You don't necessarily need to know any intricate details of something to understand the basics. This smacks of listening to black supremacists/Twitterati comparing gentrification to genocide. If the goal was to use vaccines as a vector for nefarious bullshit, they have long had them as their tool. COVID-19 doesn't give them anything new. If anything, it would likely make it more difficult for them due to the increased/renewed skepticism of medicine in general.
Unless I'm misinterpreting you, your argument is that if they were going to do something with vaccines they would have already, therefore they will not do it in the future?
What if there was a recent breakthrough in tech that has allowed them to do something now that they couldn't before? Or maybe they have a bold next step that is difficult to hide so it needs to be done simultaneously worldwide?
This entire narrative relies on so many hypotheticals that it's almost comical.
What "bold next step"? What "recent breakthrough"? It being done simultaneously would more than likely make it even MORE difficult to hide. Nearly everyone has a camera and near-instantaneous communication at their fingertips. The rabble-rousing caused by COVID seems to have only increased skepticism in vaccines and likely in medicine in general.
I don't know what the "bold step" or anything else might be, just trying to keep an open mind.
I think I need to spell out my position for you:
I am pro vaccine. I have had every appropriate vaccine and will continue to do so, however all the vaccines I have had are not new and have had an opportunity to be examined by the wider community. To me, any risks of the vaccines are outweighed by benefit.
If you wanted to roll something out to the whole population new and untested vaccine given to the world close to simultaneously would be an opportunity that has not yet occured in human history.
That's it. I want to be cautious and approach anything promoted by Bill Gates and the CDC with scepticism.
Look at us here arguing about something we know nothing about. Lightning strikes aren't always necessary, but they definitely can reduce risk.
You don't necessarily need to know any intricate details of something to understand the basics. This smacks of listening to black supremacists/Twitterati comparing gentrification to genocide. If the goal was to use vaccines as a vector for nefarious bullshit, they have long had them as their tool. COVID-19 doesn't give them anything new. If anything, it would likely make it more difficult for them due to the increased/renewed skepticism of medicine in general.
Unless I'm misinterpreting you, your argument is that if they were going to do something with vaccines they would have already, therefore they will not do it in the future?
What if there was a recent breakthrough in tech that has allowed them to do something now that they couldn't before? Or maybe they have a bold next step that is difficult to hide so it needs to be done simultaneously worldwide?
Sort of.
This entire narrative relies on so many hypotheticals that it's almost comical.
What "bold next step"? What "recent breakthrough"? It being done simultaneously would more than likely make it even MORE difficult to hide. Nearly everyone has a camera and near-instantaneous communication at their fingertips. The rabble-rousing caused by COVID seems to have only increased skepticism in vaccines and likely in medicine in general.
I don't know what the "bold step" or anything else might be, just trying to keep an open mind.
I think I need to spell out my position for you: