3857
Comments (156)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
PurestEvil 16 points ago +16 / -0

Yeah they do, because they know once they let in the pedophiles (which certainly fit into their little cult), it's over for them. They will be known as full-on degenerates who praise pedophilia. They know there is a line they may not cross - but they are likely quite tempted to do so.

21
Italians_Invented_2A 21 points ago +21 / -0

You underestimate their power.

They have successfully made it socially acceptable to give hormones or puberty blockers to prepubescent children. If children can choose their gender, it naturally follows that they can choose to have sexual intercourse. The line has already been crossed.

In less than 10 years the media and NPCs will call you a "pedophobe" and a bigot if you're against pedophilia.

12
PurestEvil 12 points ago +12 / -0

I know, it's a slow, subversive process. And if you look back ~50 years, you'll wonder what the hell happened. But it's boiling frogs, and you are right - at some point we have to debate why fucking children is unethical.

7
womp-womp-twice 7 points ago +7 / -0

you only need to look back 10 and 20 years (like, in the year 2000) –

we went straight from "we only want to get married" to dick-chop-off hormone-conversion-therapy for prepubescent (!!!) children, and that being done by adults, with a MD diploma, their teachers encouraging it (or rather, advertizing it or full-on indoctrinating them into it) and the media being fully onboard with such abhorrent evil.

4
Darkheartisland 4 points ago +4 / -0

And it was Democrats that came up with the marriage license to begin with to prevent interracial marriages.

3
ModernKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was seeing this in action which convinced me that the "slippery slope fallacy" was not actually a fallacy.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
billbuckner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because you know love is love, right?