One of my favorite Sowell interviews with Hoover institution he claims he actually sat through Milton's classes and still came out a Marxist and it wasn't until he worked for (I believe it was) the Bureau of Labor Statistics that he completely changed his mind and became the great conservative economist we know today
I like Milton Friedman by-in-large but they one criticism I have of him is the same one I have of most intellectual libertarians and that is that he divorces theory and the need for intellectual purity from reality.
This is the one reason why I have little respect for many libertarians. By-in-large they are more concerned with the intellectual purity of their arguments than any actual positive change. They are a bit like Antifa without the violence, they want it all or they stay home. This is the strength the left has leveraged. The Left uses what I call "salami tactics" they push their agenda one small sliver at a time over a long period of time. While libertarians are debating applications of the non-aggression principle or arguing with conservatives on the non-nonsensical idea that society can function without taxes, liberals keep pushing the envelope.
When Libertarians don't get their way they take their ball and go home. They have no concept of compromise and the idea of "making a situation a little less shitty". Compromise can suck sometimes but it works over time and with persuasive arguments. That is why the left has been so successful in pushing its policy agenda. America is the frog they boiled.
compromise is the strategy of commies that brought us into the socialist shithole we have now.
This is a domain where compromise destroys the fundamentals of what is being proposed. there is no "little" amount of government that works, or that is ok.
Its a dichotomy, and compromise is complicity.
Imagine if the police compromised on Pedophelia and said that a little bit of pedophelia is ok.
Its outrageous to think to compromise on freedom in the same way, any compromise on freedom in the same way of security is a destruction to the standard.
The fallacy of thinking that advocating living and holding to a standard of freedom being impractical is baffling in the narrowness of foresight.
Compromise has never worked for freedom once. Freedom is ALWAYS the compromise
Yeah and then the fucking libertarians take their ball and go home the second a single thing they don't like happens. In the end instead of making society a little bit better everything gets worse because these children throw a conniption fit, take their ball, then go home and the left knows and exploits this. They are fucking children and I do not take them seriously.
Libertarians, by-in-large are all talk and no action making them worthless.
If they take no action, what is the action of them taking their ball and going home.
What do you reference as "no action"? is the action you're implying a violation of the NAP?
Sure liberty isn't just given, sure liberty needs to be preserved and the market place of force does exist.
Perhaps a libertarian has a higher threshhold to violence than someone who merely doesn't get their way. Perhaps it exists because they value life higher than anyone else. Abortion is a violation of the NAP and not a libertarian stance. I condone any of those claiming to be libertarians who support NAP violations.
What's the one thing that gives evil power, complicity. Man cannot rule over man, to partake is to be complicit.
If an individual claiming to be a Libertarian were to Violate the NAP, they would no longer be considered a Libertarian. and many people do fall out of the doctrine because they do recognize that nullifying the marketplace of force is a multi step action and essential for long term liberty
Milton taught Sowell, but he's white so liberals will just call him a racist
I love Milton, he won the nobel prize in Economics!
FreetoChoose is the best introduction economic series I've seen to date and it was made in the 80's
One of my favorite Sowell interviews with Hoover institution he claims he actually sat through Milton's classes and still came out a Marxist and it wasn't until he worked for (I believe it was) the Bureau of Labor Statistics that he completely changed his mind and became the great conservative economist we know today
I watched that one haha
I remember that!
I like Milton Friedman by-in-large but they one criticism I have of him is the same one I have of most intellectual libertarians and that is that he divorces theory and the need for intellectual purity from reality.
This is the one reason why I have little respect for many libertarians. By-in-large they are more concerned with the intellectual purity of their arguments than any actual positive change. They are a bit like Antifa without the violence, they want it all or they stay home. This is the strength the left has leveraged. The Left uses what I call "salami tactics" they push their agenda one small sliver at a time over a long period of time. While libertarians are debating applications of the non-aggression principle or arguing with conservatives on the non-nonsensical idea that society can function without taxes, liberals keep pushing the envelope.
When Libertarians don't get their way they take their ball and go home. They have no concept of compromise and the idea of "making a situation a little less shitty". Compromise can suck sometimes but it works over time and with persuasive arguments. That is why the left has been so successful in pushing its policy agenda. America is the frog they boiled.
compromise is the strategy of commies that brought us into the socialist shithole we have now.
This is a domain where compromise destroys the fundamentals of what is being proposed. there is no "little" amount of government that works, or that is ok. Its a dichotomy, and compromise is complicity.
Imagine if the police compromised on Pedophelia and said that a little bit of pedophelia is ok. Its outrageous to think to compromise on freedom in the same way, any compromise on freedom in the same way of security is a destruction to the standard.
The fallacy of thinking that advocating living and holding to a standard of freedom being impractical is baffling in the narrowness of foresight.
Compromise has never worked for freedom once. Freedom is ALWAYS the compromise
Yeah and then the fucking libertarians take their ball and go home the second a single thing they don't like happens. In the end instead of making society a little bit better everything gets worse because these children throw a conniption fit, take their ball, then go home and the left knows and exploits this. They are fucking children and I do not take them seriously.
Libertarians, by-in-large are all talk and no action making them worthless.
If they take no action, what is the action of them taking their ball and going home.
What do you reference as "no action"? is the action you're implying a violation of the NAP?
Sure liberty isn't just given, sure liberty needs to be preserved and the market place of force does exist.
Perhaps a libertarian has a higher threshhold to violence than someone who merely doesn't get their way. Perhaps it exists because they value life higher than anyone else. Abortion is a violation of the NAP and not a libertarian stance. I condone any of those claiming to be libertarians who support NAP violations.
What's the one thing that gives evil power, complicity. Man cannot rule over man, to partake is to be complicit.
If an individual claiming to be a Libertarian were to Violate the NAP, they would no longer be considered a Libertarian. and many people do fall out of the doctrine because they do recognize that nullifying the marketplace of force is a multi step action and essential for long term liberty
Fabian methods work. and withdraw is an action.