Has Ellis weighed in yet? Shit just got real. Real, real. This footage was leaked. Ellis was sitting on this. Can't Breathe is a lie just like Hands Up.
Daily Mail is like the NY Post. Not based, but they like to print sensational stuff because it sells, so they will sometimes break away from the cuck narrative. "Someone was going to print it, so it might as well be us."
I've been scrolling through every article on daily mail for many years, and while they have poor grammar, poor editing, and are slightly biased, they do report A LOT of stories that you don't see anywhere else. It's a good way to get coverage on events quickly, but I always check other sources as well. Plus, the comment section is always entertaining.
Yeah it's not the best source but their coverage of major events is like no other. They'll have hundreds of photos and loads of info. In the UK leftists absolutely hate the Mail, calling it racist ,sexist, fake news whatever. Anything they hate is probably actually good
Has Ellis weighed in yet? Shit just got real. Real, real. This footage was leaked. Ellis was sitting on this. Can't Breathe is a lie just like Hands Up.
Daily Mail is like the NY Post. Not based, but they like to print sensational stuff because it sells, so they will sometimes break away from the cuck narrative. "Someone was going to print it, so it might as well be us."
I've been scrolling through every article on daily mail for many years, and while they have poor grammar, poor editing, and are slightly biased, they do report A LOT of stories that you don't see anywhere else. It's a good way to get coverage on events quickly, but I always check other sources as well. Plus, the comment section is always entertaining.
Yeah it's not the best source but their coverage of major events is like no other. They'll have hundreds of photos and loads of info. In the UK leftists absolutely hate the Mail, calling it racist ,sexist, fake news whatever. Anything they hate is probably actually good
WTF. Makes our "press" look either incompetent or biased. I vote for both.
British press on the whole are a bunch of cunts. Massively surprised that one of them has went off script.
Way I see it: Person recorded it at private viewing. Couldn’t trust US media with it. Leaked it to Brits who wouldn’t give af.
American media suddenly finds the laws worth following when a Democrat is trying to suppress information.
The press screener probably assumed they were at least as bad as cnn and let them in. No way OAN would be let in
That newspaper was pro Hitler, that's why!