5615 The difference is clear. . . (media.patriots.win) posted 255 days ago by HTTP_404 255 days ago by HTTP_404 +5615 / -0 202 comments share 202 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (202) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 5 ▼ – ZeroDeltaTango 5 points 255 days ago +5 / -0 No, they shouldn't be allowed to burn the Bible. For three reasons: Consistency: They would never allow burning of the Koran; it would be prosecuted as a hate crime. Law: It probably violates local ordinances against burning within city limits Environment: It pumps CO2 and other pollutants into the atmosphere. We all know that will cause the polar ice caps to melt next week and drown us. Been nice knowing you all! permalink save report block reply
For three reasons:
Consistency: They would never allow burning of the Koran; it would be prosecuted as a hate crime.
Law: It probably violates local ordinances against burning within city limits
Environment: It pumps CO2 and other pollutants into the atmosphere.
We all know that will cause the polar ice caps to melt next week and drown us. Been nice knowing you all!