If we can vote by mail, why not vote by email? How about vote by phone? If ANY method of scrutiny is considered a violation of the right to vote, then anything goes right? No restrictions!
Comments (21)
sorted by:
If we can vote by mail, why not vote by email? How about vote by phone? If ANY method of scrutiny is considered a violation of the right to vote, then anything goes right? No restrictions!
They were pushing all angles of electronic/computer voting pre-2016 very fiercely.
"Get rid of all that (Bush) Diebold stuff, millions of dollars for brand new (Soros) stuff!"
"Somehow" they didn't get the "96% chance of Hillary" they thought.
The desperate push for All Mail is specifically to shift off widgets they themselves were advocating but didn't manage to skew sufficiently.
"But there's no voter fraud!"
No one charges the guys "Finding" 10,000 ballots or "Losing" 10,000 ballots. Those are "Honest mistakes".
And the laws tend to hand out "Qualified Immunity" types of things to all the works-for-state types in here too.