Using language as a weapon of thought control is a classic communist tactic. Like calling guns "assault rifles" and calling rape "forced sex", but only when it suits them. "It's not rape, it's just forced sex you see."
They tried this language trick when they first started talking about Sandusky and Penn state. So, so many headlines discussed "allegations by young men" letting people think we were talking about college age boys. These boys were 8, 9 and 10 years old. Little boys, children, definitely not "young men".
I wish 17 would be the age of consent. Seems like 16 is when a girl hits maturity, and then give an extra buffer year for stupid decisions. Pedophilia is terrible and obviously disgusting... but 17 isnt really the same thing.
you're pushing ideas destructive to society. a strong civilization needs high birth rates. high birth rates needs a focus on marriage without birth control, not obsessing over the difference between 17 and 18
if she was 17, in a proper marriage, good irrespective of age. if she was 18 or 35 and using birth control, bad irrespective of age
There's a reason the right can mimic and infiltrate the left. Understanding.
The problems with birth control are that they affect more than just fertility. The drugs affect the mood and behavior. That's the problem I have with it. The side effects aren't advertised correctly to the patient, and the patient is often too young or ignorant or out of touch to recognize what is happening.
The point being, if you weren't a leftist, you wouldn't be talking about it. The whole post reeks of insecurity.
I've been writing on alt right doctrine for 5+ years. Reading neoreaction and James A.Donald for a decade
Accusing me of "infiltrating" the right is ridiculous a sign that you are arguing in bad faith, or just an idiot
Birth control has disastrous consequences to host society, far more than the direct negative health effects
Rather than focusing on the question which will destroy you all and all those you care about, you focus on 17 vs 18. If anyone is the infiltrator, it is you
you are just a retard. make a fake account and add the facebook fake accounts. been writing for years. you have no argument. just here to sow discord with baseless accusations
Listen fellas, Wizard you're probably right that BC can cause a drop in fertility - but used correctly, in a society which values marriage and families, with a culture which at the very minimum doesn't vilify and degrade the act of being parents, well in that type of stable societal structure then BC would be fine. It's not some magic bullet that will solve everything, nor destroy everything. Also Furaffinity you're right too, that he talks like a lefty-fag. Wizard I order you to get your shit together, do a bunch of push ups, and come back when you grow a pair.
Royal Rapist!
Put this monster in prison!
InfoWars.co.uk!
They are giving him as a consolation prize because he's not even American.
They make it sound like Andrew was just overpowered by an underage girl, forced to get a boner and plow her after getting said boner.
He fell down and his dick just slipped in her.
"Forced" by whom?
Using language as a weapon of thought control is a classic communist tactic. Like calling guns "assault rifles" and calling rape "forced sex", but only when it suits them. "It's not rape, it's just forced sex you see."
It's not rape, it's surprise sex!
It wasn't rape-rape! Probably
Forced =rape Underage = rape
Yup its rape
But is it rape rape?
Conspiracy rape?
One more rape? No more rapes! Two more rapes? NO MORE RAPES!
Let's ask Whoopie!
Prince Andrew partook in undocumented intercourse with a pre-woman, bigot.
Fucking inbred Limey piece of shit.
They always do this shit for people or groups they are trying to defend. Men also can't be raped, according to the media.
Most disgusting thing is how they minimize the trauma of boys being abused and raped by their teachers. It's not sexy or funny.
Who’s this Matthew weaver cuck running damage control for Royal pedophiles??
Looks like a diddler to me
Any comment from the Queen about whether child rape is appropriate for the royal family ?
They tried this language trick when they first started talking about Sandusky and Penn state. So, so many headlines discussed "allegations by young men" letting people think we were talking about college age boys. These boys were 8, 9 and 10 years old. Little boys, children, definitely not "young men".
And they were flown around in private jets
Why then, is Matthew Weaver not singled out and questioned as to why he fashioned the headline that way?
His day will come
I wish 17 would be the age of consent. Seems like 16 is when a girl hits maturity, and then give an extra buffer year for stupid decisions. Pedophilia is terrible and obviously disgusting... but 17 isnt really the same thing.
Hmmmm if there was only a word that describes "forced sex" hmmmmm what could it be...???
Europe has been using "forced sex" for a while whenever writing about the muslim migrants and their daily escapades.
"It was just forced touching and slightly unwanted penetration. What's the big deal?"
Don 🍋
Trying to alter the language to downplay and normalize this shit. It's sickening.
Being 17 or 18 doesn’t magically make fornication right or birth control right. Complaining about age is completely missing the point
Go back to reddit
you're pushing ideas destructive to society. a strong civilization needs high birth rates. high birth rates needs a focus on marriage without birth control, not obsessing over the difference between 17 and 18
if she was 17, in a proper marriage, good irrespective of age. if she was 18 or 35 and using birth control, bad irrespective of age
There's a reason the right can mimic and infiltrate the left. Understanding.
The problems with birth control are that they affect more than just fertility. The drugs affect the mood and behavior. That's the problem I have with it. The side effects aren't advertised correctly to the patient, and the patient is often too young or ignorant or out of touch to recognize what is happening.
The point being, if you weren't a leftist, you wouldn't be talking about it. The whole post reeks of insecurity.
https://www.facebook.com/joseph.cassidy.9041 https://www.facebook.com/charles.kindle.750
I've been writing on alt right doctrine for 5+ years. Reading neoreaction and James A.Donald for a decade
Accusing me of "infiltrating" the right is ridiculous a sign that you are arguing in bad faith, or just an idiot
Birth control has disastrous consequences to host society, far more than the direct negative health effects
Rather than focusing on the question which will destroy you all and all those you care about, you focus on 17 vs 18. If anyone is the infiltrator, it is you
I ain't clickin no facebook links.
You're not infiltrating anything. You are here to stay until the red pills take hold, however.
you are just a retard. make a fake account and add the facebook fake accounts. been writing for years. you have no argument. just here to sow discord with baseless accusations
17 is a big difference
Listen fellas, Wizard you're probably right that BC can cause a drop in fertility - but used correctly, in a society which values marriage and families, with a culture which at the very minimum doesn't vilify and degrade the act of being parents, well in that type of stable societal structure then BC would be fine. It's not some magic bullet that will solve everything, nor destroy everything. Also Furaffinity you're right too, that he talks like a lefty-fag. Wizard I order you to get your shit together, do a bunch of push ups, and come back when you grow a pair.