People who don't know shit about cancer itt. Cancer isn't one disease; it's a zoo of different diseases that require different treatments. Since the 70s, we actually have massively increased the survivability of a lot of cancers.
Thank you! I work in pharma, there are so therapeutic mechanisms that are being tested. Many have already been shown successful and have commercially available drugs. Cancer is complex and is a big group of different types, which can act very different from one another
We also don’t have vaccines for the common cold. We don’t have test/culture for colds, we also don’t have therapeutics for colds. The flu vaccine “effective” 50% at its best. We have Tamiflu to shorten a flu, but it’s side effects can be just as bad or worse than flu. And we going to have an effective vaccine this year with minimal side effects for a novel virus, this year? That’s pretty much their point, but the focus being on cancer treatment instead.
A vaccine isn't a cure. Let's get that straight right now. A cure is a means to overcome the disease. Antibiotics are a cure for a bacterial infection. A vaccine is more preventative: it's a way to teach a person's antibodies how to fight the disease if and when they get it. A lot of times this means giving someone an inert or dead form of the virus to show the antibodies the "shape" of the virus. But flu vaccines aren't 100% effective because viruses evolve. You could give everyone a vaccine, but "Oops, there's a new strain now, masks stay on."
Cancer is a different disease. Cures encompass surgery for many cancers that easily cure them. Other cancers that cannot be removed with surgery can be treated effectively, mostly hematological cancers, with medication and completely cured.
Cancer is just a different beast from other diseases because it is essentially YOU turning against yourself. One of your cells goes rogue and starts just multiplying like crazy damaging everything around it. So how do you cure it? You kill ALL the cells without killing the healthy cells or you cut the bad cells out before they spread.
Cancer cures exist, they have >95% success rates, but there are just so many different cancers that cannot be cured by the same therapy. So using this is a bad analogy.
If you want a good analogy use HIV. Millions donated. No cure in sight. Because lifelong drug cocktails are more profitable and also they just can't get a vaccine right that doesn't immediately give you HIV or can actively combat HIV because HIV targets the same cells that are supposed to trigger that response properly.
Medicine is complicated. Don't let skepticism of an untested vaccine and obviously politically biased "research" cloud your judgement of what saves lives daily.
Just like if they have/find a cure for the chinese virus they will just release a new one and we'll be back to square 1. The only way to end this shit is to defeat the deepstate/China.
This, there’s will never be one “cure for cancer” because there’s so many different mechanisms. My son is at high risk for some child hood cancers and I’m in contact with many other parents whose children have the same condition. Often one of the children will get cancer- they have treatment, and 95+% survival rate for all the cancers this group of kids are susceptible to
Most cancer patients don’t live long enough to make repeat sales. Hep C is now curable - 89k for a full dosage. There is money in cures and they will charge for it and insurance will pay most of it.
Depends on the type and stage. Patients that live for years get treatment and checks for remission before eventually going into remission after which another treatment may or may not be recommended. They are not getting actual treatment for years. Many opt for no treatment after a certain point.
Willingness to believe the info is the hard part...although, vitamin infusion is probably low/cost and low/risk so it is certainly worth a shot. The 90k Hep C pill dosage is only given to patients with organ failure - guess the transplant is more than the dose but you have to reach that stage before it’s even covered by insurance. You can find valid publications that say almost anything you want - you’d think more info is better but there is so much pressure to publish for various reason, garbage ‘studies’ help mask the valid ones.
You're righter than you know. Check out ozone therapy (if they havent scrubbed it from the internet). Doctors were curing thousands of people, forced to flee to Philippines, FDA actually swatted them with the locals all the way over there. Or Dr. Sebi who actually won a federal court case over his treatments.
The sciences a compromised. They have an an agenda and dogma. All driven by money. Look at nuclear fusion. It's the energy of tomorrow, and it always will be.
Anyone who is somewhat scientifically literate, know fusion is a fools errand. But they have invested so much already, they keep heaping bad money on a practical impossibility. Nuclear reactors are cool toys for scientists for the wealthy, built on the false promise of a few billion more dollars and a few decades more time. They are like formula 1 race cars, in the sense that they are expensive highly tuned pieces of machinery, but impractical for anything that the masses would benefit from.
In the sciences, all you need to do now if follow the money, in any field to see it is rife with impropriety.
100% HORSE SHIT. HEP C complications are profitable too, but the recent CURE is about 90k - i.e., better money than the treatment where Pharma makes the money not the hospital. Further, hospitals mostly provide services for cancer treatments - yes, they use drugs, but the money is from labor which Pharma does not benefit form. Treatment for early cancers has improved significantly over the years as well as excision and removal techniques which stop the spread - it’s not profitable to stop the spread, so why do they do it? There are drugs that target specific cancers and Pharma does release them because Pharma makes money. If there was some magic panacea, Pharma would release it, charge insurance a shitload, and make a shitload of money. They have every incentive to do this. Medicine is still pretty fucking barbaric - we swap organs, stitch, mend broken bones and use drugs, most of which are certainly not magic - it’s an art, not so much a science. Medical efficacy pretty low and has not advanced that much in the last 30 years. Our best weapon against cancers is radiation - which kills everything...proton and immunotherapy may help, but the only know cure is to burn it with radiation! CRISPR and gene editing is likely the only option to offer real cures, and has already worked for some conditions, but it’s pretty new. If there’s ever been a time to be hopeful it’s not and it’s with gene editing. It’s tempting to say other forces want people to suffer to make money, but logically and incentive-wise, it’s likely not true. Some cancer victims die in months...not much money. Others get treated and remiss once and that’s usually done-zees. ~100k a year is the avg. cost - no way cheap, but a legitimate cure could easily cost this or slightly more and would be worth every penny and likely be mostly covered by insurance.
Like masks, the 'vaccine' neednt be more complicated than the assurance of 'safety.' Covid's already harmless to 99.97%, people just need a placebo to believe in as strongly as the germ-nets on their faces.
You say it's more effective than any vaccine before, protecting 99.97% of people, and boom. Stupid people get it to feel as safe as smart people.
There is no cure for the common cold (human corona virus). Even if they made a vaccine, there will be new virus variants. This isn't new. This isn't the first or last time people will get sick (some more severe than others). Most will get over it. The reaction to this current plandemic is idiotic by comparison.
The two are extremely different. One is a singualr virus that can be targeted and killed, the other is random cells growing amok caused be any number of things. Environmental contagions, genetic errors and can happen in any type of cell.
Cancer mortality has massively decreased. That money was well spent. There will never be one single "cure" for cancer because it's a process that can occur in the body in many different ways for many different reasons. Cures are profitable. You sell them to sick people. And in fact many horrific diseases have been eradicated from the Western world in the past 100 years. Polio, smallpox, etc.
Cancer is too profitable to find a cure.
Ugh this guys math is way off, it is closer to 1.5 trillion that has been raised to fund cancer research.
People who don't know shit about cancer itt. Cancer isn't one disease; it's a zoo of different diseases that require different treatments. Since the 70s, we actually have massively increased the survivability of a lot of cancers.
Thank you! I work in pharma, there are so therapeutic mechanisms that are being tested. Many have already been shown successful and have commercially available drugs. Cancer is complex and is a big group of different types, which can act very different from one another
People just be saying they suspect an effort of push for the profitability of cancer treatment. They be right
Cancer isn't a virus.
HPV is a virus, certain strains cause cervical cancer.
Yep
We also don’t have vaccines for the common cold. We don’t have test/culture for colds, we also don’t have therapeutics for colds. The flu vaccine “effective” 50% at its best. We have Tamiflu to shorten a flu, but it’s side effects can be just as bad or worse than flu. And we going to have an effective vaccine this year with minimal side effects for a novel virus, this year? That’s pretty much their point, but the focus being on cancer treatment instead.
A vaccine isn't a cure. Let's get that straight right now. A cure is a means to overcome the disease. Antibiotics are a cure for a bacterial infection. A vaccine is more preventative: it's a way to teach a person's antibodies how to fight the disease if and when they get it. A lot of times this means giving someone an inert or dead form of the virus to show the antibodies the "shape" of the virus. But flu vaccines aren't 100% effective because viruses evolve. You could give everyone a vaccine, but "Oops, there's a new strain now, masks stay on."
1971 is now almost 50 years ago.
There’s a reason the math was easy for me Pede. 😉
Cancer is a different disease. Cures encompass surgery for many cancers that easily cure them. Other cancers that cannot be removed with surgery can be treated effectively, mostly hematological cancers, with medication and completely cured.
Cancer is just a different beast from other diseases because it is essentially YOU turning against yourself. One of your cells goes rogue and starts just multiplying like crazy damaging everything around it. So how do you cure it? You kill ALL the cells without killing the healthy cells or you cut the bad cells out before they spread.
Cancer cures exist, they have >95% success rates, but there are just so many different cancers that cannot be cured by the same therapy. So using this is a bad analogy.
If you want a good analogy use HIV. Millions donated. No cure in sight. Because lifelong drug cocktails are more profitable and also they just can't get a vaccine right that doesn't immediately give you HIV or can actively combat HIV because HIV targets the same cells that are supposed to trigger that response properly.
Medicine is complicated. Don't let skepticism of an untested vaccine and obviously politically biased "research" cloud your judgement of what saves lives daily.
I wish I could upvoate you more
Just like if they have/find a cure for the chinese virus they will just release a new one and we'll be back to square 1. The only way to end this shit is to defeat the deepstate/China.
Cancer doesn't work like that man. Each cancer is a result of different types of cells going haywire in different ways.
