Perhaps the suggestion is the current vaccines are administered in an uncoordinated way, some people get theirs one year, others the next - if there was something nefarious in it, there's time to be discovered. With a pandemic, there's an opportunity to give a lot more of the population a vaccine at the same time.
Which still shouldn't matter. They don't need to inject their super spy chips or whatever into everyone at the same time, especially if this is supposedly some decades-long ooga-booga shit. You think an extra year or two would matter to them?
You don't necessarily need to know any intricate details of something to understand the basics. This smacks of listening to black supremacists/Twitterati comparing gentrification to genocide. If the goal was to use vaccines as a vector for nefarious bullshit, they have long had them as their tool. COVID-19 doesn't give them anything new. If anything, it would likely make it more difficult for them due to the increased/renewed skepticism of medicine in general.
Unless I'm misinterpreting you, your argument is that if they were going to do something with vaccines they would have already, therefore they will not do it in the future?
What if there was a recent breakthrough in tech that has allowed them to do something now that they couldn't before? Or maybe they have a bold next step that is difficult to hide so it needs to be done simultaneously worldwide?
Perhaps the suggestion is the current vaccines are administered in an uncoordinated way, some people get theirs one year, others the next - if there was something nefarious in it, there's time to be discovered. With a pandemic, there's an opportunity to give a lot more of the population a vaccine at the same time.
Which still shouldn't matter. They don't need to inject their super spy chips or whatever into everyone at the same time, especially if this is supposedly some decades-long ooga-booga shit. You think an extra year or two would matter to them?
Look at us here arguing about something we know nothing about. Lightning strikes aren't always necessary, but they definitely can reduce risk.
You don't necessarily need to know any intricate details of something to understand the basics. This smacks of listening to black supremacists/Twitterati comparing gentrification to genocide. If the goal was to use vaccines as a vector for nefarious bullshit, they have long had them as their tool. COVID-19 doesn't give them anything new. If anything, it would likely make it more difficult for them due to the increased/renewed skepticism of medicine in general.
Unless I'm misinterpreting you, your argument is that if they were going to do something with vaccines they would have already, therefore they will not do it in the future?
What if there was a recent breakthrough in tech that has allowed them to do something now that they couldn't before? Or maybe they have a bold next step that is difficult to hide so it needs to be done simultaneously worldwide?