They have successfully made it socially acceptable to give hormones or puberty blockers to prepubescent children. If children can choose their gender, it naturally follows that they can choose to have sexual intercourse. The line has already been crossed.
In less than 10 years the media and NPCs will call you a "pedophobe" and a bigot if you're against pedophilia.
I know, it's a slow, subversive process. And if you look back ~50 years, you'll wonder what the hell happened. But it's boiling frogs, and you are right - at some point we have to debate why fucking children is unethical.
you only need to look back 10 and 20 years (like, in the year 2000) –
we went straight from "we only want to get married" to dick-chop-off hormone-conversion-therapy for prepubescent (!!!) children, and that being done by adults, with a MD diploma, their teachers encouraging it (or rather, advertizing it or full-on indoctrinating them into it) and the media being fully onboard with such abhorrent evil.
You underestimate their power.
They have successfully made it socially acceptable to give hormones or puberty blockers to prepubescent children. If children can choose their gender, it naturally follows that they can choose to have sexual intercourse. The line has already been crossed.
In less than 10 years the media and NPCs will call you a "pedophobe" and a bigot if you're against pedophilia.
I know, it's a slow, subversive process. And if you look back ~50 years, you'll wonder what the hell happened. But it's boiling frogs, and you are right - at some point we have to debate why fucking children is unethical.
you only need to look back 10 and 20 years (like, in the year 2000) –
we went straight from "we only want to get married" to dick-chop-off hormone-conversion-therapy for prepubescent (!!!) children, and that being done by adults, with a MD diploma, their teachers encouraging it (or rather, advertizing it or full-on indoctrinating them into it) and the media being fully onboard with such abhorrent evil.
And it was Democrats that came up with the marriage license to begin with to prevent interracial marriages.
It was seeing this in action which convinced me that the "slippery slope fallacy" was not actually a fallacy.
Because you know love is love, right?