REQUEST: Can we please get an AMA from President Trump on this site?
⚠️ HIGH ENERGY⚠️
I know his campaign people lurk here. Somebody please spread the word to the President!
Comments (84)
sorted by:
I know his campaign people lurk here. Somebody please spread the word to the President!
AS LONG AS WE ALLOW Qanon Qultists ON THIS SITE, NO TRUMP WILL AMA HERE!
1st question: "Mr. President, thank you for joining us here. Who is Q and do you know anyone personally who uses adrenochrome?"
Political suicide. We need to create a Qanon.win so they can mingle with themselves.
Dude i follow some of these fuckers on instagram for the lulz and i honestly think its a psyop to make trump supporters look insane. The dude "educating_liberals" on instagram i think it is posted a series of like 9 seperate photos expressing that he believes in flat earth. I was like oh fuckkk dude come on man you got like 500,000+ followers.
Whats scary is these fuckers are so obsessed, if Q posted to vote for Biden tomorrow, they woulf say "Trust the process"...
you're. it wrong
I dunno if this site has the functionality, but reddit used to have a mode for threads where mods could manually approve any questions that got posted, before they showed up.
So they could screen a lot of that crap. It'd be a hell of a lot of work, given the sheer amount of traffic on this site, but it's an option.
That or just have a thread the day before of people posting questions and the mods can just choose which ones to put in the AMA, and lock the AMA so only mods and President Trump can post.
Exactly. There are a lot of ways around the problem, and screening questions has the added benefit of keeping out any leftards who want to try to hop on here and troll.
all the q shit has to be real.,. there's an overewhelming amount of evidence.
Are you being sarcastic?
No. I’ve spent many hours going through q posts and the side by side pictures. There’s no fucking way it’s fake. The Twitter things alone prove it
I don't know about Q stuff, but these are some things I've heard about Q:
Only q can be q because there's way to to verify it's the same poster because of the tripcode. Only Q can use this tripcode. it's pretty impossible to use someone elses tripcode.
http://www.thefullwiki.org/Tripcode
The tripcode appears to be based on 56bit DES which should not be considered secure today. I would say this would discourage casual users from posting as Q, but it is certainly not impossible to use someone else's tripcode.
I'll assume you are correct though and all Q posts with the given tripcode are from the same source.
Q posts on https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/10109671.html#10110219 that he is an effing admin of. Not https://boards.4chan.org/pol/
But yes, it is just DES. IMHO, would be nice if he used GPG on elliptic curves. LOL. But that would require rewriting the imageboard code? But maybe not)) Also all his messages here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g/edit#gid=1596710080
trust sessions
I feel it was a real dude who used to worked close to the president, but somehow got his account compromised. Who knows, but I love conspiracy theories.
U wot
u/EPic The shills will find any excuse to discredit Q. They just ignore stuff like Eric Trump posting stuff about Q on his instagram and his interview about Q with Jesse Watters, or AF1's call sign being changed to Q0 or all the Q twitter accounts that Trump has retweeted, etc. Let's not forget the stuff Q predicted years in advanced and even down to the minute in some cases.
But the shills gotta push their narrative
Proof it's a religion: anyone who doubts it is a shill.
Doubting and attacking with the intent to divide are two separate things
It's called challenging one's beliefs, and if the evidence is strong enough, you wouldn't require faith. Yet you do.
There's a difference between challenging one's beliefs and flat out being in denial. I never said I personally require faith, I did, however, provide more than ample evidence to prove Q is legit. Was that not enough for you? Cause I have more.
You're looking more and more like the type to divide the America First movement and want to see us Trump supporters fight with each other
I'm sure you see me like that. Here's what I want YOU to see:
For years, livestream youtube pro Trump events have been flooded with cycling names who only post "Who is Q," "WWG1WGA," and a few other varieties. They do not engage. They do not discuss, and the MOMENT I said to the room that they were probably China, they all shut down and had a meeting. They are not doing this to help the President get re-elected. They are doing this to make all Republicans look like they believe this shit.
BECAUSE IT HURTS HIS CHANCES AT BEING RE-ELECTED!
You believe what you want. Be a Bhudist. Be a Christian. Follow Judaism, I don't care. But being a Jehovah's witness for your deep cover astrological chart is where I draw the line. This fucker was debunked with false predictions years ago. And you just dismiss those failed predictions and latch on to the new, unproven ones.
YOU ARE EXACTLY LIKE CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVISTS IN THIS RESPECT.
Some crumbs hit. And you weed them out and throw away the rest.
You are not helping the President or his party by trying to peddle this shit. You are hurting.
Wha?
Oh yeah. That got everyone pretty excited in Qland.
I was there several Reddit handles ago.
Would be smart to lock down immigration for the day of the AMA to prevent mass amounts of brigading.
I have to speak the unfortunate truth here:
The reason Trump and his campaign people (who we do know lurk) can't post or be active on this site is because the moderators and site operators are anonymous. There's no Jack Dorsey or Steve Huffman, for example, as the front man or person who everyone answers to.
Now, there's a total valid reason for this, because if anyone DID become the public face of T_D, that person would be instantly crucified, have their life torn upside down, become the #1 hated man in American Media overnight. That's too much of a burden for any one person to endure.
But unfortunately, without someone who can be held publicly accountable, Trump and others cannot risk things blowing up in their face if something goes wrong.
Even though it had the same people as Moderators when T_D was on Reddit, there was still the entire team of Reddit administrators who could, if necessary, step in and take action in an emergency. There was accountability.
