1858
Comments (31)
sorted by:
77
deleted 77 points ago +77 / -0
51
Phins360_FL 51 points ago +52 / -1

Voter ID too.

Like the way you think

11
BidensHairyLegs 11 points ago +11 / -0

Voter ID should have been an EO from day one of his presidency. Would be tough to rush that through now with only three months to go (from a logistical point of view).

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
40
deleted 40 points ago +40 / -0
20
aaafirefly123 20 points ago +20 / -0

I can’t tell if the Supreme Court giving the President so much power was a good thing or a bad thing.

It feels like we are one step closer to dictatorial rule.

But on the other hand Trump NEEDS that power in order to clean house and purge the government of traitors.

So I’m torn, how do we get rid of entrenched bureaucrats who use our love of freedom and system of government as a shield for their corruption without resorting to dictatorial rule.

My only option is that the head of the Department of Justice should not have to be affirmed by Congress. It should be the only department head the president has complete control over in terms of hiring and firing.

Everything else opens the door to corruption.

8
NYC_4_Trump 8 points ago +8 / -0

Two step approach to draining the swamp:

  1. Every employee and appointee of the Intelligence Community gets fired. Give them two weeks notice, full severance, full pension, revoke their security clearance. Hire non-political newbies to replace them;

  2. Pass Legislation to create term limits on Congress and Senate. For Congress, you can't serve more than 5 terms (10 years). For Senate, you can't serve more than 2 terms (12 years.)

I think Item 1 can be accomplished via creative EO (with reducing funding to $0). Item 2 would actually need support of the elected reps, which is difficult. But, if you make it part of your platform, I'm sure the public would want to see it enacted.

9
I_Love_45-70_Gov 9 points ago +9 / -0

Congress will never pass term limits...ever. the only way that will happen is by pruning the tree of liberty.

4
bigmikespen15 4 points ago +4 / -0

A constitutional convention is another way, but it's been a slog getting all the states needed to sign on.

5
aaafirefly123 5 points ago +5 / -0

If we do that kiss the 2nd amendment goodbye.

I don’t trust the cucks of this nation to not destroy our second amendment.

Or worse they will add a provision that declares America as a borderless nation.

1
lanre 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't replace them. The intelligence agencies themselves are the problem. Replace the people with new ones, and it won't take them long to figure out that they can do a lot of bad stuff with so much power and so little oversight.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
Mitschu 2 points ago +2 / -0

Executive orders are unlimited in scope and cannot be overturned by future presidents, according to the SC.

So on his last day, Trump passes an executive order: "The overreach of the executive branch being overwhelming and enabled entirely by the judiciary, in clear violation of the separation of powers, from today forth presidents, past or future, may not issue any executive orders or decrees without the approval of 45th president Donald J. Trump. Signed, Donald. J. Trump"

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Trumper007 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah thats very limited and just for defense of troops stationed at the border. Doesn't apply for many other things.

24
Yucky 24 points ago +24 / -0

DATA: Deferred Action for Taxpaying Americans.

17
KRosen333 17 points ago +17 / -0

DACA

deferred action for contributing americans

8
Data 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep. There it is. Right there.

22
rossagesausage 22 points ago +22 / -0

Joe Biden literally came out condemning it.

9
redcell5 9 points ago +9 / -0

Shocking. Next you'll tell me he's riddled with dementia.

22
SemperFree 22 points ago +22 / -0

DACA for Americans

Bout time elected officials care about Americans

4
I_Love_45-70_Gov 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only elected official who cared was GEOTUS.

12
journalist 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hear hear

9
PhillyNekim 9 points ago +9 / -0

I was also going to describe it as DACA for americans

5
NinjaGuyDan777 5 points ago +5 / -0

Does this mean I should change my unemployment to not withhold federal tax?

3
GladJones 3 points ago +3 / -0

My understanding is that Trump is allowing "employers to defer payment of the employee portion of payroll tax", which means that you would still have to withhold income tax from your paycheck (FICA, federal, and state taxes), but the employer does not have to remit the taxes until a later date if they elect to do so. It essentially allows business to have more cash in the near-term, but they have to be careful because eventually they will have to pay the tax when it becomes due.

1
MAGA-Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will this also keep people from paying taxes on unemployment funds?

1
GladJones 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am honestly not sure about the tax consequences of the unemployment funds. I haven't looked closely at Trump's executive order. I only heard what he said in a news conference, which was about the deferred payroll tax mentioned above and the $400/month unemployment stimulus extension. I didn't hear anything about the tax consequences of the unemployment benefits. I believe unemployment benefits are generally taxable though.

4
jojojubi 4 points ago +4 / -0

The beauty of this is the payroll tax. People will make way more by working than staying on unemployment.

3
SirSeizureSalad 3 points ago +3 / -0

It really is brilliant, because he is giving people a bonus (read: loan til next year) that are still working. It will help stimulate the economy and give most people enough extra cash to keep going this year.