Depends on how you define female "empowerment." I'm a traditional, non-feminist female who stayed at home and raised two children and supported my husband of over 30 years (still do). I'm totally empowered.
Feminists discount the importance of motherhood and homemaking and what a vital part of a family it really is. My mother was stay st home and raised me and I have many fond memories of my childhood.
You can be the exception all you want, but that isn't stopping the West from being demographically replaced. It's trad-wives like you who provide cover and ballast for the very feminists you claim to oppose. "Please let me have my cake and eat it too."
It doesn't matter that you're a trad-wife with 2 children and a loving husband. The vast majority of women aren't, and that's the problem.
Many countries have tried to bribe women into having children - giving tax exemptions for each child raised, giving them paid maternity leave, giving them government benefits, nothing works.
You know why? Just ask them.
"I'm focused on my career."
"I'm getting educated."
"I'm not ready for that yet."
It's so fucking easy. Take their rights away, they'll submit to men, and they'll raise children. They don't want to fucking work anyway! All of these 30 something women with their "degrees" and "careers" have no families and are fucking miserable! So just DO what must be DONE!
Women in our western society need a good education and be able to stand on their own.
No one can predict the future. It's so difficult for young ppl today. It was hard for boomers and their parents too. There is no letting up. If a man leaves, what is a woman to do. In earlier out days the man brought the game. If he died, the family dies, causing matriarchal culture.
In our day, men leave,they die, how is a woman to support 3 kids. My mother did. My father a holocaust survivor had mental problems and left.
Women need to look out for themselves, their is no guarantee for marital bliss.
Well then. You're an angry, bitter little person, aren't you? Probably because you're also very confused. Or a troll. Maybe both. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Realisticly for the Republic to survive you'll need to go right back to the original constitution with only a couple of the later amendments. That means the right to vote will be heavily restricted anyway, so it's best to just go all in.
Again. the thing I've noticed is that the more freedoms granted to women without any responsibility or accountabilty expected from them leads to less freedom for everyone else.
They don't seek to replace men, they seek to gain male authority without any of the responsibility. They're children LARPing as independent adults. But make no mistake, without womens' only grants, affirmative action, discrimination lawsuits, and gender quotas, the workforce would be entirely dominated by men. Men are allowing themselves to be displaced for the sake of propping up this egalitarian myth.
One of the biggest red pills is when you realize that society cares more about women's comfort than men's lives.
Hundreds of thousands of men die in wars (many of those are 18 year olds drafted into service), and although we throw a parade a couple of times a year, we keep doing it over and over...
but when the slightest inconveniences are placed on women it becomes a national crisis that society obsesses over until it's "rectified" - even if that solution is grossly
unfair (such as giving female soccer players the same salary and the same recognition as world-class male players, even though the women would get crushed in any high school boys tournament).
If we treated women as being disposable to the same extent that we treat men as disposable, in the 20th Century (up to and including the Vietnam era) 18-year-old girls would have been drafted as breeding partners for the soldiers who were drafted to fight.
The fact that such a thing is utterly inconceivable tells you everything there is to know about how strong female privilege has always been.
With such preferential treatment already in place, feminism never had a leg to stand on. Not even the first wave. But we let it happen, and now we're seeing the consequences.
It's the only chance we have at saving our Nation and it's people.
A) High fertility and birth rates
B) Female empowerment
MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. PICK ONE.
Depends on how you define female "empowerment." I'm a traditional, non-feminist female who stayed at home and raised two children and supported my husband of over 30 years (still do). I'm totally empowered.
Feminists discount the importance of motherhood and homemaking and what a vital part of a family it really is. My mother was stay st home and raised me and I have many fond memories of my childhood.
You can be the exception all you want, but that isn't stopping the West from being demographically replaced. It's trad-wives like you who provide cover and ballast for the very feminists you claim to oppose. "Please let me have my cake and eat it too."
It doesn't matter that you're a trad-wife with 2 children and a loving husband. The vast majority of women aren't, and that's the problem.
Many countries have tried to bribe women into having children - giving tax exemptions for each child raised, giving them paid maternity leave, giving them government benefits, nothing works.
You know why? Just ask them.
"I'm focused on my career."
"I'm getting educated."
"I'm not ready for that yet."
It's so fucking easy. Take their rights away, they'll submit to men, and they'll raise children. They don't want to fucking work anyway! All of these 30 something women with their "degrees" and "careers" have no families and are fucking miserable! So just DO what must be DONE!
Dude you are a fucking assclown. Get a job and move out of your mothers basement
Women in our western society need a good education and be able to stand on their own.
No one can predict the future. It's so difficult for young ppl today. It was hard for boomers and their parents too. There is no letting up. If a man leaves, what is a woman to do. In earlier out days the man brought the game. If he died, the family dies, causing matriarchal culture.
In our day, men leave,they die, how is a woman to support 3 kids. My mother did. My father a holocaust survivor had mental problems and left.
Women need to look out for themselves, their is no guarantee for marital bliss.
Well then. You're an angry, bitter little person, aren't you? Probably because you're also very confused. Or a troll. Maybe both. They aren't mutually exclusive.
A
Then you'll have to take womens' rights away. Are you willing to do what must be done?
Realisticly for the Republic to survive you'll need to go right back to the original constitution with only a couple of the later amendments. That means the right to vote will be heavily restricted anyway, so it's best to just go all in.
Again. the thing I've noticed is that the more freedoms granted to women without any responsibility or accountabilty expected from them leads to less freedom for everyone else.
They don't seek to replace men, they seek to gain male authority without any of the responsibility. They're children LARPing as independent adults. But make no mistake, without womens' only grants, affirmative action, discrimination lawsuits, and gender quotas, the workforce would be entirely dominated by men. Men are allowing themselves to be displaced for the sake of propping up this egalitarian myth.
One of the biggest red pills is when you realize that society cares more about women's comfort than men's lives.
Hundreds of thousands of men die in wars (many of those are 18 year olds drafted into service), and although we throw a parade a couple of times a year, we keep doing it over and over... but when the slightest inconveniences are placed on women it becomes a national crisis that society obsesses over until it's "rectified" - even if that solution is grossly unfair (such as giving female soccer players the same salary and the same recognition as world-class male players, even though the women would get crushed in any high school boys tournament). If we treated women as being disposable to the same extent that we treat men as disposable, in the 20th Century (up to and including the Vietnam era) 18-year-old girls would have been drafted as breeding partners for the soldiers who were drafted to fight.
The fact that such a thing is utterly inconceivable tells you everything there is to know about how strong female privilege has always been.
With such preferential treatment already in place, feminism never had a leg to stand on. Not even the first wave. But we let it happen, and now we're seeing the consequences.
niceeee
and then one day for no reason at all