28
Comments (8)
sorted by:
1
FreeJack2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

He basically says in that article that extremists are basically nationalists, like extreme lefties who act crazy. Whereas a patriot is able to accept truth. He is so conservative, but won't acknowledge it. it's ridiculous.

1
TheRealBuddyB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very controversial, I can see how it would be difficult to paint him as either "good" or "bad."
Was he writing about a world he wanted the future to steer clear from, or was he writing a playbook? Either way, in the end the system he dabbled in was used to build the dystopia he fantasized.

1
FreeJack2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

He became very anti communist. He was an armchair socialist but saw from the inside how far the fascists and commies had taken things down the dystopian hole. i think it's ok to be an armchair socialist, if you in your actions are a patriot. If he was born today he would be conservative. I think he was red pilled by the commies in spain.

0
VoterIDMatters 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, he wasn’t. He was a globalist and his whole schtick was predictive programming.

-1
FreeJack2020 [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

Bullshit, you need to learn how to read.

1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bullshit yourself, jackass. You have read but not understood.

How many of his lectures have you watched? How much of his financial affiliation have you researched?

He was a bona-fide globalist. And you’re a bona-fide dumbshit

1
FreeJack2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've read most of his published work. Homage to catalonia especially shows how much the commies red pilled his ass, and almost had him killed. Commies always turn on anarchists and socialists when it is politically expedient to have them liquidated. He was a closet conservative. IMO.

0
VoterIDMatters 0 points ago +1 / -1

Globalist