The 1619 project is only one part of a global push to sway opinion and ultimately promote white genocide. Going after white farmers in South Africa was a trial run to test global reaction. With Whites being the global minority holding a large part of global wealth, there are many geographical regions and demographics that would stand to greatly gain from such a scenario.
Stay safe. Stand up for who you are and the things you believe in. Let us pray that people wake up to understand what's been going on before it's too late. The world's elite don't think in terms of office terms. They think in terms of generations and centuries.
To be honest, it's terrifying to me. If it does not happen in our lifetimes, it may happen in our children's.
If we do not re-elect Trump, these people will be given even more power to further their agenda. The 1619 project by the openly racist NY Times has already been adopted as curriculum in multiple schools.
Do you have actual evidence? Because it's funny how some people crow about the presumption of innocence when it's our people, but then are right along side crazy Nancy talking about "the severity of the accusations" when it's a group or person they don't like.
And spez: it's funny how we separate ourselves from people like David Duke so that you and me average white people aren't responsible for his shit or for those like him. And it's funny how most people here give normal black folks a pass for the inner city, and rightfully so on both accounts because individuals are responsible for themselves, not for the actions of other people who look like them.
But somehow we toss this whole thing out when talking about Jews snd condem the entire race because some people with big noses are bad. That's nothing but identity politics and you can cram it up your ass and take it back to the Left where it belongs.
These links seem to be offered as refutation, if this is not the case disregard the following.
I don't understand why you think anything found in either of these sources (and I'd hardly call the second link a source) is relevant.
The first link seems wholly irrelevant to the discussion at hand. The second contains a cartoonist level of bias, and doesn't bring anything new to the table. I've already addressed the issue of Jewish expulsion and nobody, including this link, has provided a counter point.
Moreover, neither of these address the issue of unsubstantiated allegations and the hypocrisy of those who decry Leftist identity politics while pursuing anti Jewish identity politics.
Come on man, don't quibble. Your implication is clear. It's ok to hold your opinion. We aren't the left to cancel people. But have the courage to say so rather than hiding behind wordplay.
Here's the thing about the accusations- they're not in a vacuum. If you have a motivation to smear a group, you're going to make accusations. If certain accusations have worked in the past, or tie into prejudices the peasantry already holds, then you're going to use those same accusations.
Why would a medieval nation need to smear a group? Well, to get out of debt as I've mentioned. But also because of Divine Right. Medieval kings ruled because they were "chosen by God". If crops failed or there was plague, or natural disasters, then this was seen as a sign that the king had lost devine favor. But of the royalty could push the blame onto another group which was seen as satanic, then that resolves the problem. If you dig past the surface, you'll see that most to all of the medieval expulsions correspond with national difficulties.
As for Rome, they were notoriously intolerant of religious intolerance. If you also worshiped the Emperor, you could go on worshiping whoever you wanted. If you refused, as Jews and Christians did, then they went after you. Romans claimed that Christians were cannibals because we "eat the body of Christ and drink His blood". They believed that Christians practiced incest because we call each other brothers and sisters. Is it any surprise that they'd twist Jewish practices too?