4032
Comments (638)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
SpaceForceZulu 3 points ago +3 / -0

He’s suspending a law, not creating one, and reappropriating funds already supplied by congress for the $400. Congress can enact a new program which automatically cancels his EO, and the onus is on them to either forgive the deferral or make spending cuts to recover the money.

How Is that abusive?

And Bummer already drove right past your imaginary line. The country is starving to death while entrenched politicians play fuckfuck games.

1
GulagDweller 1 point ago +1 / -0

I never said I thought the Executive Orders were abusive! I do think it may be making a mistake. Just my opinion.

Referring to the story, it says President Trump signed 4 new Executive Orders. I understand why he is signing them, but it is to get around the normal process if it takes an Executive Order to do so. Whether I agree with those EO's or not, I do know that Libtards will take note and will take such things to the extreme if they get power once again and I can guarantee you none of us are going to like any executive orders coming from the extremist Left.