Depends on how you define female "empowerment." I'm a traditional, non-feminist female who stayed at home and raised two children and supported my husband of over 30 years (still do). I'm totally empowered.
Feminists discount the importance of motherhood and homemaking and what a vital part of a family it really is. My mother was stay st home and raised me and I have many fond memories of my childhood.
You can be the exception all you want, but that isn't stopping the West from being demographically replaced. It's trad-wives like you who provide cover and ballast for the very feminists you claim to oppose. "Please let me have my cake and eat it too."
It doesn't matter that you're a trad-wife with 2 children and a loving husband. The vast majority of women aren't, and that's the problem.
Many countries have tried to bribe women into having children - giving tax exemptions for each child raised, giving them paid maternity leave, giving them government benefits, nothing works.
You know why? Just ask them.
"I'm focused on my career."
"I'm getting educated."
"I'm not ready for that yet."
It's so fucking easy. Take their rights away, they'll submit to men, and they'll raise children. They don't want to fucking work anyway! All of these 30 something women with their "degrees" and "careers" have no families and are fucking miserable! So just DO what must be DONE!
Again. the thing I've noticed is that the more freedoms granted to women without any responsibility or accountabilty expected from them leads to less freedom for everyone else.
They don't seek to replace men, they seek to gain male authority without any of the responsibility. They're children LARPing as independent adults. But make no mistake, without womens' only grants, affirmative action, discrimination lawsuits, and gender quotas, the workforce would be entirely dominated by men. Men are allowing themselves to be displaced for the sake of propping up this egalitarian myth.
One of the biggest red pills is when you realize that society cares more about women's comfort than men's lives.
Hundreds of thousands of men die in wars (many of those are 18 year olds drafted into service), and although we throw a parade a couple of times a year, we keep doing it over and over...
but when the slightest inconveniences are placed on women it becomes a national crisis that society obsesses over until it's "rectified" - even if that solution is grossly
unfair (such as giving female soccer players the same salary and the same recognition as world-class male players, even though the women would get crushed in any high school boys tournament).
If we treated women as being disposable to the same extent that we treat men as disposable, in the 20th Century (up to and including the Vietnam era) 18-year-old girls would have been drafted as breeding partners for the soldiers who were drafted to fight.
The fact that such a thing is utterly inconceivable tells you everything there is to know about how strong female privilege has always been.
With such preferential treatment already in place, feminism never had a leg to stand on. Not even the first wave. But we let it happen, and now we're seeing the consequences.
They were purposely taught to degrade and hate themselves by the media and academia. Women are very impressionable and easily manipulated so the brainwashing worked very well and very quickly.
Your comment matters more than anything in this thread. We can argue voting rights, trad-wives, femininity, etc till we're blue in the face. But I care much more about stopping those that flipped the west on it's head. Everything else will sort itself out...and mostly peacefully too.
A) The brainwashing has been going on for decades, not "quickly." B) Men are out there wearing masks by the millions, also having been manipulated and brainwashed.
When the establishment, media, and majority walk in lockstep on an issue, most people will believe the majority and play along. Agreeing and cooperating with the tribe is a human survival mechanism being exploited by evil people.
Also a reminder, 1/3 of single women aged 18-35 are disgustingly fat, 1/3 are feminists, 1/3 are corporatists. Perhaps 9/10 are total whores. Is it possible to find a traditional woman who hasn’t fucked 30 dudes? You literally have a 1% chance. Good luck.
It doesn't work. I have an uncle who killed himself trying. I mean, the obit said "cancer" but I'm pretty sure that came about from the stress the "fixer-uppers" that he was marrying. Fortunately enough, just two, the "Audrey" that I remember growing up (not her real name because I'm bad with names), and the one he married after Audrey divorced him.
Yeah I hear that a lot. But then you have to worry about a bitch just wanting a green card. Unless you’re Tom Cruise in The Last Samurai, nowhere is safe.
yes, one of the great legends of Red Pill lore is RooshV, who has since found Christ and is one of the rare few who is based and understands the true nature of women and the psychology of women because he was one of the founders of Game Theory and Pick Up Artistry in the early days of the internet, while also being a hard line conservative and strongly, deeply religious because of his newfound faith in recent years.
