I understand that, but my brain won't go there. I don't understand them or their rationalization, or them not seeing that "muh Russia" did not prove the President did one thing wrong, yet they use that as "proof" of something. It's like "hands up, don't shoot". You know what I mean?
The authorities tell them they are.
So in their minds, they are.
I understand that, but my brain won't go there. I don't understand them or their rationalization, or them not seeing that "muh Russia" did not prove the President did one thing wrong, yet they use that as "proof" of something. It's like "hands up, don't shoot". You know what I mean?