3204
posted ago by pharmacyman848 ago by pharmacyman848 +3204 / -0

Sometimes I’ll just be like ‘you’re not a high school social studies teacher, you don’t need a works cited page. Either believe it or not.’ Other times I’ll point out their pattern of behavior and argument strategy before they even get to the final stage, where they say since it didn’t come from a reputable source it doesn’t count. They don’t seem to grasp all of their beliefs are being influenced by propaganda sources so of course any real news will seem strange to them. They’re interesting creatures.

Comments (354)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
38
BarronTrumpIsAGiant 38 points ago +38 / -0

I used to love wikipedia... but now that their cofounder has come out and said that it is edited toward leftist agendas... I think we need better than wikipedia.

23
AsaNisiMAGA 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's been unreliable for a long time. Some topics are far worse than others.

https://youtu.be/Wqw527ivrQE

13
BarronTrumpIsAGiant 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yesterday I was looking at Casey Anthony (that hot mom who killed her baby in Orlando) and I was surprised that Casey Anthony doesn't have a wikipedia page. The killing of her daughter has a page, the trial has a page, but not the mother. It's gotta be explained by some legal reasons, but its still really making me curious how it can be the case. I'm serious, check out https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Casey_Anthony&redirect=no and you'll find nothing on the mother/killer.

6
AsaNisiMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Interesting. I wonder who else and what else is omitted?

9
BarronTrumpIsAGiant 9 points ago +9 / -0

I do find it interesting how Kapernick's wikipedia page is twice as long as the page for Donald Trump's family. Leftist pages have information about every trivial and minute detail about someone's life.

4
RandomUzer 4 points ago +4 / -0

lie by omission is the lefts favorite trick.

8
slaphappy2 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wikipedia IS totally biased leftwards. However, it is still useful if you are smart enough to understand how they perform biasing and you cross-corroborate with other sources.

3
CastleBravo 3 points ago +3 / -0

To be fair I had a big Wikipedia success that's still up. They kept denying my edit for petty reasons until I provided 3 trusted lefty NewsGuard certified sources (all ranked 100/100 by them) that agreed with me. I still check from time to time wondering when someone will take it down but they haven't since.

8
itsdangerous 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wikipedia have been slowly fakenewsed over the past 10y. Some articles are now straight up propaganda. Sad.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
amarie 4 points ago +4 / -0

WOW! This is WAY better than Wikipedia. I looked up Melania Trump and the difference was noticeable. The wording is the key. Thanks for the link!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
Aquamine-Amarine 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chrome and Brave are both freaking out telling me that site is dangerous?

3
GodSaveTheWest 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah, lots of people get smeared for political reasons and history is reshaped into a leftist viewpoint on wikipedia.