This, there’s will never be one “cure for cancer” because there’s so many different mechanisms. My son is at high risk for some child hood cancers and I’m in contact with many other parents whose children have the same condition. Often one of the children will get cancer- they have treatment, and 95+% survival rate for all the cancers this group of kids are susceptible to
Most cancer patients don’t live long enough to make repeat sales. Hep C is now curable - 89k for a full dosage. There is money in cures and they will charge for it and insurance will pay most of it.
Depends on the type and stage. Patients that live for years get treatment and checks for remission before eventually going into remission after which another treatment may or may not be recommended. They are not getting actual treatment for years. Many opt for no treatment after a certain point.
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hepatitis.html
Or a couple of hundred dollars and a willingness to believe the info.
Willingness to believe the info is the hard part...although, vitamin infusion is probably low/cost and low/risk so it is certainly worth a shot. The 90k Hep C pill dosage is only given to patients with organ failure - guess the transplant is more than the dose but you have to reach that stage before it’s even covered by insurance. You can find valid publications that say almost anything you want - you’d think more info is better but there is so much pressure to publish for various reason, garbage ‘studies’ help mask the valid ones.
You're righter than you know. Check out ozone therapy (if they havent scrubbed it from the internet). Doctors were curing thousands of people, forced to flee to Philippines, FDA actually swatted them with the locals all the way over there. Or Dr. Sebi who actually won a federal court case over his treatments.
The sciences a compromised. They have an an agenda and dogma. All driven by money. Look at nuclear fusion. It's the energy of tomorrow, and it always will be.
Anyone who is somewhat scientifically literate, know fusion is a fools errand. But they have invested so much already, they keep heaping bad money on a practical impossibility. Nuclear reactors are cool toys for scientists for the wealthy, built on the false promise of a few billion more dollars and a few decades more time. They are like formula 1 race cars, in the sense that they are expensive highly tuned pieces of machinery, but impractical for anything that the masses would benefit from.
In the sciences, all you need to do now if follow the money, in any field to see it is rife with impropriety.
I bet you that all the top people know there is a cure but will never give it to normal pebes.
Wouldn’t be surprised one iota. Seriously
100% HORSE SHIT. HEP C complications are profitable too, but the recent CURE is about 90k - i.e., better money than the treatment where Pharma makes the money not the hospital. Further, hospitals mostly provide services for cancer treatments - yes, they use drugs, but the money is from labor which Pharma does not benefit form. Treatment for early cancers has improved significantly over the years as well as excision and removal techniques which stop the spread - it’s not profitable to stop the spread, so why do they do it? There are drugs that target specific cancers and Pharma does release them because Pharma makes money. If there was some magic panacea, Pharma would release it, charge insurance a shitload, and make a shitload of money. They have every incentive to do this. Medicine is still pretty fucking barbaric - we swap organs, stitch, mend broken bones and use drugs, most of which are certainly not magic - it’s an art, not so much a science. Medical efficacy pretty low and has not advanced that much in the last 30 years. Our best weapon against cancers is radiation - which kills everything...proton and immunotherapy may help, but the only know cure is to burn it with radiation! CRISPR and gene editing is likely the only option to offer real cures, and has already worked for some conditions, but it’s pretty new. If there’s ever been a time to be hopeful it’s not and it’s with gene editing. It’s tempting to say other forces want people to suffer to make money, but logically and incentive-wise, it’s likely not true. Some cancer victims die in months...not much money. Others get treated and remiss once and that’s usually done-zees. ~100k a year is the avg. cost - no way cheap, but a legitimate cure could easily cost this or slightly more and would be worth every penny and likely be mostly covered by insurance.
Like masks, the 'vaccine' neednt be more complicated than the assurance of 'safety.' Covid's already harmless to 99.97%, people just need a placebo to believe in as strongly as the germ-nets on their faces.
You say it's more effective than any vaccine before, protecting 99.97% of people, and boom. Stupid people get it to feel as safe as smart people.
I think they’ve found the cure to several cancers but those patents were bought and Shelved. Or it’s hidden for elite use only.
There is no cure for the common cold (human corona virus). Even if they made a vaccine, there will be new virus variants. This isn't new. This isn't the first or last time people will get sick (some more severe than others). Most will get over it. The reaction to this current plandemic is idiotic by comparison.
No money in curing a disease. Treating diseases makes you super rich.
The two are extremely different. One is a singualr virus that can be targeted and killed, the other is random cells growing amok caused be any number of things. Environmental contagions, genetic errors and can happen in any type of cell.
Farma only adopts containment never curing of a desease.
Yep! I never give to cancer funds. Total scam and alot of people are making money off the never-ending quest for a cure. Check out Susan G Komen.
Cancer mortality has massively decreased. That money was well spent. There will never be one single "cure" for cancer because it's a process that can occur in the body in many different ways for many different reasons. Cures are profitable. You sell them to sick people. And in fact many horrific diseases have been eradicated from the Western world in the past 100 years. Polio, smallpox, etc.