“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man. Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
There's no chance that criminal activity of a president will result in criminal charges against them after leaving office if such activity cannot proceed against them while IN office actively committing the crime.
As for Biden, there's no way that degenerated old man will make it through a trial even if the case is airtight. He's already approaching the threshold of at least claiming incapacity to give testimony.
It's the right decision to focus resources on those people who's cases may actually proceed and conclude with conviction.
By definition we are not supposed to be aware of certain high level actions. They can’t both be prosecuting high level people and telling everyone about it until the time is appropriate. Otherwise they would lose. There are many many many evil people.
I"ll answer that question Bill since the Dem cucks were silent: No, it is not ok to burn federal buildings. It was never okay. Not now, not tomorrow , not fuckin ever.
Other than DC should be a Capitol city rather than a district and that states should allow only a federal embassy in each state, we should consider how the servants have been serving the citizens. If the government has been overthrown, then no I disagree. Sadly, the states are only coming together to try to force a democratic overthrow of the Electoral College.
Islamic “peaceful”.
Is "Islamic peaceful" anything like "California smart" or "liberal hot"!
Plus they're doing it for black people! So it's racist to try and stop them.
Its not really ‘burn’ burn down the courthouse. You misinterpreted my words.
“As for President Obama and Vice President Biden, whatever their level of involvement based on what I know, I don’t expect Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man. Our concern of potential criminality is focused on others.”
Durham is ONE guy...words matter friend.
Just because it’s not in HIS scope, does not mean one of the other thousands Barr is in charge of isn’t doing anything.
sigh well, yes, but that's not what we're seeing is it?
I'm done hoping against hope. You guys are not going to see justice through your computer screens.
Normalcy bias is bankrupt. (Why? Nothing about this is normal.) The election will mean everything. We won't see perp walks, we're going to see war.
No, we will see civil war two years after they steal the election
There's no chance that criminal activity of a president will result in criminal charges against them after leaving office if such activity cannot proceed against them while IN office actively committing the crime.
As for Biden, there's no way that degenerated old man will make it through a trial even if the case is airtight. He's already approaching the threshold of at least claiming incapacity to give testimony.
It's the right decision to focus resources on those people who's cases may actually proceed and conclude with conviction.
Doomers will be doomers, but the rest of the people wouldn't be so sour if they actually watched more of Barr's interviews and speeches.
I think what he says is great. I just don’t like past actions nor (my perception of) his nonactions. I hope he proves me wrong.
By definition we are not supposed to be aware of certain high level actions. They can’t both be prosecuting high level people and telling everyone about it until the time is appropriate. Otherwise they would lose. There are many many many evil people.
I don’t trust him much, but I did enjoy him slapping some peepees today.
You could hear it in his voice when he asks if it's okay the second time.
Absolutely. Barry seems to be slow walking the indictments but his delivery is a huge tell.
That big beautiful courthouse. You know he wanted to say that. Ha, Trump is rubbing off of on him.
"a lot of people say so, trust me"
Preaching straight facts. When is it acceptable to burn down federal property? That's what every lib supporting the Portland riots needs to answer.
"F#ck them all to death" South Park
Relevant
At this point Sessions would be asleep zzzzzz
I"ll answer that question Bill since the Dem cucks were silent: No, it is not ok to burn federal buildings. It was never okay. Not now, not tomorrow , not fuckin ever.
Thank you AG Barr! Destroying Federal property is not okay! These violent protests are not a myth either Nadler!
He made the Democrats look like fools.
"We're not out looking for trouble." "We are defending the courthouse."
Why aren't we returning live fire?
They are bombs of love!!
The summer of love
Other than DC should be a Capitol city rather than a district and that states should allow only a federal embassy in each state, we should consider how the servants have been serving the citizens. If the government has been overthrown, then no I disagree. Sadly, the states are only coming together to try to force a democratic overthrow of the Electoral College.