1160
Comments (179)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
131
JuicyfearsMAGA 131 points ago +131 / -0

I've seen this posted for about 6 weeks now..the second part is new. I don't know how accurate it is, things like Reddit cash raise red flags about if this is legit.

However, Michelle my Belle Obama has been making the media rounds a lot more the last few days

87
Jk485 87 points ago +87 / -0

My prediction.... they have secretly perfected the art of cloning and will he running their most deviant candidate yet. Tonald Drump. His VP will be Pike Mence.

41
CrystalPlatypus 41 points ago +41 / -0

Diabolical.

19
SharpCookie 19 points ago +19 / -0

Damnit not Drump again!

14
SneakyWino 14 points ago +16 / -2

Ha, and I think it's gonna be Mittens. The left fell in love with him when he dissed Trump and he has been a RINO so they probably feel they could peel off any disaffected Never-Trumpers. I would actually love to see those two debate. Trump would eat him alive!

61
nanowerx 61 points ago +62 / -1

Dude, you cant even open Spotify without being bombarded by multiple ads for playlists and podcasts related to Mike Obama. They are certainly pushing him for a reason during an election year, I just figured he would be the VP selection for the Dems, not that he would be the actual nominee.

26
JuicyfearsMAGA 26 points ago +27 / -1

Even Breitbart speculated that Michelle Obama was going to be the VP nomination in their article today

14
ocdpepe 14 points ago +14 / -0

Alex jones has been saying the tranny will be running since 2016

3
JuicyfearsMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alex Jones says a lot of things. Much of them end up being true, but sometimes he can be off the wall

6
Smubbs 6 points ago +6 / -0

I get audible ads all the time and one of the picture is Mike and his book

43
MemeWarVeteran69 43 points ago +44 / -1

If its going to happen they are running out of time. Especially with them leaning so heavily on mail in ballots. This is from 2016, but it shows all the hurdles changing this late brings on

https://ballotpedia.org/State_laws_and_party_rules_on_replacing_a_presidential_nominee

34
JuicyfearsMAGA 34 points ago +34 / -0

there are so many hurdles legally and ethically but the DNC doesn't care about those things

19
muslimporn 19 points ago +19 / -0

I think the 4chan thing is BS because won't be just pick the real candidate as VP then they can easily find a bunch of ways for the VP to have to take over.

21
Keln 21 points ago +22 / -1

While I do not believe there is a "late candidate" strategy here, I'd also point out that a vote for Biden would likely be counted as a vote for his replacement, if he were to die or withdraw for medical reasons.

This has sort of precedence. Greely in 1872 lost the election, but his electoral votes were cast even though he died. It is presumed had he won, the party could have picked a replacement before the electoral votes were cast (once they are cast, the vice presidential pick becomes President-elect).

Key being, the party can at least attempt to nominate someone else and the electors can choose the new nominee in Biden's stead, regardless of who was actually on the ballot, as the only votes that count, constitutionally, are the electors.

Of course, that would likely send a bunch of cases to SCOTUS. And also, a late change like that would undoubtedly seal the deal for a Democrat loss in any case.

35
Keln 35 points ago +35 / -0

As far as 4chan stuff goes, this whole line is at least kinda plausible.

The only problem is, there is no way to win with a last minute option like described here. It doesn't work.

So I'll stick to my theory that Biden is the candidate because they know it's a loss either way and don't want to waste a "good" candidate.

Their sights are on 2024. By "they" I mean the stiff collared types in the bowels of the party and in Washington.

The DNC itself is headed off a cliff, and by 2024, it might not matter what their plans were.

16
JuicyfearsMAGA 16 points ago +18 / -2

I'm not sure but I'd lean toward it being Biden. There's a chance he will win because normies and suburban women like him for some reason. And the cheat is clearly in with mail in voting. If he wins he's a puppet and they like that.

37
Keln 37 points ago +37 / -0

Yeah I heard all of the same stuff in 2016.

Suppressing speech is not the same as suppressing thought. You might think that the term "silent majority" is an overused cliche at this point, but cold hard facts prove it correct time and again, and 2016 is just the latest example.

I get around a lot, I have to travel for my job, and I come into contact with people all over these great United States. And I hear the same wherever I go, even when I was in NYC last...after a bit of dancing around the issues, to see if who they are talking to is not some SJW woke crazy person, they'll spill their guts about how the left is insane.

Most people won't tell you that until they build some trust in you. So they stay silent. Nobody wants their car keyed, lose their job, get called a racist, or have ANTIFA outside their house just because of their opinion.

It makes people feel like they are in the minority. That is the point...to discourage you. The fact is, we are in the majority. We proved this already. No need to have to prove it again other than to simply vote for Trump again.

There is no amount of ballot chicanery that can stop it. Delay, cause chaos, etc...sure. But stop it? No. They won't get rid of Trump until January 2025.

19
JuicyfearsMAGA 19 points ago +19 / -0

Love the words of encouragement. The fact is the media, establishment, Democrats, socialists, blm, terrorists and the like want us to think we are outnumbered and won't win. That America won't and shouldn't win and does not have a place in the world.

It's great to hear that even in liberal places, people are getting fed up or waking up or both. I do believe Trump will win, but I'm more cautious than you are about it. I know their hatred for us, their hatred for Trump, and I know how far they will try to go to defeat him and us in November. We have to stay vigilant and vote and rally and work and campaign and fight like our country is on the line, because it is, and I'm sure you know that

3
ocdpepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Running mooshell would be a huge invigoration for the demorats. A vote for moshell is a vote for Barack who they still think is POTUS.

29
Bramble 29 points ago +29 / -0

It's not going to be MichaelO. She'll be running 2024 for sure though. They're clearing the field of awful candidates this round giving them "their shot", and blowing up the voting systems.

This clears the way in 2024 for her to run nearly unopposed... Probably let Warren or some literal communist run also to make her appealing to the actual liberals.

17
Southern_Belle 17 points ago +17 / -0

This actually makes more sense.

Why risk harming MO's brand if there's even a chance she would lose? That would ruin her for 2024 and a sure thing, as they see it.

Also, wasn't there talk that she had not be a resident long enough to be a candidate this year?

She will by next election, though.

I think Susan Rice is the best choice. She and Biden have a lot to hide.

Also, it gives her a little practice and her brand would not suffer if she lost.

But if I were a Dem, I would definitely be planning to run MO in 2024.

8
Bramble 8 points ago +8 / -0

I honestly think she also wants to wait until the girls are out of the house.

And their money is safety offshores.

15
MaxineWaters4Prez 15 points ago +15 / -0

She?

0
Tokens_Worth 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why? Because time is ticking away.
Obama scandal will be dealt with in the next term.
It will destroy the obamas and the DNC.

11
JeremiahKassin 11 points ago +12 / -1

Only way Mike makes it to 2024 unscathed is if Trump loses. You and I know, after the election, the gloves come off.

3
kekburglar 3 points ago +3 / -0

👆

3
Tomato 3 points ago +3 / -0

I really hope Tucker runs in 2024. He can destroy anyone in a debate. I do not agree with all of his politics, but he would stand a really good shot imo.