Well I bring him up because he was talking about "foreign brides are the answer" on his podcast, and he has lived for a time in places like Poland and Ukraine. He says that to an extent it's true, but at the end of the day it is extremely likely to not be, because of a simple perspective. What traditional and old fashioned woman in another country would be happy marrying a foreign man? That would have to be a woman who is happy to uproot herself and displace herself from her culture and her family just to be with someone she has only known for a short time. It is extremely likely that such a woman if she is young is merely rebelling against her father, and would thus make a horrible mate. Or it's a woman who is economically desperate, and would thus make a horrible mate. It works out well if you actually stay in that foreign country but that's an extraordinary investment no matter how you look at it, and could thus end in disaster very easily.
*1930. I really am seeing some fantastic similarities. Another bit of passed on wisdom is how previous empires - you know, globe-spanning hegemonies like Persia, Greece, and Rome - have fallen by departing from traditional families. I think even the Confederate States could be held up as an example because chattel slavery is not a traditional family.
A little reminder, REJECT MODERNITY, EMBRACE TRADITION.
It's the only chance we have at saving our Nation and it's people.
A) High fertility and birth rates
B) Female empowerment
MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. PICK ONE.
Depends on how you define female "empowerment." I'm a traditional, non-feminist female who stayed at home and raised two children and supported my husband of over 30 years (still do). I'm totally empowered.
Feminists discount the importance of motherhood and homemaking and what a vital part of a family it really is. My mother was stay st home and raised me and I have many fond memories of my childhood.
You can be the exception all you want, but that isn't stopping the West from being demographically replaced. It's trad-wives like you who provide cover and ballast for the very feminists you claim to oppose. "Please let me have my cake and eat it too."
It doesn't matter that you're a trad-wife with 2 children and a loving husband. The vast majority of women aren't, and that's the problem.
Many countries have tried to bribe women into having children - giving tax exemptions for each child raised, giving them paid maternity leave, giving them government benefits, nothing works.
You know why? Just ask them.
"I'm focused on my career."
"I'm getting educated."
"I'm not ready for that yet."
It's so fucking easy. Take their rights away, they'll submit to men, and they'll raise children. They don't want to fucking work anyway! All of these 30 something women with their "degrees" and "careers" have no families and are fucking miserable! So just DO what must be DONE!
A
Then you'll have to take womens' rights away. Are you willing to do what must be done?
Again. the thing I've noticed is that the more freedoms granted to women without any responsibility or accountabilty expected from them leads to less freedom for everyone else.
They don't seek to replace men, they seek to gain male authority without any of the responsibility. They're children LARPing as independent adults. But make no mistake, without womens' only grants, affirmative action, discrimination lawsuits, and gender quotas, the workforce would be entirely dominated by men. Men are allowing themselves to be displaced for the sake of propping up this egalitarian myth.
One of the biggest red pills is when you realize that society cares more about women's comfort than men's lives.
Hundreds of thousands of men die in wars (many of those are 18 year olds drafted into service), and although we throw a parade a couple of times a year, we keep doing it over and over... but when the slightest inconveniences are placed on women it becomes a national crisis that society obsesses over until it's "rectified" - even if that solution is grossly unfair (such as giving female soccer players the same salary and the same recognition as world-class male players, even though the women would get crushed in any high school boys tournament). If we treated women as being disposable to the same extent that we treat men as disposable, in the 20th Century (up to and including the Vietnam era) 18-year-old girls would have been drafted as breeding partners for the soldiers who were drafted to fight.
The fact that such a thing is utterly inconceivable tells you everything there is to know about how strong female privilege has always been.
With such preferential treatment already in place, feminism never had a leg to stand on. Not even the first wave. But we let it happen, and now we're seeing the consequences.
niceeee
and then one day for no reason at all
Absolutely! Amen 🙏🏻 There’s nothing like a beautiful FEMININE woman 👩🏻 for me. No shaved heads or even worse “chicks with dicks”. 🤦🏻♂️
No such thing as chicks with dicks, just dudes with tits.
