I think you mean the DA. The headline is false - the state AG has requested the courts dismiss the case. He's been on the McCloskeys' side the whole time. He cannot drop charges, because his office didn't file them. The corrupt DA did.
You and all your 'reading' and 'comprehension.' Psshaw.
The Missouri AG will be riding a bear into the courthouse, carrying an AR, playing Ride of the Valkyries, to light the charging documents on fire and hurl them into the sun.
Those charges require winning a case against the DA.
Because the charges were dropped, no malicious prosecution.
If those MP charges weren't filed or the DA went and fucked with folks who weren't veteran conservative lawyers, then things would be as fucked as Dereck Chauvin right about now.
Because the charges were dropped, no malicious prosecution.
Not necessarily. They had their house raided and their lawful possessions confiscated over this. They probably still have a case on malicious prosecution.
No no, that's something else, probably a constitutional claim breach of 4th Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure.
Malicious Prosecution is generally a tort claim against a prosecuting attorney who does not have probable cause or other reasonable grounds to bring a claim against defendant.
I'd send you a link but it looks like Minnesota Malicious Prosecution is a common law claim rather than statutory, thus looking at any Minnesota attorney's blog will give you the necessary info.
I read what the police did and I think either our side of the media lied to sell a conspiracy theory or the McCloskey's lawyer caught the police red-handed and prevented a farce.
The cops field-stripped the gun to make it operable but when it was presented it was inoperable.
The police didn't or at least did not yet claim that the pistol was operable at the time of the home defense.
I'm very firmly in the belief that the McCloskey'sknow what they're doing thus my speculating from info reported by third-hand sources (hearsay) seems moot.
Thank you!!! Finally Someone who knows how to use the word "MOOT!" Not mute. The other winners are then and than getting reversed and the big intellectual favorite "irregardless"
Thank you
Headline is false. The State AG cannot drop charges because his office is not the one who filed charges. The county prosecutor did. He is seeking dismissal of the case, ie, asking the court to dismiss it.
The mayor of St.Louis and Kim Gardner D.A. for St. Louis, brought charges against a local couple last month who were caught on video brandishing weapons on the porch of their mansion. She is the one who needs to be charged with at least tampering with evidence and removed from office. The Missouri AG and governor have defended the McCloskey's rights from the beginning!
At this point it's actually better to bring to trial, but if the judge hearing the case is worth a damn they're going to dismiss it at the first hearing as the statute specifically says that using a weapon in accordance with MO 563.031 is not brandishing. After the case is dismissed by a judge that's enough to file the tort claim.
How about using an unlicensed Private Investigator to go after a sitting Governor of the opposite political party. Because that's what she did to Eric Greitens and is already under criminal investigation for doing.
I had forgotten about the tampering of evidence. Yeah, they should nail her for that. I mean throw the book at her. I doubt anyone with an ounce of respect would nail her.
The damage is already done. The second they confiscated the guns it was done. The entire reason they did this was to stop people from defending themselves. These people were rich as hell and as lawyers knew the law in and out. The message was to your average Joe who now understands if he sticks up for himself he'll be taking on the whole world. And he's going to hesitate. No matter how brave he's going to pause and realize "they're going to ruin my life. It would be so much easier to just go hide in the basement and pray they don't find me." And in that hesitation the left already got what it wanted.
Luckily, no one was injured, and the guns that the McCloskey’s legally owned did the trick by keeping the protesters from causing them harm.
"Luckily the protesters, who certainly were fucking around, were spared "finding out" by a homeowner that was fully justified in shooting every single one of them under Missouri law."
"Editor note: A previous version of this story suggested all charges were dropped against the couple. That is not yet formally the case. The Missouri AG is still seeking to dismiss the case. We’ll be sure to keep you updated on this breaking story as new details become available."
Law Enforcement Today Editor’s Note: A previous version of this story suggested all charges were dropped against the couple. That is not yet formally the case. The Missouri AG is still seeking to dismiss the case. We’ll be sure to keep you updated on this breaking story as new details become available.
They should press charges against the AG now.
I think you mean the DA. The headline is false - the state AG has requested the courts dismiss the case. He's been on the McCloskeys' side the whole time. He cannot drop charges, because his office didn't file them. The corrupt DA did.
Ah right right, I get my acronyms confused.
AG AKA Antifa Grandstander
You and all your 'reading' and 'comprehension.' Psshaw.
The Missouri AG will be riding a bear into the courthouse, carrying an AR, playing Ride of the Valkyries, to light the charging documents on fire and hurl them into the sun.
Well, you know, that's what I'd do.
Any room on that bear for one more?
Bring your own bear. One bear can only eat so many leftists before getting sick. Think of the bears, man! Think of the bears!
My own bear!? Jesus Hoppin' Christ man. I can't even get bear arms where I live! (CA)
Hmm... we need a GoFundMe or something to ensure every pede has an appropriate mount for fighting commies.
The March of bears and memes...... One can dream.... One can dream
Things get too much worse with riots and shit and I might up armor my 67 Mustang like a Mad Max fever dream.
Hell, we should all get a bear. We have a right to bear armies!
So, no change from last week.
They already filed malicious prosecution charges.
Those charges require winning a case against the DA.
Because the charges were dropped, no malicious prosecution.
If those MP charges weren't filed or the DA went and fucked with folks who weren't veteran conservative lawyers, then things would be as fucked as Dereck Chauvin right about now.
Aggressive defense lawyering won the day.
