He was not a successful communist. But he had many important and useful things to say about race. That we should judge people based on the content of their character is one of those things.
"wasnt a successful Communist" Oh great. Ill start supporting every Communist that wasnt successful. No he didnt. The civil rights movement was a Marxist movement you buffoon
The history books have written the civil rights movement not in a Marxist light, but as a civil rights movement. So, unless the history books have been rewritten the cast of the civil rights movement in a Marxist light since I was last in school, then I still don’t have a problem supporting civil rights. Frankly, neither should you. You do have to admit, the Marxist have very good branding, and it’s hard to argue with the thing that they Claim they want to support. The devil is in the details with them.
When you see an creature in the wild do you judge it by its appearance? of course you do. Then why do you deny it for people? Everyone does it. Ending segregation against the commandment in Genesis 11 when God separated the
races to end the multi racial component from Babylon was not of God, or beneficial to man. Civil rights was a Marxist movement and nothing that was said was beneficial for anyone, more so for white people. Tell me, was America better or worse after the civil rights movement of the Communist revolution of the 60s?
Yea but these groveling rinos love him. he was a good unsuccessful communist. They praise the civil rights movement then move to the whitest areas they can find lol. Just buffoons
"I have a dream, that one day my four young daughters, will be close enough to the "protests" that they too, may share in the new big screen tv's, cases of beer, half gallon bottles of liquor, and reap the bounty of living Democrat."
It won't be soon in California. MLK would be rolling in his grave
MLK was a Communist. Why do you rinos keep supporting and quoting a communist?
He was not a successful communist. But he had many important and useful things to say about race. That we should judge people based on the content of their character is one of those things.
"wasnt a successful Communist" Oh great. Ill start supporting every Communist that wasnt successful. No he didnt. The civil rights movement was a Marxist movement you buffoon
The history books have written the civil rights movement not in a Marxist light, but as a civil rights movement. So, unless the history books have been rewritten the cast of the civil rights movement in a Marxist light since I was last in school, then I still don’t have a problem supporting civil rights. Frankly, neither should you. You do have to admit, the Marxist have very good branding, and it’s hard to argue with the thing that they Claim they want to support. The devil is in the details with them.
When you see an creature in the wild do you judge it by its appearance? of course you do. Then why do you deny it for people? Everyone does it. Ending segregation against the commandment in Genesis 11 when God separated the races to end the multi racial component from Babylon was not of God, or beneficial to man. Civil rights was a Marxist movement and nothing that was said was beneficial for anyone, more so for white people. Tell me, was America better or worse after the civil rights movement of the Communist revolution of the 60s?
Yeah I don't want to see another instance of that filthy adulterous commie being quoted or praised on here tbh.
Yea but these groveling rinos love him. he was a good unsuccessful communist. They praise the civil rights movement then move to the whitest areas they can find lol. Just buffoons
I agree, its disgusting.
"I have a dream, that one day my four young daughters, will be close enough to the "protests" that they too, may share in the new big screen tv's, cases of beer, half gallon bottles of liquor, and reap the bounty of living Democrat."