If T_D wants to grow beyond a 4chan-type underground information network, it will eventually have to find someone who is both:
a) trustworthy enough to fully support Trump and not be a RINO or traitor, and
b) be so squeaky clean that there is absolutely no dirt on them whatsoever
We have many wonderful mods but even among themselves there is anonymity and self-protection at work to ensure that someone with bad intentions can't infiltrate and do whatever it takes to ruin their lives.
All we can do is hope that someone who is both a strong enough public supporter already and rich enough to defend themselves with a team of lawyers will offer to "buy" T_D and then become that public face it needs while still giving the existing mods the freedom to run things as they have been.
Maybe we just need to make a member of the Trump family a moderator.
The Expert?
I agree, but at the same time how much risk is there to doing an AMA? Worst case scenario the person answering the questions turns off their computer.
The mods of T_D would never do this but, let's play Devil's Advocate and consider the worst possible scenario:
Trump agrees to do the AMA on an unknown website run by unknown individuals with unknown levels of control. The AMA is advertised, announced, promoted, and everyone is watching.
When the time comes, someone's troll bone goes into overdrive and they decide "for the lulz" to replace the website's banner with an animation of Joe Biden buttfucking Obama, and that's what every international media company sees when they browse over for the AMA.
It wouldn't matter if Trump just turned off his computer at that point. He promoted it, he agreed to it, now he's held responsible for the ensuing scandal and outrage and he looks incompetent for trusting a bunch of unknowns.
Could the same thing happen on any other website? Sure, and there have been some similar embarrassments in the past. But then in that situation the victim goes, "CEO is a respected, long time veteran of the industry, so I thought I could trust them, but obviously was mistaken" or you see someone fired in a very public fashion and they become the scapegoat.
That what Trump and family would need here. They would need someone who has impressive, long-standing credentials that the average person would agree would be someone that you couldn't blame anyone for trusting and taking at face value.
Imo what would happen is the left would come here in droves and start being hardcore racists and antisemites for the cameras and then their allies in the media would make sure the whole world knows overnight that "trump supporters are bigots just like we thought".
I agree totally but you can take steps to reduce that. It happened a lot during the AMA on Reddit but you have the entire mod team online and active and you could also disable posting from new accounts (handshake icon) or restrict posting to accounts with X karma and so forth. So while it would totally happen, I believe we have enough mods that the only things the media would see are -23 voted posts and (deleted).
just hire Sarah Jeong and say she was "well respected" at the failing NYT
Also more conservative personalities and leaders. When they tweet out "I am doing an AMA on thedonald.win" we get a lot more exposure
Gaetz
There's a good chance of it happening as we approach the election, his last AMA here was in July (2016) though.
yeah and there'd be the mother of all DoS attacks. Better test your AMA functionality out first. Although if it did happen durring an AMA I think the NSA could basically find and helicopter the offenders
We're having one here at 7pm E, lets see how it goes
The NSA would probably be involved in the attack. I don't trust any of the alphabet agencies.
The ddossing and the site's likely inability to handle the amount of traffic he'd bring in are likely the biggest problems.
Just do a day long post for questions, then someone(mods, highest rank/not retarded, Jon miller/trump jr) pick the questions and POTUS does a video response.
Then its him, Its not ridiculous, and shill spamming wont matter.
As much fun as it would be to shoot the shit with our GEOTUS, I think an AMA here would be kind of pointless and would certainly be a waste of time for him.
I don't see it being beneficial to Trump or his campaign at all and I don't see him unveiling anything we don't already know.
If you have a question for President Trump, you need look no further than his public discourse. Unlike other politicians, he's open and transparent about everything.
you're right, but it would still be awesome to see Trump on thedonald.win
Bad look for him - first minute of his AMA some asshole shill will post something about Jews and fake news will say he agrees with Nazis. Rather have him and his people continue to lurk.
Fuck the haters in this thread. The mad man would do it. He is gonna pop his head in one day. Kicking back with Barron's laptop, eating his morning Big Mac. Logs in to .win and starts flooding the site with shit posts, the craziest shit. He will start off posting a video screaming into the mic "I'm Q bitch!" and thats just to get you wet. When he informs us where he gets his energy, you know that the underground coffee that the government has been mining. It is time the American people know covfefe is real. You'll see...haters. ;)
I don't really see the point of it aside from the coolness factor. Maybe after he wins re-election he can do something like that for his hardcore supporters. It would be kind of cool but ultimately pointless at the moment.
if he actually did an AMA here this site would be attacked with the full force of the china owned cult of lib ddos machine
While I largely support, my main points of concern (as I see them) are:
Infrastructure capabilities: once it would be announced (if and when), the site would receive a massive amount of traffic, as well as DDoS (and other, more nefarious) attacks. The DNC can't even set up a proper live stream most of the time. If something similar were to happen here, the fiasco would be heard throughout the media and the pundits to no end.
Pre-screening capabilities: I assume a lot of questions would be from genuine members, but a lot of new users would also ask questions, and maybe try to sabotage the AMA.
Overall perception: at these unique times of riots and "plague," doing an AMA might be bad optics (or spun into being bad optics).
Scrolling thedonald.win posts that day:
I AM President Trump, AMA!
The CNN bomber did nothing wrong
While Kushner is sleeping please.
His
Honestly, the man has so much to do.... I say we don't pursue this
What a great idea!