil-A, Gillette, NASCAR, NFL, MLB, Dick's Sporting Goods, Camping World, Starbucks, EA, Dove, PayPal, Nike, Burger King, Coca Cola, Covergirl, Ben & Jerry's, Marvel, Netflix, Disney, Apple, YouTube, Facebook, Google, UPS, Chipotle, Delta, Oreo, USAA, PlayStation, etc. etc. etc. have all done.

People are stupid.

2
Destineed369 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which is why they go broke. These small fringe groups theyre pandering to cannot replace the lost revenue when people like you and I stop doing business with them for involving politics where it doesnt belong.

2
Adhal 2 points ago +2 / -0

And they still don't understand the difference between using a gun for protection and using a gun to threaten.

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now you know why she's missing an arm.

2
Reddinatored 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doughy terrorist fuckwad

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
grndmrshlgando 2 points ago +2 / -0

what happened to him is what all these communists deserve. imagine spending all that money on that weapon, acting like a tough guy, shooting and missing a parked car 10 feet in front of you then getting killed and meme'd on. and I don't feel that bad for the quadrapelegic fiance because she is also BLM

2
LightLurker 2 points ago +2 / -0

My question is who pushed her home??

1
CnnWillBlackmailYou [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Savage.

2
getkek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Narrative went from care taker to “husband and wife” very quickly!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
utfanx2 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are no victims in this story. A terrorist was shot dead, and an armed driver refused to be a victim.