Not necessarily. They had their house raided and their lawful possessions confiscated over this. They probably still have a case on malicious prosecution.
No no, that's something else, probably a constitutional claim breach of 4th Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure.
Malicious Prosecution is generally a tort claim against a prosecuting attorney who does not have probable cause or other reasonable grounds to bring a claim against defendant.
I'd send you a link but it looks like Minnesota Malicious Prosecution is a common law claim rather than statutory, thus looking at any Minnesota attorney's blog will give you the necessary info.
What does MN law have to do with MO law?
I'm sorry, I got the states mixed up
It's in the Midwest, starts with an M....same fucking thing lol
What about planting evidence by tampering with the handgun to frame an innocent person?
I read what the police did and I think either our side of the media lied to sell a conspiracy theory or the McCloskey's lawyer caught the police red-handed and prevented a farce.
The cops field-stripped the gun to make it operable but when it was presented it was inoperable.
The police didn't or at least did not yet claim that the pistol was operable at the time of the home defense.
I'm very firmly in the belief that the McCloskey'sknow what they're doing thus my speculating from info reported by third-hand sources (hearsay) seems moot.
Thank you!!! Finally Someone who knows how to use the word "MOOT!" Not mute. The other winners are then and than getting reversed and the big intellectual favorite "irregardless" Thank you
And shitbag criminals being referred to as "gentlemen"...
Absolutely—charge her both for filing clearly bogus charges and her lying about being on the Soros gravy plane.
Headline is false. The State AG cannot drop charges because his office is not the one who filed charges. The county prosecutor did. He is seeking dismissal of the case, ie, asking the court to dismiss it.
The mayor of St.Louis and Kim Gardner D.A. for St. Louis, brought charges against a local couple last month who were caught on video brandishing weapons on the porch of their mansion. She is the one who needs to be charged with at least tampering with evidence and removed from office. The Missouri AG and governor have defended the McCloskey's rights from the beginning!
At this point it's actually better to bring to trial, but if the judge hearing the case is worth a damn they're going to dismiss it at the first hearing as the statute specifically says that using a weapon in accordance with MO 563.031 is not brandishing. After the case is dismissed by a judge that's enough to file the tort claim.
A government official tampering with evidence(her pistol) would be where i would start to get her dismissed from office.
How about using an unlicensed Private Investigator to go after a sitting Governor of the opposite political party. Because that's what she did to Eric Greitens and is already under criminal investigation for doing.
And that retired FBI agent is in prison right now
I had forgotten about the tampering of evidence. Yeah, they should nail her for that. I mean throw the book at her. I doubt anyone with an ounce of respect would nail her.
Didn't hear what happened with the pistol other than they tried to take their weapons
https://thefederalist.com/2020/07/23/legal-docs-st-louis-prosecutor-tampered-with-evidence-in-mccloskey-gun-case/
Missouri is not DC. The courts will smack Soros's puppet... If she keeps her job. She faces a tough primary on Tuesday.
I'm sure the media will widely report on this........not.
Everyone slow down. Eric Schmidt is the Missouri Attorney General, AG. Kim Gardner, POC ($oro$ puppet), is Circuit Attorney, CA for St. Louis City.
Kim Gardner, POC is up for a primary challenge next week by Mary Pat Carl. While still a potential Karen, Mary Pat would be an improvement.
The damage is already done. The second they confiscated the guns it was done. The entire reason they did this was to stop people from defending themselves. These people were rich as hell and as lawyers knew the law in and out. The message was to your average Joe who now understands if he sticks up for himself he'll be taking on the whole world. And he's going to hesitate. No matter how brave he's going to pause and realize "they're going to ruin my life. It would be so much easier to just go hide in the basement and pray they don't find me." And in that hesitation the left already got what it wanted.
Judge Sullivan said he is going to reopen the case after Michael Flynn is convicted
They never had a case and then tampered with evidence. This was harassment and they should fine counter-claims, if possible.
What's the penalty for the Soros pawn St Louis DA?
She's already under criminal investigation for her actions against the former Governor.
So many Dems under investigation. So little indictments, so little justice.
She faces a tough primary on Tuesday.
hawaiian judge soon to overturn this
"Luckily the protesters, who certainly were fucking around, were spared "finding out" by a homeowner that was fully justified in shooting every single one of them under Missouri law."
There, fixed that for you.
They better sue the AG. They will win big time.
Why would they sue the AG? He’s trying to get their case dismissed........
I wonder if they know any good lawyers.
You mean the CA, STL Circuit Attorney.
Now Soros knows he need to own not only the DA but the AG too. Standby next time that position comes up for election.
lol guess that Soros money was for nothing. no refunds, bitch
Now drop charges against the Wuestenbergs in Michigan please.
Morons wanted to make political points knowing damn well they didn't have a leg to stand on.
Nelson "Ha Ha!"
Fuck yeah it was inevitable. They didn't break the law
Excellent news! This is a great victory!
Owned!
Based
Big Miiiike, Barry Hussein and Soros must be pissed
Time for a civil suit. The media and the AG ran their names through the mud over nothing.
Fucking right they did. Fuck Kim Gardner.
Soros puppet holdover from Michael "skid mark" Brown days.
"Editor note: A previous version of this story suggested all charges were dropped against the couple. That is not yet formally the case. The Missouri AG is still seeking to dismiss the case. We’ll be sure to keep you updated on this breaking story as new details become available."
And give then back. With upgrades
Might as well delete this post as it is a mistake.