3474
Comments (138)
sorted by:
161
fthecoup 161 points ago +161 / -0

Seems like every photo after her arrest, she is boo-hooing, crying, depressed looking.

But why? She should be angry, defiant, principled!! Is this what reality does to a brainwashed spoiled brat?

161
AngryCitizen [S] 161 points ago +161 / -0

She is crying to activate her Female Privilege.

62
deleted 62 points ago +62 / -0
21
deleted 21 points ago +24 / -3
19
RocketSurgeon22 19 points ago +19 / -0

Seriously doubt she gets off.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
12
Boomillennial 12 points ago +12 / -0

These are federal charges. If these were state charges, yeah, she would get off. The commonwealth sucks.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
RocketSurgeon22 4 points ago +4 / -0

It"s a Federal case not state.

4
beta-detector 4 points ago +4 / -0

She'll be tried in federal court. Most likely not in MA.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
DaLaohu 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not MA. It's the Federal Government.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
21
deleted 21 points ago +24 / -3
9
that_sound 9 points ago +9 / -0

hmm

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
fthecoup 7 points ago +7 / -0

I thought there was a toggle switch for that

35
SomeDiggity 35 points ago +35 / -0

Such brave, much stunning

34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
21
BarronTrumpIsAGiant 21 points ago +21 / -0

This crooked judge is a scumbag. Disgusting.

21
CapnFalcoAnPoo 21 points ago +21 / -0

it's like when Weinstein pulled out the geriatric walker.

8
fthecoup 8 points ago +8 / -0

That was classic!!

3
edxzxz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Am I hoping for too much if I expect to at least some degree that Biden will make his entrance onto the stage for live on tv debates wearing a tattered bathrobe and kleenex boxes on his feet?

4
CelesteD 4 points ago +4 / -0

He should be wearing a sniffguard. And not because of Corona, either.

2
PinochetIsMyHero 2 points ago +2 / -0

"We'll take the Spruce Moose!"

0
flashersenpai 0 points ago +1 / -1

reminder that Weinstein wasn't allowed to provide evidence in his defense and his accusers weren't the gold standard of victims

71
Fullarr 71 points ago +71 / -0

She thinks crying will make us feel sorry for her.

She's wrong

37
top_eagle 37 points ago +37 / -0

It makes me thirsty for more of those delicious tears.

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
16
ModernKnight 16 points ago +16 / -0

Regardless of which it is, my cup is only half full. Keep the tears coming!

62
deleted 62 points ago +63 / -1
27
AngryCitizen [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

All the appointed judges are the worst. At least State elected judges have some accountability to the people.

10
knightofday 10 points ago +10 / -0

No fucking doubt. The appointed ones are out of control

11
spezisacuckold 11 points ago +13 / -2

You absolutely cannot trust judges. Judges are human. Humans have biases. Until we create some form of open source digital judge that applies the law equally, you absolutely should place zero trust in judges. Never trust, always verify.

Read Men in Black by Mark Levin if you haven’t already.

1
TRUMPTRAINTODC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Elect law abiding republicans that follow Trump Doctrine

40
0095D 40 points ago +40 / -0

This lady hasn't had her trial yet?! Didn't she do this, like, two or three years ago?

19
AngryCitizen [S] 19 points ago +19 / -0

Justice is too snails procrastinating.

10
Jsmitty112 10 points ago +10 / -0

Just delayed is justice denied. They need to speed it up

11
spezisacuckold 11 points ago +11 / -0

Whatever happened to the constitutional right to a speedy trial...

6
MaoHatesSparrows 6 points ago +6 / -0

The lawyer industry.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
spezisacuckold 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Everything surrounding” a trial should be considered part of the trial and should be constitutionally protected as well.

Change my mind.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
35
SwampView 35 points ago +35 / -0

Delicious. Sorry Judge, bad judgement. Glad she is being held accountable.

26
AngryCitizen [S] 26 points ago +26 / -0

Yes what a very Leftist way to think: I don’t have to follow a law if I don’t like it! And I can’t be punished because I’m a JUDGE!

8
thehacker4channel 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yet they don’t want anyone to know about Jury Nullification.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
8
edxzxz 8 points ago +8 / -0

If they had to give somebody involved in this criminal scheme immunity to hold the others accountable, I like it that they did it for the defense attorney - it highlights the reality for any other Judge who would presume to be above the law and try this stunt again that the prick you're doing this favor for will fuck you over. Kind of like the pasty white morons who show up for BLM shit and then get their asses beat by blacks who hate them for being white.

16
ShakeYourTrumpThang 16 points ago +16 / -0

Judging her completely by her appearance... She's never had to even think about dealing with consequences of her actions.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
12
AngryCitizen [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

That’s why we must own it all for 12 more years

11
AntsCamera 11 points ago +11 / -0

That pic, boooo hooo, but I'm a democrat, I am supposed to get away with doing shit like this!

10
notappendges 10 points ago +10 / -0

No one is above the law./Pelosi voice

6
AngryCitizen [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean drunk voice?

10
garagedoorhandle 10 points ago +10 / -0

Undermining the very thing she’s sworn to uphold. Send her back with him.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
Reddeath195 8 points ago +8 / -0

And we say bye bye go to prison.

7
pursuitoftruth1776 7 points ago +7 / -0

Where's the trial for Corey Booker who even filmed himself trying to sneak illegals into the US?

