September 9th? That is National deplorable day. The anniversary of when Hillary gave the speech referring to Trump supporters as a basket of deplorables. Apropos
the good news is it's Judicial watch and they know damn well she won't say anything. That's why all they do is present the evidence in court against her, to support their claims. They don't need her to speak. She just needs to show up, and be held in judgement, and she's being legally compelled to do so. Now she may be found guilty; but clinton is the type of person that could be held guilty of murder and the next week she'd be in tahiti. But that shouldn't stop us from officially charging her, because as we've found, there's a new sheriff in town, and if the courts find her guilty in the eyes of the public, then if she's assasinated in tahiti peopel will feel like it's justice served.
Testifying to someone she OWNS regarding a scenario that EVERYONE is involved in and has the ability to make everyone just as GUILTY as she is. Yeah, that's gonna happen.
"I don't recall."
"I don't recall."
"I DON'T RECALL."
"I DON'T FUCKING RECALL!"
"I DO NOT FUCKING RECALL, MOTHERFUCKER!"
"WHAT FUCKING DIFFERENCE DOES IT FUCKING MAKE AT THIS POINT?"
There, now you don't have to watch it...
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE, I DO NKT RECALL
What difference at this point does it make?
September 9th? That is National deplorable day. The anniversary of when Hillary gave the speech referring to Trump supporters as a basket of deplorables. Apropos
Press X to doubt. Im guessing Hawaiian judge comes in and issues a stay until November 4th
SEPT? Ah well. Worth the wait. JAIL JAIL JAIL JAIL...
That popcorn machine I bought really was a good investment.
any brother got a source on this?
I searched quite a lot and didn't find it, but I've read it somewhere. Here's a good start to try to find that date
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/02/appeals-court-clinton-testify-emails-297132
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/21/fact-check-hillary-clinton-wasnt-court-testifying-june-2/3199725001/
This link says 'no evidence she will go to court in Sept', but the person to ask would be JUDICIAL WATCH since they are the plaintiff AFAIK
thank you pede.
i also found these: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/02/hillary-clinton-must-testify-in-email-case-judge-rules.html
*** this article actually states the september 9th date: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/06/hillary_clinton_lost_her_appeal_order_stands_testify_on_private_server_and_benghazi_emails.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3OoVnWT0oU
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-seven-new-foia-lawsuits-against-state-department-to-force-release-of-clinton-emails-other-secret-email-records/
here's some more:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HeqX84NtOSFj/
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/clinton-loses-appeal-must-testify-regarding-private-server-missing-emails/ (this one includes the sep 9th date)
FOUND IT!
https://youtu.be/_3OoVnWT0oU?t=5640
(timestamped)
Probably nothing of interest on 9/9. Maybe though. Maybe...
Most interesting possible outcome: HRC held in contempt of court and a bench warrant is issued?
Most likely outcome: more stalling and nonsense.
Sooo expect more riots that day to distract and obfuscate? Got it.
So what kind of terrible catastrophe is going to conveniently happen to take attention away from that?
😎😎😎
I ONLY recall the 5th amendment!
Wrong verb. Correct verb is “testiLYING.” Not testifying.
the good news is it's Judicial watch and they know damn well she won't say anything. That's why all they do is present the evidence in court against her, to support their claims. They don't need her to speak. She just needs to show up, and be held in judgement, and she's being legally compelled to do so. Now she may be found guilty; but clinton is the type of person that could be held guilty of murder and the next week she'd be in tahiti. But that shouldn't stop us from officially charging her, because as we've found, there's a new sheriff in town, and if the courts find her guilty in the eyes of the public, then if she's assasinated in tahiti peopel will feel like it's justice served.
mhm..
She will of course, be supercilious and churlish
no contempt of congress given
just like anyone 'unofficially' in the CIA
Rip to the judges
I'm asking unironically: at this point, what difference does it make?
False flag incoming in 3, 2, 1....
Put her in jail on 9/11
Testifying to someone she OWNS regarding a scenario that EVERYONE is involved in and has the ability to make everyone just as GUILTY as she is. Yeah, that's gonna happen.