No one with a gun to their head has to accept handing over cash either.
No one isolated with a man saying "you cant leave unless you fuck me" has to fuck a person either.
If we go by your argument, a person who helps a bank robber at threat of gunpoint is actually an accomplice since they were coerced but didn't actually HAVE to help. They just chose the option they liked better out of shit options.
It involves a set of various types of forceful actions that violate the free will of an individual to induce a desired response, for example: a bully demanding lunch money from a student or the student gets beaten. These actions may include extortion, blackmail, torture, threats to induce favors, or even sexual assault. In law, coercion is codified as a duress crime. Such actions are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in a way contrary to their own interests.
You say that but coercion in order to obtain your freedom is no different than coercion for sex to obtain your freedom from the situation.
its actually incredibly similar, but you're a pedant moron.
You're the fucking idiot.
He didn't HAVE to accept the plea. That's the whole point.
No one with a gun to their head has to accept handing over cash either.
No one isolated with a man saying "you cant leave unless you fuck me" has to fuck a person either.
If we go by your argument, a person who helps a bank robber at threat of gunpoint is actually an accomplice since they were coerced but didn't actually HAVE to help. They just chose the option they liked better out of shit options.
You're the fucking idiot, here, you incel clown.
No dumb fuck.
No one coerced this.
Nice try though
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercion
Learn kid.