So wait, they drove 2 hours from Portland to protest in Springfield specifically? Why? Would make sense if they came from Eugene which is next door to Springfield but not Portland itself.
Nowhere in that article does it prove what the headlines say. Yes, blm was in the suburbs causing trouble, and yes they were run out by neighbors in those suburbs, but where is the proof they said they would come back and rape daughters? Did I miss something?
we have been over this many times through the years on TDW with the newspunch thing. What im saying is not some big surprise or me being a faggot... im just sayin.
you don't want to get your shit straight, thats fine with me.
I appreciate your thoughtful response. Too many times I've seen 'snipers' harassing for the 'sauce' with the object of derailing the message. TDW is a mosaic forum from what I've seen. Oftentimes a grain of truth (maybe not obvious in the headline itself) is in the fringe dweller publishers. Again, I appreciate your measured response.
I checked your post history first. youre obviously a good contributor. i figured it was just one of those oversight things. no biggie.here, have an updoot.
Thanks for the updoot :) In the meantime I've emailed the author of that article asking him for references to the "R" word other than in his own voice. No reply as of yet, and frankly I don't expect one.
Here's my bigger concern though - if we now constrain OP's to avoid certain publications en-bloc, and even link some form of 'reputation' to what OP's do and don't post, then are we not risking becoming conservative SJW's in effect? Are we not ourselves engaging in a form of subtle cancel culture, berating people into conformity? By toeing the consensus line, we merely become echo chambers of the party line, and we lull each other into a sense of righteous conformity that detaches us from what goes on. Pretty much what we accuse the left of doing to themselves.
I'd wager 'Tis a slippery slope, we risk to launch ourselves on if we enforce 'norming', which history shows becomes more and more constricted as willingness to conform becomes more widespread.
LOL Wut
Ah, I thought you were saying the suburbs are violent, rape etc.
So wait, they drove 2 hours from Portland to protest in Springfield specifically? Why? Would make sense if they came from Eugene which is next door to Springfield but not Portland itself.
lol. do they think all these record monthly guns sales were by soldiers?
my sides
Nowhere in that article does it prove what the headlines say. Yes, blm was in the suburbs causing trouble, and yes they were run out by neighbors in those suburbs, but where is the proof they said they would come back and rape daughters? Did I miss something?
newspunch doesnt count as a legit source. do you have any other sauce?
This is from the livestreams two days ago, should be a ton of links to direct replays available around here.
I'm not your butler, matey. Go find your own sauce.
you can just say 'no i dont'.
we have been over this many times through the years on TDW with the newspunch thing. What im saying is not some big surprise or me being a faggot... im just sayin.
you don't want to get your shit straight, thats fine with me.
I appreciate your thoughtful response. Too many times I've seen 'snipers' harassing for the 'sauce' with the object of derailing the message. TDW is a mosaic forum from what I've seen. Oftentimes a grain of truth (maybe not obvious in the headline itself) is in the fringe dweller publishers. Again, I appreciate your measured response.
I checked your post history first. youre obviously a good contributor. i figured it was just one of those oversight things. no biggie.here, have an updoot.
Thanks for the updoot :) In the meantime I've emailed the author of that article asking him for references to the "R" word other than in his own voice. No reply as of yet, and frankly I don't expect one.
Here's my bigger concern though - if we now constrain OP's to avoid certain publications en-bloc, and even link some form of 'reputation' to what OP's do and don't post, then are we not risking becoming conservative SJW's in effect? Are we not ourselves engaging in a form of subtle cancel culture, berating people into conformity? By toeing the consensus line, we merely become echo chambers of the party line, and we lull each other into a sense of righteous conformity that detaches us from what goes on. Pretty much what we accuse the left of doing to themselves.
I'd wager 'Tis a slippery slope, we risk to launch ourselves on if we enforce 'norming', which history shows becomes more and more constricted as willingness to conform becomes more widespread.
Just my tuppence worth :) Have an awesome day!
newspunch is known for reporting unverifiable stuff. Its been that way since I got here 4 years ago. Theyre just not reliable. Have a bad rep.
Looks like they’re gonna have to because your sauce has no flavor. 😂