523
Comments (12)
sorted by:
21
Tendie_inspector 21 points ago +21 / -0

They were just finding ballots that Republicans hid.

Actual quote from my far left brother.

8
bigdickhangsright 8 points ago +8 / -0

He is an enabler of voter fraud.

7
BowelSharpton [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

I really am truly sorry to say but, witnessing the INSANE levels of polarization in today's society leads me to believe The Vile Left has WON the culture and just keep beating us down at every opportunity - this is the 'new normal', girls ARE boys/vice-versa, SPEECH itself is now considered HATE because WE say so, cancel this & that, etc. We need to dig up Joe McCarthy and give him the presidential Medal of HONOR.

1
Cminc 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Theyve won nothing. Trump is proof. The only people supporting them are being paid as on-air professionals or so stupid theyll believe in anything that promises them self importance.

Theyre 5 networks, and 4 social media platforms, that just so happen to agree with eachother because if the conservative argument is honestly delivered and heard --instead of characterized-- they always lose. Every time.

One way or the other, liars are always caught and made to pay. Always. It's a fact as old as time and humanity itself.

If they had the numbers they pretend to have, they wouldnt have been desperate enough to side with fires and violence.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
14
such_is_life 14 points ago +14 / -0

I swear to God, the Dems will be the death of this country.

8
45squared 8 points ago +8 / -0

This pisses me off to no end, especially that no-one seems to find this suspicious!!!

8
Dingus 8 points ago +9 / -1

The GOP sees this. They simply have no will to change it.

7
Rawnold_Reagan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Muh voter suppression.

-lefties

4
burkeburke 4 points ago +4 / -0

His math is garbage, but his main point is correct. The correct odds are 524288-1. It's mathematically possible, but it it passes every test for statistical significance.

2
3
burkeburke 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is an update at the bottom of that article:

Update: The initial 6-for-6 report, from the Des Moines Register missed a few Sanders coin-toss wins. (There were a lot of coin tosses!) The ratio of Clinton to Sanders wins was closer to 50-50, which is what we'd expect.

But this is the Washington Post, so who knows.