5
AngryCitizen [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Too many intersectional points lol

7
MonkeyCzarFunny 7 points ago +7 / -0

Get wokey, head to the pokey.

7
Rucktoe 7 points ago +7 / -0

A lesser form of swamp filth.

She thought she was far from the drain.

6
DRKMSTR 6 points ago +6 / -0

Judges can't make laws nor can they bypass it.

You reap what you sow.

6
Ragnar_Danneskjold 6 points ago +9 / -3

The charge should be Treason.

5
AngryCitizen [S] 5 points ago +8 / -3

That’s not what Treason is.

5
Ragnar_Danneskjold 5 points ago +8 / -3

She gave literal aid to an enemy. Textbook Treason.

6
AngryCitizen [S] 6 points ago +9 / -3

We aren’t at war with wherever that illegal is from.

Let’s let the Left be the dummies.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
AngryCitizen [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agree one jillion percent.

3
Thearchduke 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who said we arent at war?

  1. The Constitution does not require a state of war for Treason to be committed.
6
570dbp 6 points ago +6 / -0

The feminization of the political system has negative consequences on America’s law and order. Over and over, we see these Karens in politics who only act with their emotions and are drunk with their power, but do not uphold their allegiances to the U.S. constitution that they have sworn to protect and abide by.

1
123breadman 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want to destroy the US by letting criminals free.

2
570dbp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Law is law, no buts and ifs. If someone is found to be guilty of committing a crime, he or she should be convicted and sent to prison. This should apply to ALL criminals, big and small. When these judges and the government decide to ignore the law and apply it selectively, then the nation becomes lawless. A lawless nation cannot survive in the long run.

How difficult is it for these idiots who sit on the bench to understand this? Apparently, it's difficult for many of them who judge by emotions and politics instead by law.

1
123breadman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You forget, if they are illegal they have to be deported ASAP, no staying in prison unless we are giving them the death sentence for killing someone.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

In what year can we step back and decide whether universal suffrage is a good thing?

5
DarkBerry 5 points ago +5 / -0

String that motherfucker up. Set an example. They should be held to the highest standard if they are judging their fellow man.

5
RockFlagAndEagle2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Someone bottle those liberal tears up, I'm dying of thirst over here.

5
HockeyMom4Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good! A judge is supposed to uphold the law, not break the law.

Off to jail she needs to go.

5
ProudWhiteMan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now do D.A.s

5
Avdimar 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need more judges in jail. Hate this above the law bullshit so many of them practice. If they know they will go to jail for going against our Constitution, I bet less judges side with Commies.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Bedminster 4 points ago +4 / -0

She had to be told Obama was not in office, enjoy jail commie cunt!

4
chahn1138 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Best of News! This Lady is a CRIMINAL!

BASTA!

2
chahn1138 2 points ago +2 / -0

She thought that she was so cool.....well, the Law is the Law.

Shouldn't be having to explain that to a JUDGE!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Dev404 4 points ago +4 / -0

First time facing consequences eh judge? All the lives you probably messed up with your activism and you couldn't care less. Now it's your turn and you cry and want sympathy? Go rot in prison and then get deported after your sentence is over.

4
Desertwhale 4 points ago +4 / -0

So happy to see this. I remember when this happened, and thought nothing could happen to her.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
NvJohansson 4 points ago +4 / -0

Throwing away your career to help an illegal criminal, what a fucking idiot. Make an example of this pos.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
rabbitholed 3 points ago +3 / -0

judicial activism is cancer and should be dealt with accordingly

3
SlightlyLargerTub 3 points ago +3 / -0

The judge who denied her request to dismiss the charges, U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin, appointed by Obama.

3
drsowells1fan 3 points ago +3 / -0

What satisfying news on a Monday mornin'! Watching this bitch's life savings drain away on legal fees will be glorious. Can't wait until she has to sell that lovely house in the safe suburbs.....

1
123breadman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean in her gated community. Then shell be forced to live in the barrio like I do.

1
AngryCitizen [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think actually her defense is paid for because she is a judge and it involves her judicial work.

2
drsowells1fan 2 points ago +2 / -0

True....Hopefully one or more civil suits will bankrupt her.

3
Scuffers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actions have consequences, even if you are a judge.

no matter what the outcome of this, she needs to be removed from any public office.

3
TrumpCard1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dumb bitch found out.

3
mainsoda 3 points ago +3 / -0

This shouldn't be rare.

3
YaBoiJacob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Deport her

3
sdj9252 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope they BUST HER ASS!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Tendie_Diagnostician 3 points ago +3 / -0

Aren't judges supposed to understand the law?

3
Grond999 3 points ago +3 / -0

Put that c-unt behind bars FFS!

3
VetforTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good she needs to do 10 years, be disbarred and ruined. Lady you drank the koolaid, its all on you.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
nomoreprinkles 3 points ago +3 / -0

Solitary for life for abuse of power

2
AenAllAin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Buck-up butter-cup! You might be on the wrong side of the jail bars, but, cross your fingers, you might be on the right side of history (if the USA collapses and Mexico turns things around to become the next world super-power).

...but don't hold your breath.

...actually, do hold your breath.

2
chahn1138 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one needs a taste of Reality more than Judges in this Country!

Wake up and Taste REAL JUSTICE Lady!

2
JoeBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope somehow we can start prosecuting these judges and DAs for making the legal system political.