4179
Comments (239)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
HuggableBear 15 points ago +15 / -0

Don't accept results from states with mail-in voting. Feds can litigate easily, especially if it's announced early. They can pre-emptively file injunctions against state secretaries of state preventing them from doing it and take it to SCOTUS. I know, Roberts would fuck us, but that's not the goal.

The goal is to give it enough time for mountains of evidence to pile up of the fraud and disenfranchisement and force a second election, one where Trump was proven 100% correct.

6
Songofsixpence 6 points ago +6 / -0

I like this as a plan B.

3
TheRarestPepes 3 points ago +5 / -2

What is your plan for when that "mountain of fraud and disenfranchisement" doesn't appear?

This community was so fucking sure the Democrats stole the 2018 elections, and look how literally nothing happened. Trump seemed OK with accepting the results. He even claimed 2018 was a "victory" because GOP kept the Senate "and that's all that really matters."

Maybe you're just fucking wrong?

2
I_Keep_Forgetting 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think he has the potential to be right, on paper, but sadly it seems many Republicans have limp dicks when push comes to shove.

1
IPMang 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is interesting... Maybe that's why they're beating so hard on the "Trump won't accept the results of the election" drum...

They know they're going to fuck with the elections so hard that there's no chance it won't be challenged in the SCOTUS, and they're setting the stage for that