5035
Comments (355)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
warlord1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Again... you’re making a low IQ argument. Being “white” is a loose term. You can be Russian, Jewish, British and still be “white”. That’s just something you see with the eyes.

Being a nationalist is something you fight for, and work for. This is the noble aspect we should be celebrating.

5
JohnBrownsBody 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes and no. Being a nationalist is certainly a state of mind. White is, for the purposes of the press, those who were born in the west, of its majority religion, culture. Put it simply you won't see Adolph Ochs' Grey Lady canceled anytime soon. Or Isaac Wises's temple renamed, even though both identified as proslavery. In contrast we have seen, more than Confederates, even statues of abolitionists destroyed.

And increasingly there are countries, where being identified as "white" by the government has limited your speech. That is inescapable, unless you belong to any explicitly protected class.

1
warlord1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Still... patriotism and god-given rights is not conditioned at all by your skin color. This needs to be under-scored.

4
endthefed11 4 points ago +4 / -0

Intelligence is highly heritable, and IQ is the best measurement of it that we have. It is highly predictive of future socioeconomic success vs antisocial behaviors/ poverty.

0
warlord1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ok. You’re making a lot of specious arguments and dropping buzzwords... I see no arguments in what you just said.

4
endthefed11 4 points ago +4 / -0

You just don't know what the words mean. I'm not making an argument.