It involves reclassifying every single Social media company as a PUBLIC UNITY
I think that's not true.
What they're looking at is the safe harbor provisions under the Communications Decency Act (section 230) which defines a platform versus a publisher. It's been a point of contention for a while.
Leftist lawyers say you can't do anything about it. Most people suggest that reclassifying Twitter et al as publishers (rather than platforms) means they're suddenly responsible for all the illegal content on their platform, in addition to many other ills.
I don't think there'd be much value attempting to classify Twitter et al as public utilities. It makes FAR more legal sense to strip their section 230 provisions.
I think that's not true.
What they're looking at is the safe harbor provisions under the Communications Decency Act (section 230) which defines a platform versus a publisher. It's been a point of contention for a while.
Leftist lawyers say you can't do anything about it. Most people suggest that reclassifying Twitter et al as publishers (rather than platforms) means they're suddenly responsible for all the illegal content on their platform, in addition to many other ills.
I don't think there'd be much value attempting to classify Twitter et al as public utilities. It makes FAR more legal sense to strip their section 230 provisions.