Put the old roll of quarters in the front pocket before they go to the lesbian club lol
No wonder there's a shortage of coins.
These doctors can do a lot with an anethesized patient, a scalpal and some sutures. Fuckin-ing-gross-lol-cringe-smh
Social and moral anesthetization comes first
“””doctors”””
More like paid mutilators for the mentally deranged.
"Doctors" are just pharma dealers or morally bankrupt pyschos willing to cut you up and mutilate you for a dollar.
Those chicks (and betas) in the Left picture, though, are showing some good enthusiasm:
Already all on their knees, .. firm handjob grip ready to go, .. but they're aiming too high.
They'll never catch it in the face with that form. Just like the intricacies of economics, race, and politics -- it'll go right over their heads.
LOL 😆
Like a MF'n G6!
Where the hell do all those people come from?
reddit.
They also come from Tumblr.
Let's not forget TikTok.
Western Europe
Church.
Found my comment. ^^This^^
Eastern Europe
There is some good ones in the sticks and rural areas
They were purposely taught to degrade and hate themselves by the media and academia. Women are very impressionable and easily manipulated so the brainwashing worked very well and very quickly.
Your comment matters more than anything in this thread. We can argue voting rights, trad-wives, femininity, etc till we're blue in the face. But I care much more about stopping those that flipped the west on it's head. Everything else will sort itself out...and mostly peacefully too.
Yep. Conformity mixed with being controlled by emotion.
A) The brainwashing has been going on for decades, not "quickly." B) Men are out there wearing masks by the millions, also having been manipulated and brainwashed.
When the establishment, media, and majority walk in lockstep on an issue, most people will believe the majority and play along. Agreeing and cooperating with the tribe is a human survival mechanism being exploited by evil people.
Thor: Ragnarok is almost explicit about this in the scene where Hella and Skurge first meet.
My nightmares.
Satan.
Also a reminder, 1/3 of single women aged 18-35 are disgustingly fat, 1/3 are feminists, 1/3 are corporatists. Perhaps 9/10 are total whores. Is it possible to find a traditional woman who hasn’t fucked 30 dudes? You literally have a 1% chance. Good luck.
its tough. gotta find the most decent one you can and mold her.
It doesn't work. I have an uncle who killed himself trying. I mean, the obit said "cancer" but I'm pretty sure that came about from the stress the "fixer-uppers" that he was marrying. Fortunately enough, just two, the "Audrey" that I remember growing up (not her real name because I'm bad with names), and the one he married after Audrey divorced him.
ok give up then
that has not been my experience at all regarding wooing a woman in the 1st 15 mins.
everything else you said is spot on though
It's simple. Go to the market and check out the women with baskets stuffed with Goya foods.
You can find them overseas
Yeah I hear that a lot. But then you have to worry about a bitch just wanting a green card. Unless you’re Tom Cruise in The Last Samurai, nowhere is safe.
yes, one of the great legends of Red Pill lore is RooshV, who has since found Christ and is one of the rare few who is based and understands the true nature of women and the psychology of women because he was one of the founders of Game Theory and Pick Up Artistry in the early days of the internet, while also being a hard line conservative and strongly, deeply religious because of his newfound faith in recent years.
Well I bring him up because he was talking about "foreign brides are the answer" on his podcast, and he has lived for a time in places like Poland and Ukraine. He says that to an extent it's true, but at the end of the day it is extremely likely to not be, because of a simple perspective. What traditional and old fashioned woman in another country would be happy marrying a foreign man? That would have to be a woman who is happy to uproot herself and displace herself from her culture and her family just to be with someone she has only known for a short time. It is extremely likely that such a woman if she is young is merely rebelling against her father, and would thus make a horrible mate. Or it's a woman who is economically desperate, and would thus make a horrible mate. It works out well if you actually stay in that foreign country but that's an extraordinary investment no matter how you look at it, and could thus end in disaster very easily.
*1930. I really am seeing some fantastic similarities. Another bit of passed on wisdom is how previous empires - you know, globe-spanning hegemonies like Persia, Greece, and Rome - have fallen by departing from traditional families. I think even the Confederate States could be held up as an example because chattel slavery is not a traditional family.