385
Comments (20)
sorted by:
12
MsAnthropic 12 points ago +13 / -1

I actually agree with her - children should not be given these treatments, no matter how much they want them. She’s right, someone failed in their duty of care to her as a child. Her parents mostly, but also the doctors.

5
Batmemejr3 5 points ago +6 / -1

Did she sign anything saying that this is what she wanted? If so... Case dismissed.

5
Error404LifeNotFound 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm actually on her side on this one. If she wins, then doctors are effectively banned from sex changes on minors. that's a win in my book.

The doctors and parents are at fault. Kids will be confused as their hormones kick in. It is the parents' responsibility to help their child navigate teenager life. It is the doctor's responsibility to know WTF biology is.

2
Batmemejr3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Point made and taken 👍

4
Tx50bmg 4 points ago +5 / -1

She was 16 when she started puberty blockers, 17 when she started hormones and 20 when she had a double mastectomy. A minor cannot enter into a legally binding contact, so anything she would've signed for the first two would be inadmissible.

7
JwPATX 7 points ago +7 / -0

Or it’s admissible as evidence against the defendants/knowingly having a 16 year old sign a contract/waiver indicates that they knew that what they were doing was wrong.

5
Tx50bmg 5 points ago +6 / -1

Agreed. One wonders why she's not suing her parents, but I'm sure she's going after the deep pockets. Quelle surprise.

5
DeusExMAGAna 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://www.gillhams.com/site/library/legal_articles/minors_and_contractual_agreements.html

Based off that and the way the UK is approaching gender reassignment as being a medical necessity, there’s a very good case to be made that she understood what she was doing and that it was medically necessary, thereby making the contract binding, as it should be. It sucks for her, but these people obviously are incapable of learning in any other fashion other than coming face to face with the consequences of their own poor decisions. Her parents included

3
Foreign_Aid_is_Theft 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trying to remove or ignore the consequences of our decisions is the widest and most tread road to ruin.

4
BadRonald13 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is great news. This will be the end of these surgeries and treatments on kids. Doctors won’t accept the liability.

3
billymcgorn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why don't you sue every news outlet that promoted this bullshit?

2
Klcbva 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope she wins. She was clearly a troubled person who was then subject to mutilation at the hands of a doctor, no less. Adults should make adult decisions - especially when children are in the mix.

1
Jimboslice73 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then she can sue her parents form the decisions under 18.

1
Klcbva 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably couldn’t. Liberals don’t permit parents any ownership over their children. The State decides all now.

1
Honkey_McCracker 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this is in the UK, does that mean that government healthcare paid for her mutilation?

1
Tenspot20 1 point ago +1 / -0

She never could handle the dick. Typical delusional Liberal, you creeps are freakin' weird!

1
Destineed369 1 point ago +1 / -0

They’re clearly too confused to know if they are male or female, but fuck it. Lets give em the right to vote

1
Jimboslice73 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tough shit; live with your decision.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MAGA_4EVER 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think most of us on here agree that kids can't really make that choice.

But I know some liberals who believe that children as young as 3 can.

Insanity. We need to penalize these doctors/hospitals and create laws so that you must be at least 21 before anything is done including hormone therapy.

I know that they say that you should start blocking as young as possible but I don't actually believe children know what they want.

As a side note: I'm reading a book about reincarnation right now written in the 60's. It's supposedly about a scientist who studied over 2000 cases of reincarnation. It's 20 of the cases he thinks best backs up the theory of reincarnation (there are several other books with other cases. I think he stopped at 20 because of length, not lack of evidence.)

I've noticed most of the time, it's f->f or m->m. There are very few cross overs.

Another note is these kids that do remember often times don't have much memory/connection by the time they are in their late teens.

If reincarnation is true, then these people may have been a different gender before (which doesn't often happen, apparently). And they are remembering vestiges of their life from before. It should dissipate by late teens.

Or they're seeking attention. Idk