196
Comments (8)
sorted by:
0
YUUUUGETURDS 0 points ago +1 / -1

350 patients could have survived without it. Don't shoot, just the advocate of the asshole. Please shoot my comment down with some science.

6
Moebius [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Show me the 'science' of officially listing someone as dying FROM COVID with a gunshot wound to the head...or from a motorcycle accident...or Parkinson's Disease...

0
YUUUUGETURDS 0 points ago +1 / -1

I was only playing advocate for a real argument. That is not the case you pose here.

1
Moebius [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

'Advocate' eh? You were trolling...

1
YUUUUGETURDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I'm not.

5
GlutenFreeFaceDiaper 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's the normal response that skeptics and science should have. "Show me the records, and your data"

Instead these retards go full censorship. Again.

They're not interested in debate, or in facts. They want fear porn and profits.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
spuger 2 points ago +2 / -0

idk if her patients were inpatient or outpatient.

for outpatient, the death rate (at its peak) was about 2%, so she should have had about 7 patients die. Note that the death rate right now is near 0%.

For inpatient, the death rate got a lot higher - you don't get admitted if you're not really sick. Like 17%, which would have been 59 or 60.